Mammographic mass classification using filter response patches

Mammographic mass classification using filter response patches

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Considering the importance of early diagnosis of breast cancer, a supervised patch-wise texton-based approach has been developed for the classification of mass abnormalities in mammograms. The proposed method is based on texture-based classification of masses in mammograms and does not require segmentation of the mass region. In this approach, patches from filter bank responses are utilised for generating the texton dictionary. The methodology is evaluated on the publicly available Digital Database for Screening Mammography database. Using a naive Bayes classifier, a classification accuracy of 83% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 was obtained. Experimental results demonstrated that the patch-wise texton-based approach in conjunction with the naive Bayes classifier constructs an efficient and alternative approach for automatic mammographic mass classification.


    1. 1)
      • 1. National Health Service-Breast Screening: ‘Professional guidance’, 31 August 2016. Available at
    2. 2)
      • 2. Tabár, L., Dean, P.B.: ‘Breast cancer-the art and science of early detection with mammography’ (Thieme, New York, 2005), ISBN: 3-13-131.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Djaroudib, K., Ahmed, A.T., Zidani, A.: ‘Textural approach for mass abnormality segmentation in mammographic images’, 2014, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.1506.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Elter, M., Horsch, A.: ‘CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review’, Med. Phys., 2009, 36, (6), pp. 20522068.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Marti, J., et al: ‘A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images’, Med. Image Anal., 2010, 14, (2), pp. 87110.
    6. 6)
      • 6. American College of Radiology BI-RADS Committee and American College of Radiology: ‘Breast imaging reporting and data system’ (American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA, 1998).
    7. 7)
      • 7. Mudigonda, N.R., Rangayyan, R., Desautels, J.L.: ‘Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses’, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2000, 19, (10), pp. 10321043.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Mu, T., Nandi, A.K., Rangayyan, R.M.: ‘Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers’, J. Digit. Imaging, 2008, 21, (2), pp. 153169.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Ball, J.E., Bruce, L.M.: ‘Digital mammographic computer aided diagnosis (CAD) using adaptive level set segmentation’. 29th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France, 2007, pp. 49734978.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Campos, L., Silva, A., Barros, A.: ‘Diagnosis of breast cancer in digital mammograms using independent component analysis and neural networks’. Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition, Berlin, Germany, 2005, pp. 460469.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Valarmathie, P., Sivakrithika, V., Dinakaran, K.: ‘Classification of mammogram masses using selected texture, shape and margin features with multilayer perceptron classifier’, Biomed. Res., 2016, pp. S310S313.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Rouhi, R., Jafari, M., Kasaei, S., et al: ‘Benign and malignant breast tumors classification based on region growing and CNN segmentation’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2015, 42, (3), pp. 9901002.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Rangayyan, R.M., El-Faramawy, N.M., Desautels, J.L., et al: ‘Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors’, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 1997, 16, (6), pp. 799810.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Boujelben, A., Chaabani, A.C., Tmar, H., et al: ‘Feature extraction from contours shape for tumor analyzing in mammographic images’, Digit. Image Comput., Tech. Appl., 2009, pp. 395399.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Ertas, G., Gulcur, H., Aribal, E., et al: ‘Feature extraction from mammographic mass shapes and development of a mammogram database’. 2001 Proc. of the 23rd Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Istanbul, Turkey, 2001, Vol. 3, pp. 27522755.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Dong, M., Lu, X., Ma, Y., et al: ‘An efficient approach for automated mass segmentation and classification in mammograms’, J. Digit. Imaging, 2015, 28, (5), pp. 613625.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Işkl Esener, İ., Ergin, S., Yüksel, T.: ‘A new ensemble of features for breast cancer diagnosis’. 38th Int. Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 2015, pp. 11681173.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Buciu, I., Gacsadi, A.: ‘Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images’, Biomed. Signal Proc. Control, 2011, 6, (4), pp. 370378.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Varma, M., Zisserman, A.: ‘A statistical approach to texture classification from single images’, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2005, 62, (1–2), pp. 6181.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Varma, M., Zisserman, A.: ‘A statistical approach to material classification using image patch exemplars’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2009, 31, (11), pp. 20322047.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Kinoshita, S.K., Marques, P.A., Slaets, A.F.F., et al: ‘Detection and characterization of mammographic masses by arpngicial neural network’, Digital Mammography, 1998, 13, pp. 489490.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Li, Y., Chen Rohde, H.G.K., Yao, C., et al: ‘Texton analysis for mass classification in mammograms’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2015, 52, pp. 8793.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., et al: ‘The digital database for screening mammography’. Proc. of the 5th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, Medical Physics Publishing, Toronto, Canada, 2000, pp. 212218.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Gabor, D.: ‘Theory of communication’, J. Inst. Electr. Eng. Part III, Radio Commun. Eng., 1946, 93, (26), pp. 429441.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Eibe, F., Mark, A.H., Ian, H.W.: ‘The WEKA Workbench. Online appendix for ‘Data Mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques’’ (Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016, 4th edn.).
    26. 26)
      • 26. Jiao, Z., Gao, X., Wang, Y., et al: ‘A deep feature based framework for breast masses classification’, Neurocomputing, 2016, 197, pp. 221231.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Jadoon, M.M., Zhang, Q., Haq, I.U., et al: ‘Three-class mammogram classification based on descriptive CNN features’, BioMed Res. Int., 2017, 2017, pp. 111.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Ribli, D., Horváth, A., Unger, Z., et al: ‘Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning’, Sci. Rep., 2017, 8, Article number: 4165, p. 4165.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address