Successive minutia-free mosaicking for small-sized fingerprint recognition

Successive minutia-free mosaicking for small-sized fingerprint recognition

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Image Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Small-sized fingerprint sensors, due to the convenience of integration, are widely used in many applications, especially on smart phones. However, the friction ridge information decreases with the reduction of the collected fingerprint area, resulting in degraded recognition performance. Mosaicking fingerprint impressions has been proved to be effective in boosting the recognition accuracy. Nonetheless, the minutiae-based mosaicking methods do not work well when there is no sufficient number of minutiae in the overlapping area while existing minutia-free mosaicking methods are not robust to distortion and result in low mosaicking accuracy. In this study, a novel minutia-free mosaicking algorithm used the coarse-to-fine approach is proposed to obtain a larger fingerprint impression from a couple of small-sized fingerprint impressions. It consists of three stages: an orientation field-based coarse alignment, a ridge matching-based fine alignment, and a nonlinear deformation correction with block-correspondence Thin Plate Spline model. Experimental results on the XDfinger database demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the other six mosaicking methods in terms of reject-to-fuse rate, registration accuracy, and verification performance. Specifically, in the verification scenario, the equal error rate is reduced from 1.98% of a single impression to 0.41% of two impressions mosaicked by the authors' method.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Jain, A.K., Arora, S.S., Cao, K., et al: ‘Fingerprint recognition of young children’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Foren. Sec., 2017, 12, (7), pp. 15011514.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Lee, W., Cho, S., Choi, H., et al: ‘Partial fingerprint matching using minutiae and ridge shape features for small fingerprint scanners’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2017, 87, pp. 183198.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Jain, A.K., Ross, A.: ‘Fingerprint mosaicking’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Orlando, Florida, USA, May 2002, Vol. 4, pp. IV-4064IV-4067.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Cao, K., Jain, A.K.: ‘Learning fingerprint reconstruction: from minutiae to image’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Foren. Sec., 2015, 10, (1), pp. 104117.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Su, Y.J., Feng, J.J., Zhou, J.: ‘Fingerprint indexing with pose constraint’, Pattern Recognit., 2016, 54, pp. 113.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Jain, A.K., Nandakumar, K., Ross, A.: ‘50 years of biometric research: accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2016, 79, pp. 80105.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Liu, E., Zhao, Q.: ‘Encrypted domain matching of fingerprint minutia cylinder-code (MCC) with l1 minimization’, Neurocomputing, 2017, 259, pp. 313.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Tarar, S., Kumar, E.: ‘Fingerprint mosaicking algorithm to improve the performance of fingerprint matching system’, Comput. Sci. Inf. Tech., 2014, 2, (3), pp. 142151.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Uz, T., Bebis, G., Erol, A., et al: ‘Minutiae-based template synthesis and matching using hierarchical Delaunay triangulations’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, Washington DC, USA, September 2007, pp. 18.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Choi, K., Choi, H.S., Kim, J.: ‘Fingerprint mosaicking by rolling and sliding’. Proc. Int. Conf. Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Berlin, Germany, July 2005, pp. 260269.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Zhang, Y.L., Yang, J., Wu, H.T.: ‘A hybrid swipe fingerprint mosaicking scheme’. Proc. Int. Conf. Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Berlin, Germany, July 2005, pp. 131140.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Toh, K.A., Yau, W.Y., Jiang, X., et al: ‘Minutiae data synthesis for fingerprint identification applications’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing, Thessaloniki, Greece, October 2001, Vol. 3, pp. 262265.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Moon, Y.S., Yeung, H.W., Chan, K.C., et al: ‘Template synthesis and image mosaicking for fingerprint registration: an experimental study’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 2004, Vol. 5, pp. V409.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lee, D., Choi, K., Lee, S., et al: ‘Fingerprint fusion based on minutiae and ridge for enrollment’. Proc. Int. Conf. Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Guildford, UK, June 2003, pp. 478485.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Shah, S., Ross, A., Shah, J., et al: ‘Fingerprint mosaicking using thin plate splines’. Proc. Int. Conf. biometric consortium, September, 2005.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Choi, K., Choi, H., Lee, S., et al: ‘Fingerprint image mosaicking by recursive ridge mapping’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 2007, 37, (5), pp. 11911203.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Bhati, S.H., Pati, U.C.: ‘Phase correlation based algorithm using fast Fourier transform for fingerprint mosaicking’. Proc. Int. Conf. Advanced Computing, Networking and Informatics, New Delhi, India, May 2016, pp. 507514.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Liu, F., Zhang, D., Song, C., et al: ‘Touchless multiview fingerprint acquisition and mosaicking’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2013, 62, (9), pp. 24922502.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Yager, N., Amin, A.: ‘Coarse fingerprint registration using orientation fields’, EURASIP J. Adv. Sig. Pr., 2005, 2005, (13), p. 935080.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Yager, N., Amin, A.: ‘Fingerprint alignment using a two-stage optimization’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2006, 27, (5), pp. 317324.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Krish, R.P., Fierrez, J., Ramos, D., et al: ‘Pre-registration of latent fingerprints based on orientation field’, IET Biometrics, 2015, 4, (2), pp. 4252.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Si, X.B., Feng, J.J., Yuan, B., et al: ‘Dense registration of fingerprints’, Pattern Recogn., 2017, 63, pp. 87101.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Menesatti, P., Angelini, C., Pallottino, F., et al: ‘Rgb color calibration for quantitative image analysis: the ‘3d thin-plate spline’ warping approach’, Sensors, 2012, 12, (6), pp. 70637079.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Ross, A., Nadgir, R.: ‘A thin-plate spline calibration model for fingerprint sensor interoperability’, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2008, 20, (8), pp. 10971110.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address