Brain tumour classification using two-tier classifier with adaptive segmentation technique

Brain tumour classification using two-tier classifier with adaptive segmentation technique

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A brain tumour is a mass of tissue that is structured by a gradual addition of anomalous cells and it is important to classify brain tumours from the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for treatment. Human investigation is the routine technique for brain MRI tumour detection and tumours classification. Interpretation of images is based on organised and explicit classification of brain MRI and also various techniques have been proposed. Information identified with anatomical structures and potential abnormal tissues which are noteworthy to treat are given by brain tumour segmentation on MRI, the proposed system uses the adaptive pillar K-means algorithm for successful segmentation and the classification methodology is done by the two-tier classification approach. In the proposed system, at first the self-organising map neural network trains the features extracted from the discrete wavelet transform blend wavelets and the resultant filter factors are consequently trained by the K-nearest neighbour and the testing process is also accomplished in two stages. The proposed two-tier classification system classifies the brain tumours in double training process which gives preferable performance over the traditional classification method. The proposed system has been validated with the support of real data sets and the experimental results showed enhanced performance.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Qurat-Ul-Ain, L.G., Kazmi, S.B., Jaffar, M.A., Mirza, A.M.: ‘Classification and segmentation of brain tumor using texture analysis’, Recent Adv. Artif. Intell. Knowl. Eng. Data Bases, 2010, 10, pp. 147155.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Khalid, N.E.A., Ibrahim, S., Haniff, P.N.M.M.: ‘MRI brain abnormalities segmentation using K-nearest neighbors (k-NN)’, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. (IJCSE), 2011, 3, (2), pp. 980990.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Aslam, H.A., Ramashri, T., Ahsan, M.I.A.: ‘A new approach to image segmentation for brain tumor detection using pillar K-means algorithm’, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng., 2013, 2, (3), pp. 14291436.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Maity, A., Pruitt, A.A., Judy, K.D.: ‘Cancer of the central nervous system’ (Clinical Oncology, 2008, 4th edn.).
    5. 5)
      • 5. Ricci, P.E., Dungan, D.H.: ‘Imaging of low and intermediate-grade gliomas’, Semradonc, 2001, 11, (2), pp. 103112.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Rajini, N.H., Narmatha, T., Bhavani, R.: ‘Automatic classification of MR brain tumor images using decision tree’. Special Issue of Int. J. of Computer Applications on Int. Conf. on Electronics, Communication and Information Systems (ICECI 12), 2012, pp. 1013.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Armstrong, T.S., Cohen, M.Z., Weinbrg, J., Gilbert, M.R.: ‘Imaging techniques in neuro oncology’, Semoncnur, 2004, 20, (4), pp. 231239.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Bandyopadhyay, S.K.: ‘Detection of brain tumor-a proposed method’, J. Global Res. Comput. Sci., 2011, 2, (1), pp. 5563.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Anbeek, P., Vincken, K.L., Viergever, M.A.: ‘Automated MS-lesion segmentation by K-nearest neighbor classification’, Midas J. MS Lesion Segmentation (MICCAI 2008 Workshop), 2008.
    10. 10)
      • 10. John, P.: ‘Brain tumor classification using wavelet and texture based neural network’, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2012, 3, (10), pp. 17.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Naik, J., Patel, S.: ‘Tumor detection and classification using decision tree in brain MRI’, Int. J. Eng. Develop. Res., 2013, 14, (6), pp. 4953.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Jayachandran, A., Dhanasekaran, R.: ‘Brain tumor detection and classification of MR images using texture features and fuzzy SVM classifier’, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2013, 6, (12), pp. 22642269.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 15. Padma, A., Sukanesh, R.: ‘Automatic diagnosis of abnormal tumor region from brain computed tomography images using wavelet based statistical texture features’, Int. J. Comput. Sci., Eng. Inf. Technol. (IJCSEIT), 2011, 1, (3).
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 17. Gholipour, A., Asl, A.A., Estroff, J.A., Warfield, S.K.: ‘Multi-atlas multi-shape segmentation of fetal brain MRI for volumetric and morphometric analysis of ventriculo-megaly’, Neuro-Image, 2012, 60, (3), pp. 18191831.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Steenwijk, M.D., Pouwels, P.J.W., Daams, M., et al: ‘Accurate white matter lesion segmentation by k nearest neighbor classification with tissue type priors (kNN-TTPs)’, Neuro-Image, 2013, 3, pp. 462469.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 24. Gonzales, R.C., Woods, R.E.: ‘Digital image processing’ (Prentice Hall, 2002, 2nd edn.).
    25. 25)
      • 25. Ramteke, R.J., Monali, Y.K.: ‘Automatic medical image classification and abnormality detection using K-nearest neighbour’, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res.s, 2012, 2, (4), pp. 190196.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Barakbah Ridho, A., Kiyoki, Y.: ‘A pillar algorithm for k-means optimization by distance maximization for initial centroid designation’. Proc. of IEEE Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, 2009, pp. 6168.
    27. 27)
      • 27. TCIA Collections’, from
    28. 28)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address