Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Dynamic available transfer capability computation using a hybrid approach

Dynamic available transfer capability computation using a hybrid approach

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In a restructured electricity market, accurate evaluation of available transfer capability (ATC) with dynamic constraints is a challenging task. An approach to determine dynamic ATC, utilising the benefits of a direct method as well as time-domain simulation method, has been developed. Structure-preserving energy function model, which retains the topology of the network, along with transient stability limit, has been used to compute dynamic ATC for bilateral as well as multilateral transactions in an electricity market. Constant impedance as well as composite models for real power loads have been considered. A new contingency severity index, which takes into account the impact of transactions on the severity of the contingencies, has been proposed to reduce the list of credible contingencies to be considered in determining the ATC. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, it has been tested on 10-machine, 39-bus New England system and a practical 60-machine, 246-bus Indian system.

References

    1. 1)
      • M.A. Pai . (1989) Energy function analysis for power system stability.
    2. 2)
      • Yamada, Y., Nagata, M., Tanaka, K.: `An energy function based contingency screening method for ATC assessment with transient stability constraints', Proc. Transmission and Distribution Conf. Exhibition 2002, Yokohama, Japan, p. 886–890.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • P. Kundur . (1994) Power system stability and control.
    5. 5)
      • J. Machowski , J.W. Bialek , J.R. Bumby . (1997) Power system dynamics and stability.
    6. 6)
      • K.R. Padiyar . (2002) Power system dynamics stability and control.
    7. 7)
      • http://www.nrldc.org, accessed December 2007.
    8. 8)
      • `Available transfer capability definitions and determination', NERC Report, June 1996, North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC).
    9. 9)
      • S.K. Joo , C.C. Liu . Optimization techniques for available transfer capability and market calculations. IMA J. Manage. Math. , 321 - 337
    10. 10)
      • De Marco, C.L.: `Identifying swing mode bifurcations and associated limits on available transfer capability', Proc. American Control Conf., June 1998, p. 2980–2985.
    11. 11)
      • M.M. Othman , A. Mohamed , A. Hussain . Fast evaluation of available transfer capability using cubic-spline interpolation technique. Electr. Power Syst. Res. , 3 , 335 - 342
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Y. Cheng , T.S. Chung , C.Y. Chung , C.W. Yu . Dynamic voltage stability constrained ATC calculation by a QSS approach. Electr. Power Energy Syst. , 26 , 408 - 412
    14. 14)
      • Tada, Y., Kurita, A., Zhou, Y., Koyanagi, K., Chiang, H.D., Zheng, Y.: `BCU-guided time domain method for energy margin calculation to improve BCU-DSA system', Proc. Transmission and Distribution Conf. Exhibition, 2002, Yokohama, Japan, p. 366–371.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • J. Arrillaga , C.P. Arnold . (1983) Computer modelling of electrical power system.
    17. 17)
      • M. Eidiani , M.H.M. Shanechi . FAD-ATC: A new method for computing dynamic ATC. Electr. Power Energy Syst. , 2 , 109 - 118
    18. 18)
      • Hiskens, I.A., Pai, M.A., Sauer, P.W.: `An iterative approach to calculating dynamic ATC', Proc. Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control IV – Restructuring, August 1998, Santorini, Greece, p. 585–590.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • Jain, T., Singh, S.N., Srivastava, S.C.: `A neural network based method for fast ATC estimation in electricity markets', Proc. IEEE PES General Meeting, June 2007, Tampa, FL.
    22. 22)
      • K.R. Padiyar , K.K. Ghosh . Direct stability evaluation of power systems with detailed generator models using structure preserving energy functions. Electr. Power Energy Syst. , 1 , 47 - 56
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd_20070497
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd_20070497
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address