Reliability constrained coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems using mixed integer programming

Author(s): B. Alizadeh and S. Jadid
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0122

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF

Buy Knowledge Pack

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership

Recommend Title Publication to library

IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Author(s): B. Alizadeh ¹ and S. Jadid ¹
- Affiliations: 1: Center of Excellence for Power Systems Automation and Operation, Electrical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Source: Volume 5, Issue 9, September 2011, p. 948 – 960
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0122 , Print ISSN 1751-8687, Online ISSN 1751-8695

This paper presents a new approach on expansion planning problem in power systems. The simultaneous expansion of generation and transmission subsystems has been formulated as a mixed integer programming problem to cover different constraints. The method introduces a static planning method which models the least cost deviation from the initial point (pre-expansion condition) in a manner that matches the peak load requirements of the planning horizon (post-expansion condition). The DC power flow model is used to reflect transmission flow constraint in a framework that automatically eliminates disconnected bus problem. Instead of considering just one candidate design for a corridor, different types of designs have been included in the model. This fact makes the model more practical in the transmission expansion planning section. Environmental constraints and fuel supply limitations have been also included for thermal units. Besides, a heuristic algorithm has been proposed to assure the required amount of reliability at hierarchical level II. The algorithm is based on reinforcing the economically optimal plan to upgrade its reliability level to any desired value. The scheme is capable of suggesting an economical level of reliability for a given system by reflecting cost and worth of reinforcements. To numerically evaluate the efficiency of the proposed method, simulation results on the modified Garver6-bus and IEEE 30-bus systems are provided. In spite of huge computation burden at hierarchical level II (HLII) reliability assessment, the results indicate high efficiency of the proposed method.

References

1. 1)
  - R. Romero , R.A. Gallego , A. Monticelli . Transmission system expansion planning by simulated annealing. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 364 - 369
2. 2)
  - I.J. Silva , M.J. Rider , R. Romero , A.V. Garcia , C.A. Murari . Transmission network expansion planning with security constraints. IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 6 , 828 - 836
3. 3)
  - Y. Fukuyama , H.D. Chiang . A parallel genetic algorithm for generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 955 - 961
4. 4)
  - R.A. Jabr , B.C. Pal . Intermittent wind generation in optimal power flow dispatching. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 1 , 66 - 74
5. 5)
  - M.J. Rider , A.V. Garcia , R. Romero . Transmission network expansion planning by a branch-and-bound algorithm. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 1 , 90 - 99
6. 6)
  - M.J. Rider , A.V. Garcia , R. Romero . Power system transmission network expansion planning using AC model. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 5 , 731 - 742
7. 7)
  - E.L. Silva , H.A. Gil , J.M. Areiza . Transmission network expansion planning under an improved genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 1168 - 1175
8. 8)
  - L. Bahiense , G.C. Oliveira , M. Pereira , S. Granville . A mixed integer disjunctive model for transmission network expansion. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 560 - 565
9. 9)
  - R.A. Gallego , A. Monticelli , R. Romero . Comparative studies on nonconvex optimization methods for transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 822 - 828
10. 10)
  - R. Romero , A. Monticelli . A hierarcical decomposition approach for transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 373 - 380
11. 11)
  - Y.M. Park , J.R. Won , J.B. Park , D.G. Kim . Generation expansion planning based on an advanced evolutionary programming. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 299 - 305
12. 12)
  - R.A. Gallego , A.B. Alves , A. Monticelli , R. Romero . Parallel simulating annealing applied to long term transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 181 - 188
13. 13)
  - R.A. Gallego , A. Monticelli , R. Romero . Transmission system expansion planning by an extended genetic algorithm. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 3 , 329 - 335
14. 14)
  - S. Kannan , S.M.R. Slochanal , S. Baskar , P. Murugan . Application and comparison of metaheuristic techniques to generation expansion planning in the partially deregulated enviroment. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 1 , 111 - 118
15. 15)
  - I.G. Sanchez , R. Romero , J.R.S. Mantovani , M.J. Rider . Transmission-expansion planning using the DC model and nonlinear-programming technique. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 6 , 763 - 769
16. 16)
  - E.L. da Silva , J.M.A. Ortiz , G.C. de Oliveira , S. Binato . Transmission network expansion planning under a tabu search approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 62 - 68
17. 17)
  - S. Kannan , S.M.R. Slochanal , N.P. Padhy . Application and comparison of metaheuristic techniques to generation expansion planning problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 466 - 475
18. 18)
  - H. Teixeira Firmo , L.F. LoureiroLegey . Generation expansion planning: an iterative genetic algorithm approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 901 - 906
19. 19)
  - M.V.F. Pereira , L.M.V.G. Pinto , S.H.F. Cunha , G.C. Oliveira . A decomposition approach to automated generation/transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 11 , 3074 - 3083
20. 20)
  - A. Monticelli , A. Santos , M.V.F. Pereira , S.H. Cunha , B.J. Parker , J.C.G. Praca . Interactive transmission network planning using a least-effort criterion. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 10 , 3919 - 3925
21. 21)
  - M.S. Sepasian , H. Seifi , A.A. Foroud , A.R. Hatami . A multiyear security constrained hybrid generation-transmission expansion planning algorithm including fuel supply costs. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 1609 - 1618
22. 22)
  - L.L. Garver . Transmission net estimation using linear programming. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 1688 - 1697
23. 23)
  - N. Alguacil , A.L. Motto , A.J. Conejo . Transmission expansion planning: a mixed-integer LP approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 1070 - 1077
24. 24)
  - A. Ramos , I.J. Perez-Arriaga , J. Bogas . A nonlinear programming approach to optimal static generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 1140 - 1146
25. 25)
  - S. Kannan , S. Baskar , J.D. McCalley , P. Murugan . Application of NSGA-II algorithm to generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 454 - 461
26. 26)
  - P. Murugan , S. Kannan , S. Baskar . Application of NSGA-II algorithm to single objective transmission constrained generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 4 , 1790 - 1797
27. 27)
  - J.B. Park , Y.M. Park , J.R. Won , K.Y. Lee . An improved genetic algorithm for generation expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 3 , 916 - 922
28. 28)
  - R.A. Gallego , R. Romero , A. Monticelli . Tabu search algorithm for network synthesis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 490 - 495
29. 29)
  - A.H. Escobar , R.A. Gallego , R. Romero . Multistage and coordinated planning of the expansion of transmission systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 735 - 744
30. 30)
  - http://www.GAMS.com, accessed January 2011.
31. 31)
  - L. Wenyuan , R. Billinton . A minimum cost assessment method for composite generation and transmission system expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 628 - 635
32. 32)
  - R.M. Sawey , C.D. Zinn . A mathematical model for long range expansion of generation and transmission in electric utility systems. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 2 , 657 - 666
33. 33)
  - X. Wang , J.R. McDonald . (1994) Modern power system planning.
34. 34)
  - M.V.F. Pereira , L.M.V.G. Pinto . Application of sensitivity analysis of load supplying capability to interactive transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 2 , 381 - 389
35. 35)
  - T. Sum-Im , G.A. Taylor , M.R. Irving , Y.H. Song . Differential evolution algorithm for static and multistage transmission expansion planning. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 4 , 365 - 384
36. 36)
  - R. Billinton , R.N. Allan . (1984) Reliability evaluation of power systems.

Reliability constrained coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems using mixed integer programming

Reliability constrained coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems using mixed integer programming

Buy article PDF

Buy Knowledge Pack

Thank you

References

Related content