Energy evaluation of the power network of a DC railway system with regenerating trains

Energy evaluation of the power network of a DC railway system with regenerating trains

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Electrical Systems in Transportation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Regenerating trains are now in common use on many DC fed railway systems, and train operating companies are able to get a discount on their energy costs if regeneration is active. The electrical energy consumption in a DC system is significant, and a comprehensive understanding of how regeneration affects the overall system energy consumption has not been developed. This study presents a simulation method in which a multi-train analysis is used to determine the system energy consumption with and without regeneration in operation, as well as the impact on the system energy consumption of different headways. The results are used to determine a full ‘energy audit’ of the system based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang subway line. This includes the energy supplied by the substations, the energy wasted in the power transmission network, the energy used by the train in traction and regenerated by braking trains. The initial results show that regenerating trains have a significantly lower substation demand, but slightly more energy is lost within the network. The results also indicate that, the available regenerative energy and total substation demand vary with different timetables, and there is a 27% difference between the best and worst headways.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 16. Goodman, C.J., Siu, L.K.: ‘DC railway power network solutions by diakoptics’. Railroad Conf., 1994, Proc. 1994 ASME/IEEE Joint (in Conjunction with Area 1994 Annual Technical Conf.), 1994, pp. 103110.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Goodman, C.: ‘Modelling and Simulation’. 3rd IET Professional Development Course on Railway Electrification Infrastructure and Systems, 2007, pp. 217230.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
      • 30. Chymera, M., Goodman, C.J.: ‘Overview of electric railway systems and the calculation of train performance’. IET Professional Development Course on Electric Traction Systems (2012), 2012, pp. 118.
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
      • 35. Tian, Z., Hillmansen, S., Roberts, C., et al: ‘Modeling and simulation of DC rail traction systems for energy saving’. IEEE 17th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2014, 2014, pp. 23542359.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address