Multi-attribute analysis on voltage sag insurance mechanisms and their feasibility for sensitive customers

Multi-attribute analysis on voltage sag insurance mechanisms and their feasibility for sensitive customers

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Nowadays, more and more high-tech enterprises pay great attention to the enormous losses and risks caused by voltage sag. There is an urgent desire for voltage sag insurance. However, a feasible insurance mechanism is not yet available. Relationships among stakeholders (customers, insurance institution, power utility and government) are studied based on the analysis of insurability of voltage sag loss risk, and three possible voltage sag insurance mechanisms are proposed. Multi-objective two-stage decision-making method is introduced to combine the expectations of attributes of mechanisms for different stakeholders; the proposed method can simplify the fuzziness and the complexity of evaluating the process. This method combines the integrating scattered information into effective evaluation information, and it can reflect the recognition of different mechanisms by all the stakeholders objectively. This method can determine voltage sag insurance mechanisms, which are with the high feasibility to satisfy the requirement of all the stakeholders and to make sure all attributes are in good condition. Finally, the results of case studies for three high-tech customers located in the high-tech park have proved the correctness and rationality of the recommended insurance mechanism.


    1. 1)
      • 1. CIGRE/CIRED Joint Working Group C4.107: ‘Economic framework for power quality’ (CIGRE/CIRED, Paris, France, 2011).
    2. 2)
      • 2. Milanovic, J.V., Gupta, C.P.: ‘Probabilistic assessment of financial losses due to interruptions and voltage sags – part I: the methodology’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2006, 21, (2), pp. 918924.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Chan, J.Y., Milanovic, J.V., Delahunty, A.: ‘Risk-based assessment of financial losses due to voltage sag’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 492500.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Chan, J.Y., Milanovic, J.V., Delahunty, A.: ‘Generic failure-risk assessment of industrial processes due to voltage sags’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2009, 24, (4), pp. 24052414.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Chan, J.Y., Milanovic, J.V.: ‘Assessment of the economic value of voltage sag mitigation devices to sensitive industrial plants’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2015, 30, (6), pp. 23742382.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Somayajula, D., Crow, M.L.: ‘An integrated dynamic voltage restorer-ultracapacitor design for improving power quality of the distribution grid’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (2), pp. 616624.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Milanovic, J.V., Zhang, Y.: ‘Global minimization of financial losses due to voltage sags with FACTS based devices’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2010, 25, (1), pp. 298306.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Xiao, X.Y., Ma, Y.Q., Zhang, Y., et al: ‘Premium power valuation method based on customer perception of utility for high-technology manufacturing customers’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2016, 31, (4), pp. 16551662.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Patne, N.R., Thakre, K.L.: ‘Effect of transformer type on estimation of financial loss due to voltage sag – PSCAD/EMTDC simulation study’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2010, 4, (1), pp. 104114.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Cebrian, J.C., Milanovic, J.V., Kagan, N.: ‘Probabilistic assessment of financial losses in distribution network due to fault-induced process interruptions considering process immunity time’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2015, 30, (3), pp. 14781486.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Li, S., Li, Y., Cao, Y., et al: ‘Capacity optimisation method of distribution static synchronous compensator considering the risk of voltage sag in high-voltage distribution networks’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2015, 9, (16), pp. 26022610.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Wang, X., Li, C.H., Li, H.Q.: ‘Economic losses risk assessment of industrial users due to voltage sags based on uncertainty of process immunity’. IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conf., Xi'an, 2016, pp. 11391142.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Cavalcanti, M.C., Limongi, L.R., Gomes, M.D.B., et al: ‘Eight-switch power conditioner for current harmonic compensation and voltage sag mitigation’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2015, 62, (8), pp. 46554664.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Jothibasu, S., Mishra, M.K.: ‘An improved direct AC–AC converter for voltage sag mitigation’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2015, 62, (1), pp. 2129.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Dettloff, A., Sabin, D.: ‘Power quality performance component of the special manufacturing contracts between power provider and customer’. Int. Conf. Harmonics and Quality of Power, Orlando, 2000.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Cajamarca, G., Torres, H., Pavas, A., et al: ‘A methodological proposal for the estimation of optimal power levels’. Power Systems Conf. and Exposition, Atlanta, 2006.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Li, C.S., Chen, Y.Z., Xiao, X.Y., et al: ‘Quantitative analysis on insurance mechanisms for voltage sag’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2017, 41, (14), pp. 99104(in Chinese).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Ye, Y., Yao, N., Wang, Q., et al: ‘A method of ranking interval numbers based on degrees for multiple attribute decision making’, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2015, 31, (1), pp. 211221.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Dahlström, K., Skea, J., Stahel, W.R.: ‘Innovation, insurability and sustainable development: sharing risk management between insurers and the state’, Geneva Pap. Risk Insur. Issues Pract., 2003, 28, (3), pp. 394412.
    20. 20)
      • 20. IEEE Standard 1159. IEEE recommended practice for monitoring electric power quality, 1995.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Heine, P., Lehtonen, M.: ‘Voltage sag distributions caused by power system faults’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2003, 18, (4), pp. 13671373.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Bollen, M.H.J., Das, R., Djokic, S., et al: ‘Power quality concerns in implementing smart distribution-grid applications’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2016, 8, (1), pp. 391399.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Wang, Y., Bollen, M.H.J., Xiao, X.Y.: ‘Calculation of the phase-angle-jump for voltage dips in three-phase systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2015, 30, (1), pp. 480487.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Bollen, M.H.J., Cundeva, S., Gordon, J.M.R.: ‘Voltage dip immunity aspects of power-electronics equipment-recommendations from CIGRE/CIRED/UIE JWG C4.110’. Presented at 14th Int. Conf. Power Electronics and Motion Control Conf., Lisbon, Portugal, 2010, pp. 1724.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Jones, R.N., Preston, B.L.: ‘Adaptation and risk management’, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 2015, 2, (2), pp. 296308.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International: ‘Specification for semiconductor processing equipment voltage sag immunity’, SEMI Std. F47-0200, San Jose, CA, 2000.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Thallam, R.S., Heydt, G.T.: ‘Power acceptability and voltage sag indices in the three phase sense’. IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Seattle, WA, USA, July 2000, vol. 2, pp. 905910.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Elphick, S., Smith, V.: ‘The 230 V CBEMA curve – preliminary studies’. 2010 20th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conf., Christchurch, 2010, pp. 16.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Kunreuther, H.C., Michel-Kerjan, E.O.: ‘Risk transfer and insurance: insurability concepts and programs for covering extreme events’, in Voeller, J.G. (Ed.): ‘Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008), pp. 207222.
    30. 30)
      • 30. CIGRE/CIRED/UIE Joint Working Group C4.110: ‘Voltage dip immunity of equipment and installations’ (CIGRE, Paris, France, 2010).
    31. 31)
      • 31. Zhou, C., Wu, W., Wu, C.: ‘Optimal insurance in the presence of insurer's loss limit’, Insur. Math. Econ., 2010, 46, (2), pp. 300307.
    32. 32)
      • 32. Ogasawara, E., Martinez, L.C., Oliveira, D.D., et al: ‘Adaptive normalization: a novel data normalization approach for non-stationary time series’. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, Barcelona, 2010, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 18.
    33. 33)
      • 33. Conrad, L.E., Bollen, M.H.J.: ‘Voltage sag coordination for reliable plant operation’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 1997, 33, (6), pp. 14591464.
    34. 34)
      • 34. Dorr, D.S.: ‘Point of utilization power quality study results’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 1995, 31, (4), pp. 658666.
    35. 35)
      • 35. Bollen, M.H.J.: ‘Understanding power quality problems: voltage sags and interruptions’ (Wiley-IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1999).
    36. 36)
      • 36. Kwadjo, A.A., Andoh, C., Abor, J.: ‘Evaluating the cost efficiency of insurance companies in Ghana’, J. Risk Financ., 2012, 13, (1), pp. 6176.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address