Toward online multi-period power dispatch with AC constraints and renewable energy

Toward online multi-period power dispatch with AC constraints and renewable energy

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, a comprehensive online multi-period power dispatch formulation that takes AC constraints, renewable energy, and ramping constraints into account is proposed. The AC power flow equations, voltage limits, and thermal limits are respected to ensure the obtained solution causes no static violation while guaranteeing transfer capability. A four-stage solution methodology is proposed to solve the non-linear constrained optimisation problem in which the thermal limit constraints are equivalently represented by active-set-based constraints in the third stage, and an adaptive homotopy-enhanced primal-dual interior point method (PDIPM) in solving power dispatch problem is presented in the fourth stage to reliably and efficiently obtain the solution. This solution methodology enhances both the robustness and speed of the PDIPM. The proposed four-stage solution methodology has been evaluated on several testing systems, ranging from a 30-bus system to a 3012-bus system with four time periods, with promising results.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Peng, X., Jirutitijaroen, P.: ‘Two-stage adjustable robust optimization for unit commitment under uncertainty’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2014, 8, (3), pp. 573582.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Ding, T., Zhao, C.: ‘Robust optimal transmission switching with the consideration of corrective actions for N − k contingencies’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2016, 10, (13), pp. 32883295.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Aghaei, J, Alizadeh, M.I.: ‘Robust nk, contingency constrained unit commitment with ancillary service demand response program’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, 8, (12), pp. 19281936.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Lu, Z., Zhao, H., Xiao, H., et al: ‘Robust DED based on bad scenario set considering wind, EV and battery switching station’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, 11, (2), pp. 354362.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Lorca, Á., Sun, X.A.: ‘Adaptive robust optimization with dynamic uncertainty sets for multi-period economic dispatch under significant wind’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 30, (4), pp. 17021713.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Xie, L., Gu, Y., Zhu, X., et al: ‘Short-term spatio-temporal wind power forecast in robust look-ahead power system dispatch’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2014, 5, (1), pp. 511520.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Yu, H., Rosehart, W.D.: ‘An optimal power flow algorithm to achieve robust operation considering load and renewable generation uncertainties’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (4), pp. 18081817.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Jabr, R.A.: ‘Adjustable robust OPF with renewable energy sources’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 47424751.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Li, Z., Wu, W., Zhang, B., et al: ‘Adjustable robust real-time power dispatch with large-scale wind power integration’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (2), pp. 357368.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Ding, T., Wu, Z., Lv, J., et al: ‘Robust Co-optimization to energy and ancillary service joint dispatch considering wind power uncertainties in real-time electricity markets’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2016, 7, (4), pp. 15471557.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Lee, Y.Y., Baldick, R.: ‘A frequency-constrained stochastic economic dispatch model’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (3), pp. 23012312.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Gu, Y., Xie, L.: ‘Stochastic look-ahead economic dispatch with variable generation resources’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (1), pp. 1729.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Meibom, P., Barth, R., Hasche, B., et al: ‘Stochastic optimization model to study the operational impacts of high wind penetrations in Ireland’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 13671379.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Liu, Y., Nair, N.K.C.: ‘A two-stage stochastic dynamic economic dispatch model considering wind uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2016, 7, (2), pp. 819829.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Gangammanavar, H., Sen, S., Zavala, V.M.: ‘Stochastic optimization of sub-hourly economic dispatch with wind energy’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2016, 31, (2), pp. 949959.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Jovanović, N., García-González, J., Barquín, J., et al: ‘Electricity market short-term risk management via risk-adjusted probability measures’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, 11, (10), pp. 25992607.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Zhang, H., Li, P.: ‘Chance constrained programming for optimal power flow under uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (4), pp. 24172424.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Vrakopoulou, M., Margellos, K., Lygeros, J., et al: ‘A probabilistic framework for reserve scheduling and N–1 security assessment of systems with high wind power penetration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 38853896.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Yu, H., Chung, C.Y., Wong, K.P., et al: ‘A chance constrained transmission network expansion planning method with consideration of load and wind farm uncertainties’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (3), pp. 15681576.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Nosair, H., Bouffard, F.: ‘Economic dispatch under uncertainty: the probabilistic envelopes approach’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (3), pp. 17011710.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Wang, T., Chiang, H.D., Tanabe, R.: ‘Toward a flexible scenario generation tool for stochastic renewable energy analysis’. 2016 Power Systems Computation Conf. (PSCC), Genoa, Italy, June 2016, pp. 17.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Wang, T., Chiang, H.D.: ‘On the global convergence of a class of homotopy methods for nonlinear circuits and systems’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs, 2014, 61, (11), pp. 900904.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Chiang, H.D., Zhao, T.Q., Deng, J.J., et al: ‘Homotopy-enhanced power flow methods for general distribution networks with distributed generators’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (1), pp. 93100.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address