Evaluation of controlled energisation of an unloaded power transformer for minimising the level of inrush current and transient voltage distortion using PIR-CBs

Evaluation of controlled energisation of an unloaded power transformer for minimising the level of inrush current and transient voltage distortion using PIR-CBs

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study presents an evaluation of the application of the controlled switching device for reducing the level of inrush current and transient voltage dip (TVD) during energisation of an unloaded power transformer using circuit breaker having pre-insertion resistor (PIR-CB). This evaluation is achieved by analysing the effect of statistical scatter of mechanical operating time (MOT), tolerance of auxiliary contact used as a feedback for a controlled switching device, and variation in mechanical insertion time (MIT) and electrical insertion time (EIT) of the PIR-CB. The modelling of a complete system consisting of a power source, PIR-CB, and two types of power transformers (electrically and magnetically coupled) is carried out using power systems computer-aided design/electro-magnetic transient design and control (PSCAD/EMTDC) software package. The results obtained from the simulations are compared with the results obtained during energisation of similar transformers in the real field. Finally, the performance of PIR-CB-based proposed methodology has been compared with the conventional methodology (non-PIR-CB) with reference to mitigation of inrush and TVD. The close match between field results and that obtained with simulation for both electrically and magnetically coupled transformers authenticate the proposed methodology.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Brunke, J.H., Frohlich, K.J.: ‘Elimination of transformer inrush currents by controlled switching – part I: application and performance considerations’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2001, 16, (2), pp. 281285.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Brunke, J.H., Frohlich, K.J.: ‘Elimination of transformer inrush currents by controlled switching – part II: application and performance considerations’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2001, 16, (2), pp. 281285.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Sidhu, T.S., Sachdev, M.S.: ‘Online identification of magnetizing inrush and internal faults in three-phase transformers’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1992, 7, (4), pp. 18851891.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Parikh, U., Bhalja, B.R.: ‘Mitigation of magnetic inrush current during controlled energization of coupled un-loaded power transformers in presence of residual flux without load side voltage measurements’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2016, 76, pp. 156164.
    5. 5)
      • 5. IEEE Std. 1159: ‘IEEE recommended practice for monitoring electric power quality’, 2009.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Nagpal, M., Martinich, T.G., Moshref, A., et al: ‘Assessing and limiting impact of transformer inrush current on power quality’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2006, 21, (2), pp. 890896.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Maheshwari, R.P., Verma, H.K.: ‘Adaptive digital differential relay with overexcitation and inrush restraint’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 1997, 41, (3), pp. 175184.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Samantaray, S.R., Dash, P.K.: ‘Decision tree based discrimination between inrush currents and internal faults in power transformer’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2011, 33, (4), pp. 10431048.
    9. 9)
      • 9. de Leon, F., Farazmand, A., Jazebi, S., et al: ‘Elimination of residual flux in transformers by the application of an alternating polarity DC voltage source’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2015, 30, (4), pp. 17271734.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Kovan, B., De Leon, F., Czarkowski, D., et al: ‘Mitigation of inrush currents in network transformers by reducing the residual flux with an ultra-low-frequency power source’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 15631570.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Goldsworthy, D., Roseburg, T., Tziouvaras, D., et al: ‘Controlled switching of HVAC circuit breakers: application examples and benefits’. 61st Annual Conf. Protective Relay Engineers, College Station, TX, USA, April 2008, pp. 520535.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Legate, A.C., Brunke, J.H., Ray, J.J., et al: ‘Elimination of closing resistors on EHV circuit breakers’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1988, 3, (1), pp. 223231.
    13. 13)
      • 13. CIGRE Task Force 13 00 1: ‘Controlled switching: a state of the art survey – Part I’, Electra, 1995, 162, pp. 6597.
    14. 14)
      • 14. CIGRE Task Force 13.00.1: ‘Controlled switching: a state of the art survey – Part II’, Electra, 1996, 164, pp. 3961.
    15. 15)
      • 15. ABB High Voltage Products: ‘Controlled switching buyer's and application guide’, 2013.
    16. 16)
      • 16. ABB substation automation products: ‘SwitchsyncTM PWC600 product guide’, 2013.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Ito, H.: ‘Controlled switching technologies, state-of-the-art’. IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conf. Exhibition, Yokohama, Japan, October 2002, pp. 14551460.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Chandrasena, W., Jacobson, D., Wang, P.: ‘Controlled switching of a 1200 MVA transformer in Manitoba’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2016, 31, (5), pp. 23902400.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Bhalja, B.R., Maheshwari, R.P., Chothani, N.: ‘Protection and switch gear’ (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India, 2011, 2nd edn.).
    20. 20)
      • 20. Blackburn, J.L., Domin, T.J.: ‘Protective relaying principles and applications’ (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006, 3rd edn.).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Hu, J., Bisewski, B., Sherry, R., et al: ‘Converter transformer inrush control using hybrid pre-insertion resistors and point-on-wave switching in the New Zealand HVDC system’. CIGRE Sessions, Paris, France, August 2016, pp. 18.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Smith, Z., Collette, L., Yonezawa, T.: ‘Controlled switching for circuit breakers with pre-insertion resistors energizing shunt capacitor banks’. CIGRE – IEC Colloquium, Montreal, Canada, 9–11 May 2016, pp. 17.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Heiermeier, H., Raysaha, R.B.: ‘Power testing of preinsertion resistors: limitations and solution’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2017, 32, (4), pp. 16881695.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Charles, L., Wangner, J.W.B.: ‘Evaluation of surge suppression resistors in high voltage CB’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1967, 86, (6), pp. 66112.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Bhatt, K.A., Bhalja, B.R., Parikh, U.: ‘Evaluation of controlled energization of shunt reactors for minimizing asymmetric DC component of charging current with circuit breaker having pre-insertion resistors’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2017, 93, pp. 340351.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Manitoba-HVDC Research Center: ‘PSCAD/EMTDC User's Manual Version 4.2’, 2005, pp. 1492.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Committee, T., Power, I., Society, E.: ‘IEEE std. C57.21TM-2008 (revision of IEEE Std. C57.21-1990), IEEE standard requirements, terminology, and test code for shunt reactors rated over 500 kVA’, 2008.
    28. 28)
      • 28. This is a part of the Cigrè Technical Brochure (TB 568) – “Transformer energization in power system: a study guide”, Working Group C4.307, February 2014’, 2014.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Tripathy, M., Maheshwari, R.P., Verma, H.K.: ‘Power transformer differential protection based on optimal probabilistic neural network’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2010, 25, (1), pp. 102112.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Parikh, U., Bhalja, B.R.: ‘Challenges in field implementation of controlled energization for various equipment loads with circuit breakers considering diversified dielectric and mechanical characteristics’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2017, 87, pp. 99108.
    31. 31)
      • 31. Switchgear, V.: ‘IS/IEC 62271-203: 2003, ‘High voltage switchgear and control gear’’ (Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India, 2008).
    32. 32)
      • 32. International Electrotechnical Commission: ‘IEC-TR-62271-302, ‘High-voltage switchgear and control gear’’, 2010.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address