Assessment of regional transmission connection capacity based on two novel indices

Assessment of regional transmission connection capacity based on two novel indices

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In deregulated market environments, transmission system expansion planning becomes a troublesome task as transmission system operators lose their direct control over plant investments. Moreover, the increase in the share of renewable sources in electricity generation creates an uncertainty about future generation investments in terms of location and size. Assessment of transmission connection capacities, which determines the boundaries of new generation amount that can safely be connected from a region, is a mechanism that facilitates economic and reliable transmission expansion. In this study, use of two novel indices, namely region-based evaluation index (REI) and line-based evaluation index (LEI), is proposed for this purpose. REI aims to indicate the suitability of a region for new generation investments from a holistic point of view. Its calculation is based on the loadings of the lines under N − 1 conditions, and their overloading probabilities. LEI, on the other hand, is usable to assess each variation of the considered line's loading. By tracking LEI of a line, one can follow if a line's loading exceeds limits during contingencies, and observe if the loading benefits from additional generation. It allows identifying the weak points of the analysed system. The proposed methodology was demonstrated on projected Turkish Transmission Network model of 2026.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Yixin, N., Zhong, J., Liu, H.: ‘Deregulation of power systems in Asia: special consideration in developing countries’. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 2005, pp. 28762881.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Abhyankar, A.R., Khaparde, S.A.: ‘Introduction to deregulation in power industry’, 2017. Available at, accessed 1 June 2017.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Kristiansen, T.: ‘Congestion management, transmission pricing and area price hedging in the nordic region’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2004, 26, pp. 685695.
    4. 4)
      • 4. North American Electric Reliability Council: ‘Available transfer capability definitions and determination’, (June 1996), pp. 12.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Makwana, U.L., Joshi, S.K., Solanki, M.D.: ‘Assessment of available transfer capability for congestion management in restructured electrical power network for competent operation’, J. Power Energy Eng., 2014, 2, pp. 395402.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Ejebe, G.C., Tong, J., Waight, J.G., et al: ‘Available transfer capability calculations’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1998, 13, (4), pp. 15211527.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Ou, Y., Singh, C.: ‘Assessment of available transfer capability and margins’, IEEE Tran. Power Syst.’, 2002, 17, (2), pp. 463468.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Ejebe, G.C., Waight, J.G., Santos-Nieto, M., et al: ‘Fast calculation of linear available transfer capability’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2000, 15, (3), pp. 11121116.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Guguloth, R., Sunil Kumar, T.K.: ‘Optimal power flow-based congestion management in restructured power systems’, Int. J. Power Energy Convers., 2016, 7, (1), pp. 8486.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Saini, A., Saxena, A.: ‘Optimal power flow based congestion management methods for competitive electricity markets’, Int. J. Comput. Electr. Eng., 2010, 2, (1), pp. 7380.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Eskom: ‘Generation connection capacity assessment of 2016 transmission network (GCCA-2016)’, 2017. Available at, accessed 10 May 2017.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Güverçinci, A.H., Eren, S., Yanık, Y., et al: ‘Determination of regional transmission connection capacities in a deregulated environment’. 9th Int. Conf. Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO), Bursa, Turkey, November 2015, pp. 555558.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Scutariu, M.: ‘Assessment of the transmission system capacity to connect new generation’ (IEEE Bucharest PowerTech, Bucharest, Romania, 2009), pp. 16.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Grijalva, S., Visnesky, A.M.: ‘Assessment of distributed generation programs based on transmission security benefits’. Power Engineering Society General Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 2005, pp. 14411446.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Rubio-Oderiz, F.J., Perez-Arriaga, I.J.: ‘Marginal pricing of transmission services: a comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2000, 15, (1), pp. 448454.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Konstantinidis, C.V., Strbac, G., Pudjianto, D., et al: ‘European transmission tariff harmonization: A modeling analysis’. 2012 9th Conf. the European Energy Market (EEM), Florence, Italy, May 2012, pp. 17.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Shawhan, D., Taber, J., Zimmerman, R., et al: ‘A detailed power system planning model: estimating the long-Run impact of carbon-reducing policies’. 2015 48th Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, HI, USA, January 2015, pp. 24972506.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Klump, R.P., Overbye, T.J.: ‘Assessment of transmission system loadability’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1997, 12, (1), pp. 416423.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Lammintausta, M., Hirvonen, R., Lehtonen, M.: ‘Transmission capacity assessment by using simple probabilistic planning’. Proc. 2003 Bologna Power Tech, Bologna, Italy, June 2003, pp. 18.
    20. 20)
      • 20. European Transmission System Operators: ‘Procedures for cross-border transmission capacity assessments’, October 2001, pp. 113.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Popovic, D.P., Dobrijevic, D.M., Mijailovic, S.V., et al: ‘Automatic cross-border transmission capacity assessment in the open electricity market environment’. Proc. 24 Session CIGRE, Paris, 29 August- 3 September 2004, pp. C2209.
    22. 22)
      • 22. European Transmission System Operators: ‘Report on blackout in Turkey for on 31 march 2015’, 2015. Available at, accessed May 2017.
    23. 23)
      • 23. TÜBİTAK MAM Energy Institute: ‘National, regional and substation based long term load forecast study on Turkish electricity system 2017–2026 period’ (Ankara, 2016).
    24. 24)
      • 24. TÜBİTAK MAM Energy Institute: ‘Generation forecast study on Turkish electricity system 2017–2026 period’ (Ankara, 2016).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address