© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
The increasing penetration of wind power makes it a critical problem to maintain the security and economy in power system operations. This study proposes a security constrained economic dispatch (SCED) strategy that considers optimising system state selection and spinning reserve allocation. The system state selection is judged by the criterion of occurrence probability. Considering the impacts of wind power integration on the outage probability of system component, the over-current protection outage model and voltage protection outage model are employed to calculate the operational outage probabilities of transmission lines and generators, respectively. The fast sorting technique is adopted to select all system states with higher-occurrence probability than the system security threshold. Besides the traditional constraints on system demand and regulation range, the spinning reserve allocation additionally obeys the transmission constraints in the selected states to avoid transmission congestion in contingency situations. Benders decomposition is utilised to partition the SCED problem into the active power dispatch sub-problem and the optimal reserve allocation sub-problem for tractability. A numerical comparison with the traditional N−1 security assessment SCED is given to validate security and economic improvement of the proposed method.
References
-
-
1)
-
18. Vrakopoulou, M., Margellos, K., Lygeros, J., et al: ‘A probabilistic framework for reserve scheduling and N−1 security assessment of systems with high wind power penetration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 3885–3895 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2272546).
-
2)
-
7. Hu, B., Wu, L., Marwali, M.: ‘On the robust solution to SCUC with load and wind uncertainty correlations’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (6), pp. 2952–2964 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2308637).
-
3)
-
27. Wei, Z., Hui, S., Yu, P.: ‘Risk reserve constrained economic dispatch model with wind power penetration’, Energies, 2010, 3, pp. 1880–1894 (doi: 10.3390/en3121880).
-
4)
-
21. Ding, Y., Singh, C., Goel, L., et al: ‘Short-term and medium-term reliability evaluation for power systems with high penetration of wind power’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 5, (3), pp. 896–906 (doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2014.2313017).
-
5)
-
12. Cheng, W., Zhang, H.: ‘A dynamic economic dispatch model incorporating wind power based on chance constrained programming’, Energies, 2015, 8, pp. 233–256 (doi: 10.3390/en8010233).
-
6)
-
26. Jaleeli, N., VanSlyck, L.S.: ‘NERC's new control performance standards’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1999, 14, (3), pp. 1092–1099 (doi: 10.1109/59.780932).
-
7)
-
8. Kalantari, A., Restrepo, J.F., Galiana, F.D.: ‘Security-constrained unit commitment with uncertain wind generation: the loadability set approach’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 1787–1796 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2230029).
-
8)
-
25. Alguacil, N., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Multiperiod optimal power flow using benders decomposition’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst, 2000, 15, (4), pp. 196–201 (doi: 10.1109/59.852121).
-
9)
-
11. Li, Z., Wu, W., Zhang, B., et al: ‘Adjustable robust real-time power dispatch with large-scale wind power integration’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (2), pp. 357–368 (doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2014.2377752).
-
10)
-
30. Fabbri, A., Roman, T.G.S., Abbad, J.R., et al: ‘Assessment of the cost associated with wind generation prediction errors in a liberalized electricity market’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (3), pp. 1440–1446 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.852148).
-
11)
-
23. Sun, Y., Cheng, L., He, J.: ‘Operational reliability models of power system components’, in Zhang, Z. (Ed.): ‘Power system operational reliability theory’ (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2012, 1st edn.), pp. 52–59.
-
12)
-
10. Ding, T., Sun, H., Harley, F., et al: ‘Bi-level linear programming based in interval optimization for SCED in presence of wind power uncertainty’. 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, July 2014, pp. 1–5.
-
13)
-
14. Brown, N.A., Ajjarapu, V., Navid, N.: ‘Economic dispatch with deliverable ramping capability constraint for high wind penetration’. 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, July 2014, pp. 1–5.
-
14)
-
29. Shahidehpour, M., Wang, Y.: ‘Appendix C: IEEE 30 bus system data’, in Faduska, C. (Ed.): ‘Communication and control in electric power systems: applications of parallel and distributed processing’ (Wiley-IEEE Press, , 2003, 1st edn.), pp. 493–495.
-
15)
-
3. Li, Z., Wu, W., Zhang, B., et al: ‘Robust look-ahead power dispatch with adjustable conservativeness accommodating significant wind power integration’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (3), pp. 1–10 (doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2439936).
-
16)
-
5. Cardell, J.B., Anderson, C.L.: ‘A flexible dispatch margin for wind integration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 30, (3), pp. 1–10.
-
17)
-
9. Mishra, S., Mishra, Y., Vignesh, S.: ‘Security constrained economic dispatch considering wind energy conversion systems’. 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, July 2011, pp. 1–8.
-
18)
-
39. Binato, S., Pereira, M.V.F., Granville, S.: ‘A new Benders decomposition approach to solve power transmission network design problems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2001, 16, (2), pp. 235–240 (doi: 10.1109/59.918292).
-
19)
-
19. Vrakopoulou, M., Margellos, K., Lygeros, J., et al: ‘A probabilistic framework for reserve scheduling of networks with wind power generation’. 2012 IEEE Int. Energy Conf. and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, September 2012, pp. 452–457.
-
20)
-
20. Liu, H., Sun, Y., Cheng, L.: ‘Fast sorting technique considering multi-state component models’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2008, 32, (1), pp. 16–21.
-
21)
-
22)
-
15. Gribik, P.R., Chatterjee, D., Navid, N.: ‘Potential new products and models to improve an RTO's ability to manage uncertainty’. 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, July 2012, pp. 1–5.
-
23)
-
11. Ding, T., Huang, C., Bo, R., et al: ‘Interval arithmetic based optimal curtailment for infeasible SCED considering wind power uncertainties’. 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, July 2015, pp. 1–5.
-
24)
-
23. Thapa, S., Karki, R., Billinton, R.: ‘Utilization of the area risk concept for operational reliability evaluation of a wind-integrated power system’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, pp. 4771–4779 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2264904).
-
25)
-
16. Chen, J., Wu, W., Zhang, B., et al: ‘A spinning reserve allocation method for power generation dispatch accommodating large-scale wind power integration’, Energies, 2013, 6, pp. 5357–5381 (doi: 10.3390/en6105357).
-
26)
-
1. Yang, S., Tong, X., Zhang, H.: ‘Study on power dynamic transfer characteristics of wind power generation system’. 2014 Int. Electronics and Application Conf. and Exposition, Shanghai, China, November 2014, pp. 157–161.
-
27)
-
13. Navid, N., Rosenwald, G.: ‘Market solutions for managing ramp flexibility with high penetration of renewable resource’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2012, 3, (4), pp. 784–790 (doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2012.2203615).
-
28)
-
5. Bludszuweit, H., Domínguez-Navarro, J.A., Llombart, A.: ‘Statistical analysis of wind power forecast error’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2008, 23, (3), pp. 983–991 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922526).
-
29)
-
27. Wang, C., Lu, Z., Qiao, Y.: ‘A consideration of the wind power benefits in day-ahead scheduling of wind-coal intensive power systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (1), pp. 236–245 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2205280).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0297
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0297
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6