Intentional controlled islanding: when to island for power system blackout prevention

Intentional controlled islanding: when to island for power system blackout prevention

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Power systems are prone to cascading outages leading to large-area blackouts with significant social and economic consequences. Intentional controlled islanding (i.e. the separation of the system into sustainable islands) is an effective strategy to mitigate these catastrophic events. To ensure a correct separation, nonetheless, it is crucial to define a suitable time to split the system (i.e. to answer the when to island question). To consider the probability of the event, the reliability of the system components, the reliability of the information and communication technologies, and the potential economic costs of the event, answering the above question within a risk-based framework becomes critical. To date, however, this has not been done. This study proposes a risk-based methodology to define, in an adaptive manner, a suitable time to split the system following an event. This methodology complements the well-studied where to island question, resulting in an integral solution of the islanding problem. To illustrate the approach, the IEEE 118-bus dynamic system is adopted considering realistic security criteria. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and flexibility of the methodology in identifying a suitable time for the creation of islands, which, in turn, results in the prevention of blackouts that would otherwise be obtained.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Dulau, L., Abrudean, M., Bica, D.: ‘Effects of distributed generation on electric power systems’. 7th Int. Conf. Interdisciplinarity in Engineering (INTER-ENG 2013), Tirgu Mures, Romania, January 2014, pp. 681686.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Vaiman, M., Bell, K., Chen, Y., et al: ‘Risk assessment of cascading outages: methodologies and challenges’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (2), pp. 631641.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Lu, W., Bésanger, Y., Zamai, E., et al: ‘Blackouts: description, analysis and classification’. WSEAS Int. Conf. on Power Systems, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2006, pp. 429434.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Sun, K., Hur, K., Zhang, P.: ‘A new unified scheme for controlled power system separation using synchronized phasor measurements’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 15441554.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Senroy, N., Heydt, G.T., Vittal, V.: ‘Decision tree assisted controlled islanding’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (4), pp. 17901797.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Senroy, N., Heydt, G.T.: ‘Timing of a controlled islanding strategy’. Transmission and Distribution Conf. and Exhibition, IEEE PES, Dallas, USA, May 2006, pp. 14601466.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Adibi, M.M., Kafka, R.J., Maram, S., et al: ‘On power system controlled separation’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (4), pp. 18941902.
    8. 8)
      • 8. You, H., Vittal, V., Yang, Z.: ‘Self-healing in power systems: an approach using islanding and rate of frequency decline-based load shedding’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 18, (1), pp. 174181.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Quirós-Tortós, J., Sánchez-García, R., Brodzki, J., et al: ‘Constrained spectral clustering-based methodology for intentional controlled islanding of large-scale power systems’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2015, 9, (1), pp. 112.
    10. 10)
      • 10. McCalley, J., Fu, W.: ‘Reliability of special protection schemes’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1999, 14, (4), pp. 14001406.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Panteli, M., Crossley, P.A., Fitch, J.: ‘Quantifying the reliability level of system integrity protection schemes’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2014, 8, (4), pp. 753764.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Fernández-Porras, P., Panteli, M., Quirós-Tortós, J.: ‘A risk-based methodology for defining the time of intentional controlled islanding’. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LATAM), 2015 IEEE PES, Montevideo, Uruguay, October 2015, pp. 828832.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Regulatory Authority of Public Services (ARESEP).: ‘Planning, operation and access to the national electric system (ar-nt-poasen-2014, in Spanish)’, Costa Rica, 2014.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Li, W., Zhou, J.Q.: ‘Probabilistic reliability assessment of power system operations’, Electr. Power Compon. Syst., 2008, 36, (10), pp. 11021114.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Vesely, W.E, Goldberg, F.F., Roberts, N.H., et al: ‘Fault tree handbook (NUREG-0492)’ (Division of Technical Information and Document Control U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 1981), Ch. 4, pp. 111.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Von Luxburg, U.: ‘A tutorial on spectral clustering’, Stat. Comput., 2007, 17, (4), pp. 395416.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Hsiao, T.Y., Lu, C.N.: ‘Risk informed design refinement of a power system protection scheme’, IEEE Trans. Reliab., 2008, 57, (2), pp. 311321.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Demetriou, P., Asprou, M., Quirós-Tortós, J., et al: ‘Dynamic IEEE test systems for transient analysis’, IEEE Syst. J., 2017, 11, (4), pp. 21082117.
    19. 19)
      • 19. DIgSILENT PowerFactory, Heinrich-Hertz-Straße, Germany.
    20. 20)
      • 20. MATLAB R2010a’ (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, 2010), available at DIgSILENT PowerFactory,, accessed January 2017.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address