access icon free Utilising stored wind energy by hydro-pumped storage to provide frequency support at high levels of wind energy penetration

Wind farms (WFs) contribution in frequency deviations curtailment is a grey area, especially when WFs replace large conventional generation capacities. This study offers an algorithm to integrate hydro-pumped storage station (HPSS) to provide inertial and primary support, during frequency drops by utilising stored wind energy. However, wind turbines follow maximum power tracking, and do not apply frequency support methods, thus the wasted wind energy is mitigated. First, HPSS rated power and energy capacity are determined based on several givens, including wind speed and load characteristics. Thus, HPSS major aspects are estimated [e.g. pump(s), reservoir layout and generator(s)]. Second, offered algorithm coordinates energy storage, and releasing through several dynamic and static factors. HPSS output is continuously controlled through a timed approach to provide frequency support. A hypothetical system is inspired from Egyptian grid and real wind speed records at recommended locations to host WFs. Case studies examine the algorithm impact on frequency recovery, at 40% wind power penetration. The responses of thermal generation and HPSS are analysed to highlight the influence of tuning the parameters of the proposed algorithm. The assessment of several frequency metrics insures the positive role of HPSS in frequency drops curtailment. Simulation environments are MATLAB and Simulink.

Inspec keywords: wind power; pumped-storage power stations; wind power plants; energy storage; maximum power point trackers; wind turbines

Other keywords: wind turbine; power capacity; frequency deviation curtailment; thermal generation; wind farms; hydropumped storage station; load characteristics; wind speed; frequency drop curtailment; wind energy penetration; reservoir layout; parameter tuning; Simulink; Egyptian grid; frequency metrics assessment; frequency recovery; Matlab; energy capacity; HPSS; maximum power tracking; stored wind energy utilisation

Subjects: Wind power plants; DC-DC power convertors; Energy resources; Pumped storage stations and plants

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 9. Martinez, J.A.: ‘Modeling and characterization of energy storage devices’. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2011.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 25. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and control’ (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1994).
    5. 5)
      • 21. Chaurette, J.: ‘Pump system analysis and sizing’ (Fluide Design Inc., 2002).
    6. 6)
      • 20. Mortensen, N.G., Said, U.S.: ‘Wind atlas for egypt’, 2009.
    7. 7)
      • 3. Fox, B., Bryans, L., Flynn, D., Jenckins, N., Milborrow, D.: ‘Wind Power Integration: Connection and System Operational Aspects’ (IET Power and Energy Series, 50) (2007).
    8. 8)
      • 30. Andersson, G.: ‘Lecture notes: dynamics and control of eletrical power systems’ (ETH Zurich, Zurich, 2011).
    9. 9)
      • 28. Emam Shalan, H., Moustafa Hassan, M.A., Bahgat, A.B.G.: ‘Parameter estimation and dynamic simulation of gas turbine model in combined cycle power plants based on actual operational data’, J. Am. Sci., 2011, 7, (5), pp. 303310.
    10. 10)
      • 4. Meng, Z.J.: ‘An improved equivalent wind method for the aggregation of DFIG wind turbines’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Power System Technology (POWERCON), China, 2010.
    11. 11)
      • 23. Voith company: ‘Pumps tailormade solutions for water applications’, Available at http://www.voith.com/de/12_06_Pumpenbroschuere.pdf.
    12. 12)
      • 14. Attya, A.B., Ali, H., Hartkopf, T.: ‘Frequency drops mitigation at high wind energy penetration by hydro-pumped storage – capacity sizing’. IEEE 17th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conf., Beirut, 2014.
    13. 13)
      • 27. UCTE: ‘Appendix 1 – load-frequency control and performance’ (The Union of the coordination of the transmission of electricity, 2002).
    14. 14)
      • 5. Rawn, B.G., Gibescu, M., Kling, W.L.: ‘Kinetic energy from distributed wind farms: technical potential and implications’. IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conf. Europe, 2010.
    15. 15)
      • 24. Bergen, A.R., Vittal, V.: ‘Power system analysis’ (Prentice-Hall, 2000, 2nd edn.).
    16. 16)
      • 2. Ackermann, T.: ‘Wind power in power systems’ (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2005).
    17. 17)
      • 26. Kamwa, I., Lefebvre, D., Loud, L.: ‘Small signal analysis of hydro-turbine governors in large interconnected power plants’. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Varennes, Canada, 2002.
    18. 18)
      • 17. Gevorgian, V., Zhang, Y., Ela, E.: ‘Investigating the impacts of wind generation participation in interconnection frequency response’, IEEE Trans. Sust. Energy, 2014, PP, (99), pp. 1–9.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 18. Miller, N., Price, W., Sanchez-Gasca, J.: ‘Dynamic modeling of GE 1.5 and 3.6 MW wind turbine generators’. Technical report, GE company, 2003.
    21. 21)
      • 29. IEEE report: ‘Dynamic models for steam and hydro turbines in power system studies’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1973, 92, (6), pp. 19041915.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 22. Avellan, F.: ‘Storage pumps and reversible pump turbines scientific and technical challenges’. (Renewables grid initiative, Montreaux, 2011).
    27. 27)
      • 11. Iwabuchil, K., Takagi, Y., Konnai, T., et al: ‘Advanced governor controller for pumped-storage power plant and its simulation tool’. SICE-ICASE Int. Joint Conf., Busan, Korea, 2006.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 19. Gameza company: ‘Brochure of wind turbine: G-90-2.0 MW’, 2011.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 15. Egyptian Ministry of Electricity and energy: ‘Annual energy and power generation report’, 2010.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0744
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0744
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading