Economic risk-based bidding strategy for profit maximisation of wind-integrated day-ahead and real-time double-auctioned competitive power markets

Economic risk-based bidding strategy for profit maximisation of wind-integrated day-ahead and real-time double-auctioned competitive power markets

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy eFirst article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes a unique method of bidding strategy which is based on bi-level optimisation model for analysing the profits of the generation companies (GENCOs) and distribution companies in the day-ahead and real-time competitive power markets. The bi-level optimisation problem includes lower-level and upper-level problems. In the lower-level problem, market clearing model is presented, in which market clearing problem is solved, locational marginal price is minimised at load buses, net generation cost is also minimised with a simultaneous increase in profit with optimal placement of wind generator by assessing the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). In the upper level, the profit is maximised by selecting the proper bidding strategy based on double-auctioned market mechanism. To check the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, Monte Carlo simulation and scenario-based approach are used to generate the scenarios considering the random line outages, generator outages and load variations. The CVaR is used as a risk assessment tool for the uncertainties that would inadvertently affect the profit of the GENCOs. The proposed approach is applied to the modified IEEE 30-bus system to show the effectiveness of the proposed model and its impact on the bidders and suppliers.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Nicolaisen, J., Petrov, V., Tesfatsion, L.: ‘Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing’, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2001, 5, (5), pp. 504523.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Liu, G., Xu, Y., Tomsovic, K.: ‘Bidding strategy for microgrid in day-ahead market based on hybrid stochastic/robust optimization’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2016, 7, (1), pp. 227237.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Wang, X., Wang, X., Huang, M., et al: ‘A double auction method for resource management and bidding strategy on grid resources’. Int. Conf. Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, Shenzhen, China, December 2010, pp. 422425.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Flikkema, P.G.: ‘A multi-round double auction mechanism for local energy grids with distributed and centralized resources’. IEEE 25th Int. Symp. Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Santa Clara, CA, USA, June 2016, pp. 672677.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Faqiry, M.N., Das, S.: ‘Double-sided energy auction in microgrid: equilibrium under price anticipation’, IEEE Access, 2016, 4, pp. 37943805.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Kian, A.R., Cruz, J.B., Thomas, R.J.: ‘Bidding strategies in oligopolistic dynamic electricity double-sided auctions’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (1), pp. 5058.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Ren, Y., Galiana, F.D.: ‘Pay-as-bid versus marginal pricing – part I: strategic generator offers’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (4), pp. 17711776.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Reinisch, W., Tezuka, T.: ‘Market power and trading strategies on the electricity market: a market design view’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (3), pp. 11801190.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Guerrero-Mestre, V., de la Nieta, A.A.S., Contreras, J., et al: ‘Optimal bidding of a group of wind farms in day-ahead markets through an external agent’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2016, 31, (4), pp. 26882700.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Xu, Z., Hu, Z., Song, Y., et al: ‘Risk-averse optimal bidding strategy for demand-side resource aggregators in day-ahead electricity markets under uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2017, 8, (1), pp. 96105.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Cason, T.N., Gangadharan, L.: ‘A laboratory comparison of uniform and discriminative price auctions for reducing non-point source pollution’, Land Econ., 2005, 81, (1), pp. 5170.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Baringo, L., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Offering strategy of wind power producer: a multi-stage risk-constrained approach’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2016, 31, (2), pp. 14201429.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Aliabadi, D.E., Kaya, M., Sahin, G.: ‘Competition, risk and learning in electricity markets: an agent based simulation study’, Appl. Energy, 2017, 195, pp. 10001011.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Wang, Q., Zhang, G., McCalley, J.D., et al: ‘Risk-based locational marginal pricing and congestion management’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (5), pp. 25182528.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Xu, Y., Low, S.H.: ‘An efficient and incentive compatible mechanism for wholesale electricity markets’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2017, 8, (1), pp. 14201429.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Nguyen, D.T., Le, L.B.: ‘Risk-constrained profit maximization for microgrid aggregators with demand response’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2015, 6, (1), pp. 135146.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Forushani, E.H., Moghaddam, M.P., Eslami, M.K.S.E., et al: ‘Risk-constrained offering strategy of wind power producers considering intraday demand response exchange’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 5, (4), pp. 10361047.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Ansari, B., Kian, A.R.: ‘A dynamic risk-constrained bidding strategy for generation companies based on linear supply function model’, IEEE Syst. J., 2015, 9, (4), pp. 14631474.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Dai, T., Qiao, W.: ‘Optimal bidding strategy of a strategic wind power producer in the short-term market’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (3), pp. 707719.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Wu, J., Zhang, B., Wang, K., et al: ‘Optimal economic dispatch model based on risk management for wind-integrated power system’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2015, 9, (15), pp. 21522158.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Abdin, I., Li, Y.F., Zio, E.: ‘Risk assessment of power transmission network failures in a uniform pricing electricity market environment’, Energy, 2017, 138, pp. 10421055.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Rocchetta, R., Li, Y.F., Zio, E.: ‘Risk assessment and risk-cost optimization of distributed power generation systems considering extreme weather conditions’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2015, 136, pp. 4761.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Savelli, I., Giannitrapani, A., Paoletti, S., et al: ‘An optimization model for the electricity market clearing problem with uniform purchase price and zonal selling prices’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2018, 33, (3), pp. 28642873.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Dagoumas, A.S., Koltsaklis, N.E., Panapakidis, I.P.: ‘An integrated model for risk management in electricity trade’, Energy, 2017, 124, pp. 350363.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Vardanyan, Y., Hesamzadeh, M.R.: ‘The coordinated bidding of a hydropower producer in three-settlement markets with time-dependent risk measure’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2017, 151, pp. 4058.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Zimmerman, R.D.: ‘Uniform price auctions and optimal power flow’. MATPOWER Technical Note 1, February 2010.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Heitschand, H., Romisch, W.: ‘Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming’, Comput. Optim. Appl., 2003, 24, pp. 187206.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: ‘Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions’, J. Bank Finance, 2002, 26, (7), pp. 14431471.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Li, T., Shahidehpour, M.: ‘Strategic bidding of transmission-constrained GENCOs with incomplete information’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (1), pp. 437447.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Zimmerman, R.D., Murillo-Sanchez, C.E., Gan, D.: ‘MATPOWER: a MATLAB power system simulation package’, 2006. Available at, accessed July 2017.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address