Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Efficient approach to quantify commutation failure immunity levels in multi-infeed HVDC systems

Commutation failure immunity index (CFII) is a useful indicator to quantify the immunity level to commutation failures in line commutated converter-based multi-infeed HVDC systems. Instead of using simulation tools which inevitably lead to heavy workload and long computation time, the analytical expressions of ‘local CFII’ (LCFII) and ‘concurrent CFII’ (CCFII) are derived based on the minimum extinction angle criteria. Using these expressions, the impact of the system parameters on commutation failure immunity levels in the inverter side can be determined quickly and effectively. Moreover, the derived analytical expressions will make the parametric sensitivity analysis more comprehensive and complete compared to the traditional simulation-based methods. Furthermore, in order to give an insight into how inter-inverter interactions influence the concurrent commutation failure behaviours, an improved index ‘weak coupling multi-infeed interaction factor’ (WCMIIF) is proposed. The validity and accuracy of the proposed index and analytical expressions are verified by the simulated results based on a dual-infeed HVDC system in PSCAD/EMTDC, which indicate that LCFII has an approximately linear correlation with the local effective short-circuit ratio (ESCR) of the faulted ac system, and that with the WCMIIF unchanged, CCFII has an approximately linear correlation with the local ESCR and an inverse correlation with the multi-infeed interaction factor.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Arrillaga, J.: ‘High voltage direct current transmission’ (Inst. Elect. Eng. Publ., London, 1998).
    2. 2)
      • 13. Rahimi, E.: ‘Voltage interactions and commutation failure phenomena in multi-infeed HVDC systems’. PhD thesis, University of Manitoba, 2011.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 20. CIGRE Working Group B4.41: ‘Systems with multiple DC infeed’, 2008, pp. 1617.
    5. 5)
      • 3. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and control, in EPRI power system engineering series’ (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 8. Nayak, R.N., Sasmal, R.P., Sehgal, Y.K., et al: ‘AC/DC interactions in multi-infeed HVDC scheme: a case study’. IEEE Power Conf., India, 2006, p. 5.
    8. 8)
      • 7. Zhou, C., Xu, Z.: ‘Study on commutation failure of multi-infeed HVDC system’. Proc. IEEE Power System Technology Conf., Kunming, China, 2002, pp. 24622466.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 10. He, Z., Li, X.: ‘Study on mutual admittance and commutation failure for multi-infeed HVDC transmission systems’, Proc. CSEE, 2008, 28, (7), pp. 5157.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 9. Rahimi, E., Gole, A.M., Davies, J.B., et al: ‘Commutation failure in single- and multi-infeed HVDC systems’. Proc. 8th Institute of Electrical Engineers Int. Conf. AC-DC Power Transmission, London, U.K., 2006, pp. 182186.
    15. 15)
      • 14. Szechtman, M., Wess, T., Thio, C.V.: ‘First benchmark model for HVDC control studies’, Electra, 1991, (135), pp. 5473.
    16. 16)
      • 19. IEEE Standard C1204-1997: ‘IEEE guide for planning DC links terminating at AC locations having low short-circuit capacities’, 1997.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 12. Shao, Y., Tang, Y.: ‘A commutation failure detection method for HVDC systems based on multi-infeed interaction factors’, Proc. CSEE, 2012, 32, (04), pp. 108114.
    19. 19)
      • 18. Meisingset, M., Gole, A.M.: ‘A comparison of conventional and capacitor commutated converters based on steady-state and dynamic considerations’. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. AC-DC Power Transmission, 2001, pp. 4954.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0800
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0800
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address