Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Automated fish cage net inspection using image processing techniques

Fish-cage dysfunction in aquaculture installations can trigger significant negative consequences affecting the operational costs. Low oxygen levels, due to excessive fooling's, leads to decrease growth performance, and feed efficiency. Therefore, frequent periodic inspection of fish-cage nets is required, but this task can become quite expensive with the traditional means of employing professional divers that perform visual inspections at regular time intervals. The modern trend in aquaculture is to take advantage of IT technologies with the use of a small-sized, low-cost autonomous underwater vehicle, permanently residing within a fish cage and performing regular video inspection of the infrastructure for the entire net surface. In this study, we explore specialised image processing schemes to detect net holes of multiple area size and shape. These techniques are designed with the vision to provide robust solutions that take advantage of either global or local image structures to provide the efficient inspection of multiple net holes.

References

    1. 1)
      • 17. Liu, Y., Lin, W.-C., Hays, J.H.: ‘Near-regular texture analysis and manipulation’, ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH 2004), 2004, 23, (3), p. 368.
    2. 2)
      • 12. Ding, L., Goshtasby, A.: ‘On the canny edge detector’, Pattern Recognit., 2001, 34, (3), pp. 721725.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 21. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: ‘Digital image processing’ (Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 2002, 2nd edn.).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Borovic, B., Vasilijevic, A., Kuljaca, O.: ‘Potentials of using underwater robotics for fishing and fish farming’. Proc. of the 10th Int. Workshop Methods for the Development and Evaluation of Maritime Technologies – DEMaT'11, Split, Croatia, 21–23 June 2011.
    6. 6)
      • 8. Wei, C., Junfeng, W., Guannan, C., et al: ‘Denoising and contrast enhancement fusion based on white balance for underwater images’. 2019 Int. Conf. on Image and Video Processing, and Artificial Intelligence, Int. Society for Optics and Photonics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 2019, vol. 11321, p. 113210E.
    7. 7)
      • 13. Mukhopadhyay, P., Chaudhuri, B.B.: ‘A survey of Hough transform’, Pattern Recognit., 2015, 48, (3), pp. 9931010.
    8. 8)
      • 11. Shafait, F., Harvey, E.S., Shortis, M.R., et al: ‘Towards automating underwater measurement of fish length: a comparison of semi-automatic and manual stereo–video measurements’, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2017, 74, (6), pp. 16901701, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx007.
    9. 9)
      • 3. Karimanzira, D., Jacobi, M., Pfuetzenreuter, T., et al: ‘First testing of an AUV mission planning and guidance system for water quality monitoring and fish behavior observation in net cage fish farming’, Inf. Process. Agric., 2014, 1, pp. 131140.
    10. 10)
      • 20. Hagen-Zanker, A.: ‘A computational framework for generalized moving windows and its application to landscape pattern analysis’, Intl. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2016, 44, pp. 205216.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 9. Chen, S., Wu, D., Wei, W., et al: ‘An algorithm for image restoration based on underwater video series’. 2019 Int. Conf. on Modeling, Simulation, Optimization and Numerical Techniques (SMONT 2019), Atlantis Press, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China, 2019.
    13. 13)
      • 4. Cardia, F., Lovatelli, A.: ‘Aquaculture operations in floating HDPE cages A field handbook’. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 593, Rome, Italy, 2015.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 15. Gui, Y., Ma, L.: ‘Periodic pattern of texture analysis and synthesis based on texels distribution’, Vis. Comput., 2010, 26, p. pp. 951964, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-010-0470-x.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 14. Leung, T., Malik, J.: ‘Detecting, localizing and grouping repeated scene elements from an image’. Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, Cambridge, UK, 1996, pp. 546555.
    18. 18)
      • 6. Osen, O.L., Sandvik, R., Berge Trygstad, J., et al: ‘A novel low cost ROV for aquaculture application’. OCEANS 2017, Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, 2017, pp. 17.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 2. Bao, J., Li, D., Qiao, X., et al: ‘Integrated navigation for autonomous underwater vehicles in aquaculture: a review’, Information Processing in Agriculture, 2020, 7, (1), pp. 139151.
    21. 21)
      • 10. Siddiqui, S.A., Salman, A., Malik, M.I., et al: ‘Automatic fish species classification in underwater videos: exploiting pre-trained deep neural network models to compensate for limited labelled data’, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2018, 75, pp. 374389.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1667
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1667
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address