New approach for sharing wind generation spatial diversification in multi-area power systems using trade-off analysis

New approach for sharing wind generation spatial diversification in multi-area power systems using trade-off analysis

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Wind is one of the fast growing renewable resources that can significantly contribute in achieving emission-free electricity generation system. Since wind resources are distributed across geographical locations, wind resource sharing among different geographical locations is essential to facilitate wind energy penetration and its full utilisation. A wind resource sharing strategy, for interconnected electricity networks, to achieve the national and regional renewable energy target is presented in this study. A multi-objective decision making problem has been formulated to optimally share the installed wind generation capacity in a multi-area power systems. Computational models have been developed for wind generation adequacy, emission reduction from wind energy and capacity upgrade requirements for tie-line interconnections. Trade-off analysis has been used to select the best wind resource sharing options. The proposed wind resource sharing strategy has been applied to the interconnected power systems operated within the National Electricity Market (NEM) framework of Southeast Australia to share the available wind resources within the geographical areas of the participating states in the NEM.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 3. Dvorak, M.J., Stoutenburg, E.D., Archer, C.L., Kempton, K., Jacobson, M.Z.: ‘Where is the ideal location for a US East Coast offshore grid?’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2012, 39, (6), pp. 16.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 8. Cole, S., Karoui, K., Vrana, T.K., et al: ‘A European supergrid: present state and future challenges’. Proc. Power Systems Computation Conf. (PSCC), Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 20. Loutan, C., Hawkins, D.: ‘Integration of renewable resources: operational requirements and generation fleet capability at 20% RPS’. California ISO report, November 2007., accessed June 2013.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Australian Energy Market Operator, ‘Wind integration in electricity grids: International practice and experience’, Wind Integration Investment Work Package 3., accessed June 2013.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 27. Australian Energy Market Operator, ‘Wind Integration in Electricity Grids Work Package 3: Simulation using Historical Wind Data’, Wind Integration Investment Work Package 3., accessed May 2013.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 31. Australian Energy Market Operator, National Transmission Network Development Planning 2012. Online, available at
    32. 32)
      • 32. Department of Resource, Energy and Tourism. ‘Energy white paper 2012: Australia's energy transformation’,, accessed June 2013.
    33. 33)
      • 33. Climate Change Authority, Australian Government, Renewable Energy Target Review 2012, Online, available at

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address