Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Decentralised wide-area back-up protection scheme based on the concept of centre of reactive power

Here, a new decentralised approach-based wide-area back-up protection (WABP) scheme is proposed for faulted line identification (FLI). The scheme is divided into two sub-routines, i.e. possible faulted region (PFR) identification and FLI. Initially, the power system under study is divided into different coherent regions. The concept of centre of reactive power (CORP) is used to accomplish the task of PFR. Once the faulted region is identified, FLI is done by continuously monitoring the direction of reactive power flow (DORPF) of each line within the PFR. The proposed scheme is extensively tested on IEEE-39 bus test system for different types of faults. The performance of the scheme under stressed system conditions is also investigated. The obtained results show that the suggested algorithm is able to maintain the balance between dependability and security aspects of the protection logic.

References

    1. 1)
      • 20. Agrawal, V.K., Agarwal, P.K., Rathour, H.K., et al: ‘Experience of integrated operation of SCADA/EMS system at national level — a case study’. Power Systems Conf. (NPSC), 2014 Eighteenth National, Guwahati, 2014, pp. 16.
    2. 2)
      • 18. Suprême, H., Heniche-Oussédik, A., Kamwa, I., et al: ‘A novel approach for instability detection based on wide-area measurements and new predictors’. Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2016.
    3. 3)
      • 25. Lavand, S.A., Soman, S.A.: ‘Predictive analytic to supervise zone 1 of distance relay using synchrophasors’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2016, 31, (4), pp. 18441854.
    4. 4)
      • 13. Jena, M.K., Samantaray, S.R., Panigrahi, B.K.: ‘A new decentralized approach to wide-area back-up protection of transmission lines’, IEEE-Syst. J., 2018, 12, (4), pp. 31613168.
    5. 5)
      • 26. Mooney, J., Fischer, N.: ‘Application guidelines for power swing detection on transmission systems’. Proc. 59th Annu. Conf. Protect. Relay Eng., College Station, TX, USA, 2006, p. 10.
    6. 6)
      • 14. Gopakumar, P., Reddy, M.J.B., Mohanta, D.K.: ‘Transmission line fault detection and localisation methodology using PMU measurements’, IET Gener., Transmiss. Distrib., 2015, 9, (11), pp. 10331042.
    7. 7)
      • 3. Horwitz, S.H., Phadke, A.G.: ‘Third zone revisited’, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2006, 21, (1), pp. 2329.
    8. 8)
      • 22. Kamwa, I., Geoffroy, L., Samantaray, S.R., et al: ‘Synchrophasors data analytics framework for power grid control and dynamic stability monitoring’, IET Eng. Technol. Ref., 2016, pp. 122.
    9. 9)
      • 8. IEEE PSRC Working Group D4: ‘Application of overreaching distance relays’, 2009.
    10. 10)
      • 15. Navalkar, P.V., Soman, S.A.: ‘Secure remote back-up protection of transmission lines using synchrophasors’, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2011, 26, (1), pp. 8796.
    11. 11)
      • 1. North American Electric Reliability Council: ‘August 14, 2003 blackout: NERC actions to prevent and mitigate the impacts of future cascading blackouts’. Princeton, NJ, USA, February 10 2004.
    12. 12)
      • 21. Mahamedi, B.: ‘A novel setting-free method for fault classification and faulty phase selection by using a pilot scheme’. 2011 2nd Int. Conf. on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS), Sharjah, 2011, pp. 16.
    13. 13)
      • 5. Phadke, A.G., Thorp, J.S.: ‘Synchronized phasor measurements and their applications’ (Springer, New York, USA, 2008).
    14. 14)
      • 9. Kang, D., Gokaraju, R.: ‘A new method for blocking third-zone distance relays during stable power swings’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2016, 31, (4), pp. 18361843.
    15. 15)
      • 7. Phadke, A.G., Thorp, J.S.: ‘Communication needs for wide area measurement applications’. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Critical Infrastruct., Beijing, China, September 2010, pp. 17.
    16. 16)
      • 19. Supreme, H., Dessaint, L.A., Kamwa, I., et al: ‘Development of new predictors based on the concept of center of power for transient and dynamic instability detection’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2018, 9, (4), pp. 36053615.
    17. 17)
      • 11. Nayak, P.K., Pradhan, A.K., Bajpai, P.: ‘Wide- area measurement based back-up protection for power network with series compensation’, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2014, 29, (4), pp. 19701977.
    18. 18)
      • 6. Terzija, V., Valverde, G., Cai, D., et al: ‘Wide-area monitoring, protection, and control of future electric power networks’, Proc. IEEE, 2011, 99, (1), pp. 8093.
    19. 19)
      • 10. Eissa, M.M., Masoud, M.E., Elanwar, M.M.M.: ‘A novel back-up wide area protection technique for power transmission grids using phasor measurement unit’, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2010, 25, (1), pp. 270278.
    20. 20)
      • 4. (2003) Blackout Report of Denmark. [Online]. Available at http://www.geocities.jp/ps_dictionary/blackout/Final_report_uk-web.pdf.
    21. 21)
      • 2. (Aug. 8, 2012). Report on the Grid Disturbance on 30th July 2012 and Grid Disturbance on 31st July 2012. [Online]. Available at http://www.cercind.gov.in/2012/orders/Final_Report_Grid_Disturbance.pdf, accessed 12 August 2012.
    22. 22)
      • 17. Jena, M., Samantaray, S., Panigrahi, B.: ‘A new adaptive dependability-security approach to enhance wide area back-up protection of transmission system’, in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.
    23. 23)
      • 27. Ziegler, G.: ‘Numerical distance protection principles and application’ (Siemens-Erlangen Publicis, Germany, 1999).
    24. 24)
      • 12. Jena, M.K., Samantaray, S.R., Panigrahi, B.K.: ‘A New Wide-Area Backup Protection Scheme for Series-Compensated Transmission System’, IEEE-Syst. J., 2017, 11, (3), pp. 18771887.
    25. 25)
      • 16. He, Z., Zhang, Z., Chen, W., et al: ‘Wide-area backup protection algorithm based on fault component voltage distribution’, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2011, 26, (4), pp. 27522760.
    26. 26)
      • 23. IEEE standard for synchrophasor measurements for power systems -- amendment 1: modification of selected performance requirements’. in IEEE Std C37.118.1a-2014 (Amendment to IEEE Std C37.118.1-2011), April 30 2014, pp. 125.
    27. 27)
      • 24. Henville, C.F., Nagpal, M., Plumptre, F.: ‘Main 1 and main 2 protection—same or different?’. Proc. Western Protective Relay Conf., Spokane, WA, USA, 2008.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6208
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6208
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address