© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
In this study, a substantial idea has been reviewed which is useful in the investigation of the planning uncertainties. The concept relies on the optimality of an expansion plan in different conditions rather than the condition it has been optimised for. The method is developed in a manner that can be used in all sub-systems (i.e. generation, transmission and distribution) expansion planning. However, in this study the idea has been assessed for generation expansion planning (GEP). Cost and reliability have been considered as two major objectives of the planning and robustness has been added as a supplementary objective. The method can deal with uncertainty in both coefficients of the objective functions and the constraints. Two GEP models, one static and the other dynamic, have been proposed to examine the performance of the method in the uncertainty handling. In addition, the efficiency of the Taguchi's orthogonal array testing method has been compared with Monte Carlo simulation in the scenario generation. Two case studies have been provided to simplify the justification on the efficiency of the method.
References
-
-
1)
-
H. Teixeira Firmo ,
L.F. LoureiroLegey
.
Generation expansion planning: an iterative genetic algorithm approach.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
3 ,
901 -
906
-
2)
-
S. Kannan ,
S.M.R. Slochanal ,
N.P. Padhy
.
Application and comparison of metaheuristic techniques to generation expansion planning problem.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
1 ,
466 -
475
-
3)
-
9. Marin, A., Salmeron, J.: ‘Electric capacity expansion under uncertain demand: decomposition approaches’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1998, 13, (2), pp. 333–339 (doi: 10.1109/59.667347).
-
4)
-
1. Booth, R.R.: ‘Optimal generation planning considering uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1972, PAS-91, (1), pp. 70–77 (doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1972.293292).
-
5)
-
18. Dehghan, S., Amjady, N., Kazemi, A.: ‘Two-stage robust generation expansion planning: a mixed integer linear programming model’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, .
-
6)
-
A.S. Chuang ,
F. Wu ,
P. Varaiya
.
A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: problem formulation and numerical comparisons.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
4 ,
885 -
891
-
7)
-
S. Kannan ,
S. Baskar ,
J.D. McCalley ,
P. Murugan
.
Application of NSGA-II algorithm to generation expansion planning.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
1 ,
454 -
461
-
8)
-
16. Wang, J., Shahidehpour, M., Li, Z., Botterud, A.: ‘Strategic generation capacity expansion planning with incomplete information’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (2), pp. 1002–1010 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2017435).
-
9)
-
9. Yu, H., Chung, C.Y., Wong, K.P.: ‘Robust transmission network expansion planning method with taguchi's orthogonal array testing’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 1573–1580 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2082576).
-
10)
-
19. Mejia-Giraldo, D., McCalley, J.D.: ‘Maximizing future flexibility in electric generation portfolios’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (1), pp. 279–288 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2280840).
-
11)
-
J. Sirikum ,
A. Techanitisawad ,
V. Kachitvichyanukul
.
A new efficient GA-benders' decomposition method: for power generation expansion planning with emission controls.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
3 ,
1092 -
1100
-
12)
-
5. Youn, L.T.O., Lee, K.Y., Park, Y.M.: ‘Optimal long-range generation expansion planning for hydro-thermal system based on analytical production costing model’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1987, 2, (2), pp. 278–284 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.1987.4335119).
-
13)
-
15. Kaymaz, P., Valenzuela, J., Park, C.S.: ‘Transmission congestion and competition on power generation expansion’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (1), pp. 156–163 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.887960).
-
14)
-
21. Hemmati, R., Hooshmand, R.-A., Khodabakhshian, A.: ‘Comprehensive review of generation and transmission expansion planning’, IET G.T.D., 2013, 7, (9), pp. 955–964 (doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0031).
-
15)
-
6. Farghal, S.A., Kandil, M.S., Abdel-Aziz, M.R.: ‘Generation expansion planning: an expert system approach’, IEE Proc. G.T.D., 1988, 135, (4), pp. 261–267.
-
16)
-
7. Mo, B., Hegge, J., Wangensteen, I.: ‘Stochastic generation expansion planning by means of stochastic dynamic programming’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1991, 6, (2), pp. 662–668 (doi: 10.1109/59.76710).
-
17)
-
4. Park, Y.M., Lee, K.Y., Youn, L.T.O.: ‘New analytical approach for long-term generation expansion planning based on maximum principle and Gaussian distribution function’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1985, PAS-104, (2), pp. 390–397 (doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1985.319054).
-
18)
-
28. Peace, G.S.: ‘Taguchi methods: a hand on approach’ (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993).
-
19)
-
13. David, A.K., He, Y.Q., Fernando, P.N.: ‘Private investment in power and deviations from the least cost expansion plan’, IEE Proc. G.T.D., 1995, 142, (3), pp. 269–276 (doi: 10.1049/ip-gtd:19951747).
-
20)
-
B. Alizadeh ,
S. Jadid
.
Reliability constrained coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems using mixed integer programming.
IET Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib.
,
9 ,
948 -
960
-
21)
-
27. Papoulis, A.: ‘Probability & statistics’ (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).
-
22)
-
17. Wogrin, S., Centeno, E., Barquin, J.: ‘Generation capacity expansion in liberalized electricity markets: a stochastic MPEC approach’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (4), pp. 2526–2532 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2138728).
-
23)
-
8. Tanabe, R., Yasuda, K., Yokoyama, R., Sasaki, H.: ‘Flexible generation mix under multi objectives and uncertainties’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1993, 8, (2), pp. 581–587 (doi: 10.1109/59.260824).
-
24)
-
R.N. Allan ,
A.M. Leite da Silva ,
A.A. Abu-Nasser ,
R.C. Burchett
.
Discrete convolution in power system reliability.
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
5 ,
452 -
456
-
25)
-
3. Dapklus, W.D., Bowe, T.R.: ‘Planning of new electric generation technologies a stochastic dynamic programming approach’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1984, PAS-103, (6), pp. 1447–1453 (doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1984.318482).
-
26)
-
20. Mejia-Giraldo, D., McCalley, J.: ‘Adjustable decisions for reducing the price of robustness of capacity expansion planning’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, .
-
27)
-
2. Stremel, J.P.: ‘Generation system planning under load forecast uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1981, PAS-100, (1), pp. 384–393 (doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1981.316867).
-
28)
-
24. Park, Y.M., Park, J.B., Won, J.R.: ‘A hybrid genetic algorithm/dynamic programming approach to optimal long-term generation expansion planning’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 1998, 20, (4), pp. 295–303 (doi: 10.1016/S0142-0615(97)00070-7).
-
29)
-
30. Deb, K.: ‘Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms’ (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2001, pp. 245–253).
-
30)
-
J.B. Park ,
Y.M. Park ,
J.R. Won ,
K.Y. Lee
.
An improved genetic algorithm for generation expansion planning.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
3 ,
916 -
922
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0674
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0674
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6