Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Multi-contingency TSCOPF based on full-system simulation

Transient stability constrained optimal power flow (TSCOPF) is a non-linear optimisation problem used to perform economic dispatches while ensuring TS. This study proposes a multi-contingency TSCOPF model that retains the dynamics of all generators and includes a transient synchronous generator fourth-order dq-axis model. A program is developed that automatically reads the system data from standard files, builds the multiple-contingency TSCOPF model on a high-level modelling system and solves it using a non-heuristic interior point algorithm. This approach facilitates the application of the model to a variety of systems and scenarios. A TSC based on the speed deviation instead of the rotor angle is proposed. Results obtained on several standard systems are shown. The proposed method is applied to the northwest Spanish transmission system to obtain an optimised dispatch that ensures TS after any of a number of faults, and to assess the economic impact of fault-clearing times at different substations.

References

    1. 1)
      • 22. Layden, D., Jeyasurya, B.: ‘Integrating security constraints in optimal power flow studies’. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 125129.
    2. 2)
      • 17. ‘A novel margin sensitivity based method for transient stability constrained optimal power flow’. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378779613002940, accessed: 23 May 2016.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 25. ‘IEEE guide for synchronous generator modeling practices and applications in power system stability analyses’. IEEE Std. 1110-2002 Revis. IEEE Std. 1110-1991, 2003, p. 0_1-72.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 38. Wächter, A.: ‘An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear optimization with applications in process engineering’, PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2002.
    10. 10)
      • 31. ‘GAMS Home Page’. Available at https://www.gams.com/, accessed: 05 June 2016.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 42. UCTE Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Energy: ‘Final Report – System Disturbance on 4 November 2006’. 2007.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 40. ‘Power flow cases – Illinois Center for a Smarter Electric Grid (ICSEG)’..
    17. 17)
      • 39. ‘IEEE 118 bus test case data’. Available at http://www.motor.ece.iit.edu/data/JEAS_IEEE118.doc, accessed: 23 May 2016.
    18. 18)
      • 35. Anderson, P.M., Fouad, A.A.: ‘Power system control and stability’ (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2002, 2nd edn.).
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • 37. ‘IPOPT’ Availableat https://www.projects.coin-or.org/Ipopt, accessed: 23 May 2016.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 2. Moyano, C.F., Castronuovo, E.: ‘Non-linear mathematical programming applied to electric power systems stability’, in: ‘Optimization advances in electric power systems’ (Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2009).
    27. 27)
      • 33. Zhu, J.: ‘Optimization of power system operation’ (John Wiley & Sons, 2009).
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 36. Siemens TI, Ed.: ‘BOSL controllers – standard 1’. 2008.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 32. Grainger, J.J., Stevenson, W.D.Jr.: ‘Power system analysis’ (McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, New York, 1994, 1st edn.).
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
      • 1. Xu, Y., Dong, Z.Y., Xu, Z., et al: ‘Power system transient stability-constrained optimal power flow: a comprehensive review’. 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2012, pp. 17.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
      • 34. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and control’ (McGraw-Hill Professional, 1994).
    38. 38)
      • 41. ‘TEST SYSTEM REPORT development of a comprehensive power system simulation laboratory’. Available at http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/pssl/drupal7_with_innTheme/?q=node/374, accessed: 23 May 2016.
    39. 39)
    40. 40)
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0355
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0355
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address