Automatic method for white matter lesion segmentation based on T1-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images

Automatic method for white matter lesion segmentation based on T1-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors propose a fast and effective solution for automatic segmentation of white matter lesions by using T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image modalities with no need for manual segmentation and atlas registration. Initially, a brain tissue segmentation method is used to segment the T1 image into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), grey matter and white matter. Based on the obtained tissue segmentation results, the region of interest (ROI) of the FLAIR image is created by subtracting the CSF from the FLAIR image. Subsequently, the authors calculate the z-score of the intensities in the ROI and define a threshold to perform a preliminary identification of abnormalities from normal tissues. The abnormalities obtained at this stage are used as the prior knowledge for the modified level-set technique. The proposed level set method here is applied based on local Gaussian distribution to precisely detect the boundaries of the white matter lesions in the ROI. The level set method based on local Gaussian distribution fitting energy is robust to the intensity inhomogeneity of MR data and therefore capable of precisely extracting the boundaries of white matter lesions. Experimental analysis and quantitative comparisons with the peak-seeking and state-of-the-art white matter lesion segmentation (WMLS) techniques demonstrate that the algorithm is a stable and effective approach which significantly outperforms other trusted solutions for white matter lesion segmentation.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 6. Longstreth, W.T.Jr., Manolio, T.A., Arnold, A., et al.: ‘Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people’, Cardiovasc. Health Study Stroke, 1996, 27, pp. 12741282.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 13. Xie, Y., Tao, X.: ‘White matter lesion segmentation using machine learning and weakly labeled MR images’, SPIE Med. Imaging: Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 2011, 7962, pp. 79622G-1797622G-9.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 17. Bricq, S., Collet, Ch, Armspach, J.P.: ‘Monrovian segmentation of 3D brain MRI to detect multiple sclerosis lesions’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image processing, ICIP'2008, San Diego, USA, 2008, pp. 733736.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 22. Sajja, B.R., Datta, S., He, R., et al: ‘A unified approach for lesion segmentation on MRI of multiple sclerosis’. 26th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEMBS'04, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 17781781.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 26. Liu, J., Smith, C.D., Chebrolu, H.: ‘Automatic multiple sclerosis detection based on integrated square estimation’. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Miami, USA, February 2009, pp. 3138.
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 28. Geremia, E., Menze, B.H., Clatz, O., et al: ‘Spatial decision forests for MS lesion segmentation in multi-channel MR images’, MICCAI 2010, Bejing, China, 2010, vol. 13, No. Pt 1, pp. 111118.
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
      • 30. Dugas-Phocion, G., Gonzalez, M.A., Lebrun, C., et al.: ‘Hierarchical segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in multi sequence MRI’. IEEE Int. Symp. on biomedical imaging: nano to macro, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 157160.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
      • 32. Osher, S.: ‘Geometric level set methods in imaging, vision and graphics’ (Springer, 2003), pp. 320.
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • 36. Punga, M., Gaurav, R., Moraru, L.: ‘Level set method coupled with energy image features for brain MR image segmentation’, Biomed. Eng./Biomedizinische Technik, 2014, 59, (3), 219229.
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
    40. 40)
      • 42. Altman, E.I., et al: ‘Predicting financial distress of companies: revisiting the z-score and ZETA models’, Stern School of Business, New York University, 2000, pp. 912.
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
    43. 43)
    44. 44)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address