access icon free Myocardium segmentation in Strain-Encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance images using graph-cuts

Evaluation of cardiac functions using Strain Encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a powerful tool for imaging the deformation of left and right ventricles. However, automated analysis of SENC images is hindered due to the low signal-to-noise ratio SENC images. In this work, the authors propose a method to segment the left and right ventricles myocardium simultaneously in SENC-MR short-axis images. In addition, myocardium seed points are automatically selected using skeletonisation algorithm and used as hard constraints for the graph-cut optimization algorithm. The method is based on a modified formulation of the graph-cuts energy term. In the new formulation, a signal probabilistic model is used, rather than the image histogram, to capture the characteristics of the blood and tissue signals and include it in the cost function of the graph-cuts algorithm. The method is applied to SENC datasets for 11 human subjects (five normal and six patients with known myocardial wall motion abnormality). The segmentation results of the proposed method are compared with those resulting from both manual segmentation and the conventional histogram-based graph-cuts segmentation algorithm. The results show that the proposed method outperforms the histogram-based graph-cuts algorithm especially to segment the thin structure of the right ventricle.

Inspec keywords: cardiology; optimisation; medical image processing; probability; muscle; image coding; image segmentation; biomedical MRI

Other keywords: right ventricles; SENC; myocardial wall motion abnormality; myocardium borders; skeletonisation algorithm; left ventricles; MRI; strain-encoded magnetic resonance images; heart function; signal-to-noise ratio; graph-cut optimisation algorithm; myocardium segmentation; signal probabilistic model

Subjects: Biomechanics, biorheology, biological fluid dynamics; Medical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy; Biology and medical computing; Biomedical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy; Computer vision and image processing techniques; Optimisation techniques; Image and video coding; Optimisation techniques; Patient diagnostic methods and instrumentation

References

    1. 1)
      • 5. Fahmy, A.S.: ‘Background noise removal in cardiac magnetic resonance images using Bayes classifier’. Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology (EMBC), 2008.
    2. 2)
      • 14. Shi, W., Zhuang, X., Wolz, R., et al: ‘A multi-image graph cut approach for cardiac image segmentation and uncertainty estimation’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 178187.
    3. 3)
      • 9. Fahmy, A.S., Stuber, M., Osman, N.F.: ‘Correction of through plane deformation artifacts in stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) cardiac imaging’, Magn. Reson. Med., 2006, 55, (2), pp. 404412 (doi: 10.1002/mrm.20781).
    4. 4)
      • 6. Ibrahim, E.S., Weiss, R.G., Stuber, M., et al: ‘Identification of different heart tissues from MRI C-SENC images using an unsupervised multi-stage fuzzy clustering technique’, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2008, 28, pp. 519526 (doi: 10.1002/jmri.21452).
    5. 5)
      • 4. Cerqueira, M.D., Weissman, N.J., Dilsizian, V., et al: ‘Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the American Heart Association’, Circulation, 2002, 105, pp. 53942 (doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975).
    6. 6)
      • 7. Al-Agamy, A.O., Fahmy, A.S.: ‘Segmentation of strain-encoded magnetic resonance images using graph-cuts2011 IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), IEEE, 2011, pp. 219224.
    7. 7)
      • 2. Hamdan, A., Thouet, T., Sebastian, K., et al: ‘Regional right ventricular function and timing of contraction in healthy volunteers evaluated by strain-encoded MRI’, J. Magn. Reson. Function, 2008, 28, (6), pp. 137985 (doi: 10.1002/jmri.21526).
    8. 8)
      • 3. Lardo, A.C., Abraham, T.P., Kass, D.A.: ‘Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony: current and emerging concepts’, J. American College of Cardiology (JACC), 2005, 46, (12), pp. 22238 (doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.015).
    9. 9)
      • 1. Hui, W., Amini, A.A.: ‘Cardiac motion and deformation recovery from MRI: a review’, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2012, 31, (2), pp. 487503 (doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2171706).
    10. 10)
      • 12. Yang, Z., Guo, F., Dong, P.: ‘Skeleton extraction of a specified object in the gray image based on geometric features’, Information computing and applications, communications in computer and information science, (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 161168.
    11. 11)
      • 13. Toennies, K., ‘Validation’, Guide to medical image analysis, advances in computer vision and pattern recognition, (Springer, London, 2012), pp. 413442.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Sijbers, J., den Dekker, A.J., Scheunders, P., et al: ‘Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters’, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 1998, 17, (3), pp. 357361 (doi: 10.1109/42.712125).
    13. 13)
      • 8. Boykov, Y., Funka-Lea, G.: ‘Graph cuts and efficient N-D image segmentation’, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2006, 70, (2), pp. 109131 (doi: 10.1007/s11263-006-7934-5).
    14. 14)
      • 10. Perez, G., Conci, A., Moreno, A.B., et al: ‘Presenting novel de-noising techniques for brain MRI’, 2012, pp. 244247.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0513
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0513
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading