Real-time optimal management of reverse power flow in integrated power and gas distribution grids under large renewable power penetration

Real-time optimal management of reverse power flow in integrated power and gas distribution grids under large renewable power penetration

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Exponential penetration of renewable generation has led to the new issues in power distribution systems, such as reverse power flow in the feeders. In the case of sizable distributed generation during lower demand, the power tends to travel in the reverse direction. This, in turn, could cause serious operational issues such as voltage rise, extra heat in the transformers, and maloperation of protective devices. Newly emerging technologies for power-to-gas (PtG) conversion are now offering effective solutions to the problem. The proliferation of PtG facilities can lead to the deployment of integrated natural gas and power systems in the near future. PtG and gas-fired, i.e. gas-to-power (GtP), units can be utilised to address several issues in an integrated power and gas network. This study unveils the application of bi-directional energy converters within an integrated gas and power system for distribution system reverse power management (DSRPM). To that end, a new real-time algorithm is proposed for optimal joint scheduling of PtG and GtP units for DSRPM. A new index is also developed that would quantify the contribution of the PtG–GtP system to DSRPM. Numerical results using real-world data on a test system substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Hossain, M.I., Yan, R., Saha, T.S.: ‘Investigation of the interaction between step voltage regulators and large-scale photovoltaic systems regarding voltage regulation and unbalance’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (3), pp. 299309.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Alam, M.J.E., Muttaqi, K.M., Sutanto, D.: ‘Mitigation of rooftop solar PV impacts and evening peak support by managing available capacity of distributed energy storage systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 38743884.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Ziadi, Z., Taira, S., Oshiro, M., et al: ‘Optimal power scheduling for smart grids considering controllable loads and high penetration of photovoltaic generation’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2014, 5, (5), pp. 23502359.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Brusco, G., Burgio, A., Menniti, D., et al: ‘Energy management system for an energy district with demand response availability’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2014, 5, (5), pp. 23852393.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Boemer, J.C., Rawn, B.G., Gibescu, M., et al: ‘Response of wind power park modules in distribution systems to transmission network faults during reverse power flows’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2015, 9, (8), pp. 10331042.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Hashemi, S., Ostergaard, J.: —‘ Methods and strategies for overvoltage prevention in low voltage distribution systems with PV’, IET Renew. Power. Gener., 2016, 11, (2), pp. 205214.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Tabari, M., Yazdani, A.: ‘An energy management strategy for a DC distribution system for power system integration of plug–in electric vehicles’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2016, 7, (2), pp. 659668.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Camilo, F.M., Castro, R., Almeida, M.E., et al: ‘Self-consumption and storage as a way to facilitate the integration of renewable energy in low voltage distribution networks’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2016, 10, (7), pp. 17411748.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Carne, G.D., Buticchi, G., Zou, Z.X., et al: ‘Reverse power flow control in a ST–fed distribution grid’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2017, PP, (99), pp. 19, DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2651147.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Jabr, R.A., Dzafic, I., Huseinagic, I.: ‘Real time optimal reconfiguration of multiphase active distribution networks’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2017, PP, (99), pp. 111, DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2724766.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Zeng, Q., Fang, J., Li, J., et al: ‘Steady-state analysis of the integrated natural gas and electric power system with bi–directional energy conversion’, Appl. Energy J., 2016, 184, (15), pp. 14831492.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Clegg, S., Mancarella, P.: ‘Storing renewables in the gas network: modelling of power-to-gas seasonal storage flexibility in low-carbon power systems’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2016, 10, (3), pp. 566575.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Huang, J.H., Zhou, H.S., Wu, Q.H., et al: ‘Assessment of an integrated energy system embedded with power–to–gas plant’. Proc. IEEE Conf. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies – Asia, Australia, December 2016, pp. 196201.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Chen, S., Wei, Z., Sun, G., et al: ‘Multi–linear probabilistic energy flow analysis of integrated electrical and natural–gas systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (3), pp. 19701979.
    15. 15)
      • 15. He, C., Wu, L., Liu, T., et al: ‘Robust co-optimization scheduling of electricity and natural gas systems via ADMM’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2017, 8, (2), pp. 658670.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Baran, M.E., Wu, F.F.: ‘Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1989, 4, (2), pp. 14011407.
    17. 17)
      • 17. IESO Report: ‘Energy Storage’, IESO, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2016, pp. 160. Available at
    18. 18)
      • 18. Evangelopoulos, V.A., Georgilakis, P.S.: ‘Optimal distributed generation placement under uncertainties based on point estimate method embedded genetic algorithm’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2014, 8, (3), pp. 389400.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Liu, H., Tang, C., Han, J., et al: ‘Probabilistic load flow analysis of active distribution network adopting improved sequence operation methodology’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, 11, (9), pp. 21472153.
    20. 20)
      • 20. ‘The Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO)’. Available at, accessed 9 September 2017.
    21. 21)
      • 21. The Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Plan: ‘An integrated strategic plan for the research, development, and demonstration of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies’. Available at
    22. 22)
      • 22. ANSI Std. C84.1: ‘American national standard for electric power systems and equipment–voltage ratings (60 Hertz)’, 2006.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Hydro Ottawa Annual Planning Report: ‘2014 system capacity plan’. Available at

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address