Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Information fusion for unsupervised image segmentation using stochastic watershed and Hessian matrix

This study deals with information fusion for image segmentation. The evidence theory (or the Dempster–Shafer theory) allows the modellisation of uncertainty and imprecision in the information as well as the combination of different sources. Here, this approach is used in an unsupervised framework to combine the stochastic watershed segmentation which provides several segmentation results, with a Hessian operator in order to obtain a unique and efficient segmentation. The method is tested on natural images from the Berkeley dataset and evaluated using several evaluation metrics. The fusion results surpass those obtained with stochastic watershed alone.

References

    1. 1)
      • 33. Van Rijsbergen, J.: ‘A non-classical logic for information retrieval’, Comput. J., 1986, 29, pp. 481485.
    2. 2)
      • 17. Meyer, F.: ‘Topographic distance and watershed lines’, Signal Process., 1994, 38, pp. 113125.
    3. 3)
      • 5. Beucher, S., Lantuéjoul, C.: ‘Use of watersheds in contour detection’, 1979.
    4. 4)
      • 20. Franchi, G., Angulo, J.: ‘Bagging stochastic watershed on natural color image segmentation’, in Benediktsson, J., Chanussot, J., Najman, L., Talbot, H. (Eds.): ‘Mathematical morphology and its applications to signal and image processing’ (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2015), pp. 422433.
    5. 5)
      • 10. Kennes, R.: ‘Computational aspects of the mobius transformation of graphs’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1992, 22, pp. 201223.
    6. 6)
      • 9. Guan, J.W., Bell, D.A.: ‘Evidence theory and its applications’ (Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, 1991).
    7. 7)
      • 3. Bloch, I.: ‘Fusion d'informations numériques: panorama méthodologique’, J. Nationales de la Recherche en Robotique, 2005, 2005, pp. 7988.
    8. 8)
      • 1. Dempster, P.: ‘Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping’, Ann. Math. Stat., 1967, 38, (2), pp. 325339.
    9. 9)
      • 31. Bowyer, K., Kranenburg, C., Dougherty, S.: ‘Edge detector evaluation using empirical ROC curves’, IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1999.
    10. 10)
      • 19. Angulo, J., Velasco-Forero, S., Chanussot, J.: ‘Multiscale stochastic watershed for unsupervised hyperspectral image segmentation’. IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2009 (IGARSS 2009), 2009, pp. III-93III-96.
    11. 11)
      • 30. Denoeux, T.: ‘A neural network classifier based on dempster–Shafer theory’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A, Syst. Humans, 2000, 30, pp. 131150.
    12. 12)
      • 13. Serra, J.: ‘Image analysis and mathematical morphology’ (Academic Press, 1982), vol. 1.
    13. 13)
      • 32. Martin, D.R., Fowlkes, C.C., Malik, J.: ‘Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2004, 26, pp. 530549.
    14. 14)
      • 27. Tankyevych, O., Talbot, H., Dokladal, P.: ‘Curvilinear morpho-Hessian filter’. 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008 (ISBI 2008), 2008, pp. 10111014.
    15. 15)
      • 28. Lefkimmiatis, S., Bourquard, A., Unser, M.: ‘Hessian-based norm regularization for image restoration with biomedical applications’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2012, 21, pp. 983995.
    16. 16)
      • 29. Zouhal, L.M., Denoeux, T.: ‘An evidence-theoretic k-NN rule with parameter optimization’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., 1998, 28, pp. 263271.
    17. 17)
      • 16. Vincent, L., Soille, P.: ‘Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1991, 13, (6), pp. 583598.
    18. 18)
      • 15. Beucher, S.: ‘Watershed, hierarchical segmentation and waterfall algorithm’, in Serra, J., Soille, P. (Ed.): ‘Mathematical morphology and its applications to image processing’ (Springer, Dordrecht, 1994), pp. 6976.
    19. 19)
      • 2. Shafer, G.: ‘A mathematical theory of evidence’ (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976), vol. 1.
    20. 20)
      • 6. Angulo, J., Jeulin, D.: ‘Stochastic watershed segmentation’. Proc. Institute of Supply and Materials Management (ISMM), Rio de Janeiro, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 265276.
    21. 21)
      • 8. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., et al: ‘A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics’. Proc. Eighth IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2001 (ICCV 2001), 2001, pp. 416423.
    22. 22)
      • 23. Angulo, J.: ‘Statistical Gaussian model of image regions in stochastic watershed segmentation’, in Nielsen, F., Barbaresco, F. (Eds): ‘Geometric science of information’ (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp. 396405.
    23. 23)
      • 11. Appriou: ‘Probabilités et incertitude en fusion de données multi-senseurs’, Tiré à part – Office national d’études et de recherches aerospatiales, 1991.
    24. 24)
      • 25. Frangi, A.F., Niessen, W.J., Vincken, K.L., et al: ‘Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering’, in Wells, W.M., Colchester, A., Delp, S. (Eds): ‘Medical image computing and computer-assisted interventation—MICCAI'98’ (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 130137.
    25. 25)
      • 26. Sato, Y., Nakajima, S., Shiraga, N., et al: ‘Three-dimensional multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images’, Med. Image Anal., 1998, 2, pp. 143168.
    26. 26)
      • 21. Bernander, K. B., Gustavsson, K., Selig, B., et al: ‘Improving the stochastic watershed’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2013, 34, pp. 9931000.
    27. 27)
      • 34. Beauchemin, M., Thomson, K.P., Edwards, G.: ‘On the Hausdorff distance used for the evaluation of segmentation results’, Can. J. Remote Sens., 1998, 24, pp. 38.
    28. 28)
      • 18. Couprie, M., Bertrand, G.: ‘Topological gray-scale watershed transformation’. Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation'97, 1997, pp. 136146.
    29. 29)
      • 12. Denoeux, T.: ‘A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on Dempster–Shafer theory’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1995, 25, pp. 804813.
    30. 30)
      • 4. Digabel, H., Lantuéjoul, C.: ‘Iterative algorithms’. Proc. 2nd European Symp. on Quantitative Analysis of Microstructures in Material Science, Biology and Medicine, 1978, p. 8.
    31. 31)
      • 24. Steidl, G.: ‘A note on the dual treatment of higher-order regularization functionals’, Computing, 2006, 76, pp. 135148.
    32. 32)
      • 22. Meyer, F., Stawiaski, J.: ‘A stochastic evaluation of the contour strength’, in Goesele, M., Roth, S., Kuijper, A., Schiele, B., Schindler, K. (Eds): ‘Pattern Recognition’ (Springer, Berlin, 2010), pp. 513522.
    33. 33)
      • 14. Meyer, F., Beucher, S.: ‘Morphological segmentation’, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., 1990, 1, pp. 2146.
    34. 34)
      • 7. Danielsson, P.-E., Lin, Q., Ye, Q.-Z.: ‘Efficient detection of second-degree variations in 2D and 3D images’, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., 2001, 12, pp. 255305.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.0798
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.0798
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address