Steady state formulation of FACTS devices based on ac/ac converters

Author(s): J.M. Ramirez ; J.M. González ; M.L. Crow
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd:20060329

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF

Buy Knowledge Pack

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership

Recommend Title Publication to library

IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Author(s): J.M. Ramirez ¹ ; J.M. González ¹ ; M.L. Crow ²
- Affiliations: 1: Guadalajara. Av. Cientifica 1145. Col. El Bajio, Zapopan, Jal., CINVESTAV, Mexico
  2: Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla
Source: Volume 1, Issue 4, July 2007, p. 619 – 631
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd:20060329 , Print ISSN 1751-8687, Online ISSN 1751-8695

Here the analysis on the inclusion of a pulse width modulated (PWM) ac link unified power flow controller into a power flow program is discussed. Similarly, a PWM series compensator is connected to the power system to regulate the active power flow on the corresponding transmission line. Details of the Newton–Raphson's power flow algorithm are exhibited. Results of simulation are presented on a 39-buses power system.

References

1. 1)
  - P. Matavelli , G. Verghese , A.M. Stankovic . Phasor dynamics of thyristor – controlled series capacitor systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 1259 - 1267
2. 2)
  - G. Venkataramanan . Three-phase vector switching converters for power flow control. IEE Proc., Electr. Power Appl. , 3 , 321 - 333
3. 3)
  - C.R. Fuerte-Esquivel , E. Acha . Unified power flow controller: a critical comparison of Newton–Raphson UPFC algorithms in power flow studies. IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 5 , 437 - 444
4. 4)
  - K.K. Sen , E.J. Stacey . UPFC – Unified power flow controller: theory, modeling, and applications. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 4 , 1453 - 1460
5. 5)
  - A.T. Johns , A. Ter-Gazarian , D.F. Warne . (1999) Flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS).
6. 6)
  - Gyugyi, L.: `Application characteristics of converter-based FACTS controllers', Proc. Int. Conf. Power System Technology (PowerCon 2000), December 2000, 1, Piscataway, NJ, USA, p. 391–396.
7. 7)
  - Y. Chen , B.T. Ooi . STATCOM based on multimodules of multilevel converters under multiple regulation feedback control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. , 5 , 959 - 965
8. 8)
  - Mancilla-David, F., Venkataramanan, G.: `A pulse width modulated AC link unified power flow controller', Proc. 2005 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, , San Francisco, CA, USA.
9. 9)
  - C.R. Fuerte-esquivel , E. Acha . Unified power flow controller: a critical comparison of newton–Raphson UPFC algorithms in power flow studies. IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 5 , 437 - 444
10. 10)
  - N.G. Hingorani , L. Gyugyi . (1999) Understanding FACTS.
11. 11)
  - B.T. Ooi , S.-Z. Dai . Series-type solid-state static VAR compensator. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. , 2 , 164 - 169
12. 12)
  - (1995) FACTS overview, IEEE Press.
13. 13)
  - C.A. Canizares , Z.T. Four . Analysis for SVC and TCSC controllers in voltage collapse. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 158 - 165
14. 14)
  - K.R. Padiyar . (2002) Power system dynamics stability and control.
15. 15)
  - B.K. Perkins , M.R. Iravani . Dynamic modeling of high power static switching circuits in the dq-frame. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 678 - 684
16. 16)
  - L. Gyugyi , C.D. Schauder , K.K. Sen . Static synchronous series compensator: a solid-state approach to the series compensation of transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 1 , 406 - 417
17. 17)
  - (1996) FACTS applications.
18. 18)
  - P. Wheeler , J. Clare , L. Empringham , M. Apap , M. Bland . Matrix converters. Power Eng. J. , 6 , 273 - 282
19. 19)
  - Nabavi-niaki, A., Iravani, M.R.: `Steady-state and dynamic models of unified power flow controller (UPFC) for power system studies', IEEE/PES Winter Meeting '96 WM 257-6 PWRS, 21–25 January 1996, Baltimore, MD.
20. 20)
  - D. Gotham , G.T. Heydt . Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 60 - 65
21. 21)
  - F.Z. Peng , L. Chen , F. Zhang . Simple topologies of PWM AC-AC converters. IEEE Power Electron. Lett. , 1 , 10 - 13
22. 22)
  - G. Venkataramanan , B.K. Johnson . Pulse width modulated series compensator. IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 1 , 71 - 75
23. 23)
  - O. Simon , J. Mahlein , M.N. Muenzer , M. Bruckmann . Modern solutions for industrial matrix-converter applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. , 2 , 401 - 406
24. 24)
  - I. Dobson . Stability of ideal thyristor and diode switching circuits. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. , 12 , 517 - 529
25. 25)
  - B.T. Ooi , M. Kazerani . Voltage-source matrix converter as a controller in flexible AC transmission systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 1 , 247 - 253

Steady state formulation of FACTS devices based on ac/ac converters

Steady state formulation of FACTS devices based on ac/ac converters

Buy article PDF

Buy Knowledge Pack

Thank you

References

Related content