access icon free Neural network model predictive control optimisation for large wind turbines

Energy poverty limits the economy and social development throughout the world. Wind turbine reduces the energy costs and facilitates the development of renewable energy industry, which provides an effective solution to energy crisis and environment pollution and develops rapidly in recently years. In this paper, a radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) optimisation model predictive control (MPC) was proposed for large wind turbines. In accordance with the complexity and uncertainty of wind turbine operation, a linear model based on the blade element momentum theory was established and the influencing factors of the proposed model were evaluated. The MPC taking into full account three degrees of freedom control multivariate was enforced by RBFNN prediction model, which meets the requirements of specified operation region. Additionally, the RBFNN prediction model with the memory of complicated rules and changed trend was trained by a great deal of historical data. The RBFNN in combination with MPC solves global optimisation problems and improves the dynamic performance of system. Simulation results for three-bladed 5 MW onshore wind turbine verified the effectiveness of the proposed method and confirmed the fact that the fatigue loads were significantly reduced in the turbine tower.

Inspec keywords: power generation control; predictive control; optimisation; wind turbines; neurocontrollers; uncertain systems

Other keywords: three-bladed onshore wind turbine; uncertainty; dynamic performance; blade element momentum theory; energy poverty; global optimisation problems; radial basis function neural network; MPC; degrees of freedom; RBFNN; renewable energy industry; power 5 MW; neural network model predictive control optimisation

Subjects: Neurocontrol; Control of electric power systems; Other topics in statistics; Other topics in statistics; Optimisation techniques; Optimisation techniques; Optimal control; Wind power plants

References

    1. 1)
      • 18. Konstantinos, D., Kimon, P.V., Piegl, L.A.: ‘Nonlinear model predictive control with neural network optimization for autonomous autorotation of small unmanned helicopters’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2011, 19, (4), pp. 818831.
    2. 2)
      • 10. Dunne, F., Simley, E., Pao, L.: ‘LIDAR Wind speed measurement analysis and feed-forward blade pitch control for load mitigation in wind turbines’, (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, October 2011), pp. 2638.
    3. 3)
      • 27. Gil, P., Henriques, J., Cardoso, A., et al: ‘Affine neural network-based predictive control applied to a distributed solar collector field’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2014, 22, (2), pp. 585596.
    4. 4)
      • 1. Zhang, Y., Eduard, M., Dmitry, K., et al: ‘Wind power plant model validation using synchrophasor measurements at the point of interconnection’, IEEE Trans. Sust. Energy, 2015, 6, (3), pp. 984992.
    5. 5)
      • 2. Mona, M.-A., Grigoriadis, K.M.: ‘Anti-windup linear parameter-varying control of pitch actuators in wind turbines’, Wind Energy, 2015, 18, pp. 187200.
    6. 6)
      • 11. Yao, W., Chen, X., Zhao, Y., et al: ‘Concurrent subspace width optimization method for RBF neural network modeling’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2012, 23, (2), pp. 247259.
    7. 7)
      • 21. Kragh, K.A., Hansen, M.H.: ‘Sensor comparison study for load alleviating wind turbine pitch control’, Wind Energy, 2014, 17, pp. 18911904.
    8. 8)
      • 16. Hesham, G.M., Ghaleb, A., Husseini Nabil, A.J., et al: ‘Use of model predictive control and artificial neural networks to optimize the ultrasonic release of a model drug from liposomes’, IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci., 2017, 16, pp. 149156.
    9. 9)
      • 20. Roohollah, F., Gerry, M., Mehrdad, M.: ‘The impact of tower shadow, yaw error, and wind shears on power quality in a wind–diesel system’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2009, 24, (1), pp. 102110.
    10. 10)
      • 7. Sachin, T.N., Edwin, S., Jan, W., et al: ‘Wind tunnel testing of subspace predictive repetitive control for variable pitch wind turbines’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2015, 27, pp. 367379.
    11. 11)
      • 9. Mostafa, S., Malik, O.P., Westwick, D.T.: ‘Multiple model predictive control for wind turbines with doubly fed induction generators’, IEEE Trans. Sust. Energy, 2011, 2, (3), pp. 215225.
    12. 12)
      • 5. Jiang, H., Lin, J., Song, Y.: ‘Demand side frequency control scheme in an isolated wind power system for industrial aluminum smelting production’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (2), pp. 844853.
    13. 13)
      • 6. Fernando, A.I., Fernando, D.B., Herńan De, B., et al: ‘LPV wind turbine control with anti-windup features covering the complete wind speed range’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers, 2014, 29, (1), pp. 259266.
    14. 14)
      • 28. Rychlik, I.: ‘A new definition of the rainflow cycle counting method’, Int. J. Fatigue, 1987, 9, (2), pp. 119121.
    15. 15)
      • 3. Han, B., Zhou, L., Yang, F., et al: ‘Individual pitch controller based on fuzzy logic control for wind turbine load mitigation’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (5), pp. 687693.
    16. 16)
      • 25. Xiaofang, Y., Yaonan, W., Wei, S., et al: ‘RBF networks-based adaptive inverse model control system for electronic throttle’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2010, 18, pp. 750756.
    17. 17)
      • 22. Matthew, A.L.: ‘An investigation of variable power collective pitch control for load mitigation of floating offshore wind turbines’, Wind Energy, 2013, 16, pp. 519528.
    18. 18)
      • 29. Sutherland, H.J.: ‘On the fatigue analysis of wind turbines’ (Sandia National Laboratories, 1999), pp. 1039.
    19. 19)
      • 24. Yan, Z., Wang, J.: ‘Nonlinear model predictive control based on collective neurodynamic optimization’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2015, 46, (4), pp. 840850.
    20. 20)
      • 19. Dolan, S.L.D., Lehn, P.W.: ‘simulation model of wind turbine 3p torque oscillations due to wind shear and tower shadow’, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2006, 21, (3), pp. 20502057.
    21. 21)
      • 15. Kittisupakorn, P., Thitiyasook, P., Hussain, M.A., et al: ‘Neural network based model predictive control for a steel pickling process’, J. Process Control, 2009, 19, (4), pp. 579590.
    22. 22)
      • 14. Wang, T., Gao, H., Qiu, J.: ‘A combined adaptive neural network and nonlinear model predictive control for multirate networked industrial process control’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2016, 27, (2), pp. 416425.
    23. 23)
      • 4. Wu, Y.-K, Lee, C.-Y, Chen, C.-R., et al: ‘Optimization of the wind turbine layout and transmission system planning for a large-scale offshore wind farm by AI technology’, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2014, 50, pp. 20712080.
    24. 24)
      • 12. Jain, T., Singh, S.N., Srivastava, S.C.: ‘Adaptive wavelet neural network-based fast dynamic available transfer capability determination’, IET. Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2010, 4, (4), pp. 519529.
    25. 25)
      • 26. Wang, Z, Wang, J., Chen, B., et al: ‘MPC-Based voltage/var optimization for distribution circuits with distributed generators and exponential load models’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2014, 5, (5), pp. 24122420.
    26. 26)
      • 13. Zou, Y., Zheng, Z.: ‘A robust adaptive RBFNN augmenting backstepping control approach for a model-scaled helicopter’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2015, 23, (6), pp. 23442352.
    27. 27)
      • 17. Bing, H., Lawu, Z., Hao, C., et al: ‘Approach to model predictive control of large wind turbine using light detection and ranging measurements’, Proc. CSEE, 2016, 36, (18), pp. 50625069.
    28. 28)
      • 8. Hassan, H.M., Eishafei, A.L., Farag, W.A., et al: ‘A robust LMI-based pitch controller for large wind turbines’, Renew. Energy, 2012, 44, pp. 6371.
    29. 29)
      • 23. Henriksen, L.C, Hansen, M.H., Poulsen, N.K.: ‘Wind turbine control with constraint handling: a model predictive control approach’, IET Control Theory Appl., 2012, 6, (11), pp. 17221734.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1989
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1989
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading