Automatic detection of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia based on extending the multifractal features

Automatic detection of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia based on extending the multifractal features

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Image Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The main purpose of this study is to introduce a new species of features to improve the diagnosis efficiency of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia from microscopic images. First, the authors segmented nuclei by the k-means and watershed algorithms. They extracted three sets of geometrical, statistical, and chaotic features from nuclei images. Six chaotic features were extracted by calculating the fractal dimension from five sub-images driven from the nuclei images, with their grey levels being modified. The authors classified the images into binary and multiclass types via the support vector machine algorithm. They conducted principal component analysis for dimensional reduction of feature space and then evaluated the proposed algorithm for the overfitting problem. The obtained overall results represent 99% accuracy, 99% specificity, and 97% sensitivity values in the classification of six-cell groups. The difference between the train and test errors was <3%, which proves that the classification performance had improved by using the multifractal features.


    1. 1)
      • 1. National Cancer Institute: ‘Cancer stat facts: leukemia – acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) 2018’. Available at
    2. 2)
      • 2. Bennett, J.M., Catovsky, D., Daniel, M.T., et al: ‘Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias French-American-British (FAB) Co-operative Group’, British J. Hematol., 1976, 33, (4), pp. 451458.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Onciu, M.: ‘Acute lymphoblastic leukemia’, Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am., 2009, 23, (4), pp. 655674.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Mishra, S., Majhi, B., Sa, P.K., et al: ‘Gray level co-occurrence matrix and random forest-based acute lymphoblastic leukemia detection’, Biomed. Signal Proc. Control, 2017, 33, pp. 272280.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Putzu, L., Di Ruberto, C. (Eds.): ‘Investigation of different classification models to determine the presence of leukemia in peripheral blood image’. Int. Conf. Image Analysis and Processing, Naples, Italy, 2013.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Mohapatra, S., Patra, D., Satpathy, S.: ‘An ensemble classifier system for early diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in blood microscopic images’, Neural Comput. Appl., 2014, 24, (7-8), pp. 18871904.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Putzu, L., Caocci, G., Di Ruberto, C.: ‘Leucocyte classification for leukemia detection using image processing techniques’, Artif. Intell. Med., 2014, 62, (3), pp. 179191.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Mishra, S., Sharma, L., Majhi, B., et al (Eds.): ‘Microscopic image classification using DCT for the detection of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Image Processing, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India, 2017.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Aimi, A.N., Mashor, M.Y., Rosline, H.: ‘Classification of acute leukemia cells using multilayer perceptron and simplified fuzzy ARTMAP neural networks’, 2013.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Escalante, H.J., Montes-y-Gómez, M., González, J.A., et al: ‘Acute leukemia classification by ensemble particle swarm model selection’, Artif. Intell. Med., 2012, 55, (3), pp. 163175.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Neoh, S.C., Srisukkham, W., Zhang, L., et al: ‘An intelligent decision support system for leukemia diagnosis using microscopic blood images’, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, pp. 477.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Rawat, J., Singh, A., Bhadauria, H., et al: ‘Classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia using hybrid hierarchical classifiers’, Multimedia Tools Appl., 2017, 76, pp. 1905719085.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Moradi Amin, M., Memari, A., Samadzadehaghdam, N., et al: ‘Computer-aided detection and classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell subtypes based on microscopic image analysis’, Microsc. Res. Tech., 2016, 79, (10), pp. 908916.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Amin, M.M., Kermani, S., Talebi, A., et al: ‘Recognition of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells in microscopic images using k-means clustering and support vector machine classifier’, J. Med. Signals. Sens., 2015, 5, (1), p. 49.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Aghdam, N.S., Amin, M.M., Tavakol, M.E., et al: ‘Designing and comparing different color map algorithms for pseudo-coloring breast thermograms’, J. Med. Imaging. Health. Inform., 2013, 3, (4), pp. 487493.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Mandelbrot, B.B., Pignoni, R.: ‘The fractal geometry of nature’ (WH Freeman, New York, 1983).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Sarkar, N., Chaudhuri, B.: ‘An efficient differential box-counting approach to compute FD of image’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1994, 24, (1), pp. 115120.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Al-Kadi, O.S.: ‘Tumour grading and discrimination based on class assignment and quantitative texture analysis techniques’, University of Sussex, 2010.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Al-Kadi, O.S., Watson, D.: ‘Texture analysis of aggressive and nonaggressive lung tumor CE CT images’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2008, 55, (7), pp. 18221830.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Al-Kadi, O.S.: ‘A multiresolution clinical decision support system based on fractal model design for classification of histological brain tumours’, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 2015, 41, pp. 6779.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Chaudhuri, B.B., Sarkar, N.: ‘Texture segmentation using FD’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1995, 17, (1), pp. 7277.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Sankar, D., Thomas, T.: ‘Fractal features based on differential box-counting method for the categorization of digital mammograms’, J. Comp. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manage. Appl., 2010, 2, pp. 1119.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Hinterstoisser, S., Lepetit, V., Ilic, S., et al (Eds.): ‘Dominant orientation templates for real-time detection of texture-less objects’. 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, USA, 2010.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Brown, L.G., Shvaytser, H.: ‘Surface orientation from projective foreshortening of isotropic texture autocorrelation’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1990, 12, (6), pp. 584588.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Andrecut, M.: ‘Parallel GPU implementation of iterative PCA algorithms’, J. Comput. Biol., 2009, 16, (11), pp. 15931599.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Suykens, J.A., Vandewalle, J.: ‘Least squares support vector machine classifiers’, Neural Process. Lett., 1999, 9, (3), pp. 293300.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Hsu, C.-W., Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J.: ‘A practical guide to support vector classification’, 2003.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: ‘The elements of statistical learning’, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York, 2001).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address