© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
This study presents a mixed-integer second-order conic programming (MISOCP) model for the robust reconfiguration of electrical distribution systems, considering the minimisation of active power losses and reliability constraints. The uncertainty at the reliability data is considered by using a linear and adjustable robust approach. The indices used to evaluate the reliability of the system are the system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) and the system average interruption duration index (SAIDI), both of which are calculated as functions of the switch status (open or closed). Under radiality constraints, the solution generated by the proposed model is robust in terms of the reliability, i.e. the SADI and SAIFI limits imposed by regulators are not violated even if the uncertain data changes stochastically. The use of an MISOCP model guarantees convergence to optimality by using existing convex optimisation solvers. To evaluate the robustness of each solution generated by the proposed model, a set of Monte Carlo simulations were deployed. Finally, all tests were executed in a 136-node real distribution system.
References
-
-
1)
-
18. Carcamo-Gallardo, A., Garcia-Santander, L., Pezoa, J.: ‘Greedy reconfiguration algorithms for medium-voltage distribution networks’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2009, 24, (1), pp. 328–337, (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2008.923997).
-
2)
-
3)
-
4)
-
27. Romero-Ramos, E., Riquelme-Santos, J., Reyes, J.: ‘A simpler and exact mathematical model for the computation of the minimal power losses tree’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2010, 80, (5), pp. 562–571, (doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2009.10.016).
-
5)
-
3. Billinton, R., Allan, R.N.: ‘Reliability evaluation of power systems’ (Springer, New York, 1996, 2nd edn.), .
-
6)
-
8. Kavousi-Fard, A., Niknam, T.: ‘Multi-objective stochastic distribution feeder reconfiguration from the reliability point of view’, Energy, 2014, 64, pp. 342–354 (doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.060).
-
7)
-
23. Cespedes, R.: ‘New method for the analysis of distribution networks’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1990, 5, (1), pp. 391–396, (doi: 10.1109/61.107303).
-
8)
-
14. Esmaeilian, H.R., Fadaeinedjad, R., Attari, S.M.: ‘Distribution network reconfiguration to reduce losses and enhance reliability using binary gravitational search algorithm’. Proc. of the 22nd Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, Stockholm, 2013, pp. 1–4.
-
9)
-
4. Merlin, A., Back, H.: ‘Search for a minimal-loss operation spanning tree configuration in an urban power distribution system’. Proc. V Power Systems Computer Conf., Cambridge, UK, 1975, pp. 1–18.
-
10)
-
5. Tang, L., Yang, F., Ma, J.: ‘A survey on distribution system feeder reconfiguration: Objectives and solutions’. Proc. Innovative 2014 Smart Grid Technologies – Asia, Kuala Lumpur, 2014, pp. 62–67.
-
11)
-
17. Vitorino, R.M., Jorgeb, H.M., Neves, L.P.: ‘Loss and reliability optimization for power distribution system operation’, Elect. Power Syst. Res, 2013, 96, pp. 177–184, (doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2012.11.002).
-
12)
-
6. Hsiao, Y.-T.: ‘Multiobjective evolution programming method for feeder reconfiguration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (1), pp. 594–599, (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821430).
-
13)
-
20. Narimani, M.R., Vahed, A.A., Azizipanah-Abarghooee, R., et al: ‘Enhanced gravitational search algorithm for multi-objective distribution feeder reconfiguration considering reliability, loss and operational cost’, IET Gener., Transm. Distrib., 2014, 8, (1), pp. 55–69 (doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0117).
-
14)
-
8. Bernardon, D.P., Garcia, V.J., Ferreira, A.S.Q., et al: ‘Multicriteria distribution network reconfiguration considering subtransmission analysis’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2010, 25, (4), pp. 2684–2691, (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2041013).
-
15)
-
28. Borges, M.C.O., Franco, J.F., Rider, M.J.: ‘Optimal reconfiguration of electrical distribution systems using mathematical programming’, J. Control Autom. Electric. Syst., 2014, 25, (1), pp. 103–111 (doi: 10.1007/s40313-013-0070-x).
-
16)
-
17)
-
14. Shirmohammadi, D., Hong, H.W., Semlyen, A., et al: ‘A compensation-based power flow method for weakly meshed distribution and transmission networks’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1988, 3, (2), pp. 753–762 (doi: 10.1109/59.192932).
-
18)
-
26. Romero-Ramos, E., Riquelme-Santos, J.: ‘Discussion on ‘imposing radiality constraints in distribution system optimization problems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (1), pp. 568–568, (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2236474).
-
19)
-
27. Dimitris, B., Sim, M.: ‘The price of robustness’, Oper. Res., 2004, 52, (1), pp. 35–53 (doi: 10.1287/opre.1030.0065).
-
20)
-
21)
-
13. Gupta, N., Swarnkar, A., Niazi, K.R.: ‘Distribution network reconfiguration for power quality and reliability improvement using genetic algorithms’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2014, 54, pp. 664–671 (doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.08.016).
-
22)
-
21. Kavousi-Fard, A., Akbari-Zadeh, M.-R.: ‘Reliability enhancement using optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration’, Neurocomputing, 2013, 106, pp. 1–11, (doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.08.033).
-
23)
-
30. Bazaraa, M.S., Jarvis, J.J., Sherali, H.D.: ‘Linear programming and network flows’ (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2009, 4th edn.), .
-
24)
-
17. Mendoza, J.E., López1, M.E., Coello Coello, C.A., et al: ‘Microgenetic multiobjective reconfiguration algorithm considering power losses and reliability indices for medium voltage distribution network’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2009, 3, (9), pp. 825–840 (doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0009).
-
25)
-
21. Fourer, R., Gay, D.M., Kernighan, B.W.: ‘AMPL: a modeling language for mathematical programming’ (Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA, 2003, 2nd edn.), .
-
26)
-
21. Lavorato, M., Franco, J.F., Rider, M.J., et al: ‘Imposing radiality constraints in distribution system optimization problems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, pp. 172–180 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2161349).
-
27)
-
29. Franco, J.F., Rider, M.J., Romero, R.: ‘A mixed-integer quadratically-constrained programming model for the distribution system expansion planning’, Int. J. Electric. Power Energy Syst., 2014, 62, pp. 265–272, (doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.04.048).
-
28)
-
16. Amanulla, B., Chakrabarti, S., Sing, S.N.: ‘Reconfiguration of power distribution systems considering reliability and power loss’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2012, 27, (2), pp. 918–926, (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2179950).
-
29)
-
20. Kavousi-Fard, A., Niknam, T.: ‘Optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration for reliability improvement considering uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2014, 29, (3), pp. 1344–1353 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2292951).
-
30)
-
12. Duan, D.-L., Ling, X.-D., Wu, X.-Y., et al: ‘Reconfiguration of distribution network for loss reduction and reliability improvement based on an enhanced genetic algorithm’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2015, 64, pp. 88–95 (doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.036).
-
31)
-
32)
-
22. Alonso, F.R., Oliveira, D.Q., Zambroni de Souza, A.C.: ‘Artificial immune systems optimization approach for multiobjective distribution system reconfiguration’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 30, (2), pp. 840–847, (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2330628).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0558
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0558
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6