http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Empirical investigation into the correlation between vignetting effect and the quality of sensor pattern noise

Empirical investigation into the correlation between vignetting effect and the quality of sensor pattern noise

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
$19.95
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The sensor pattern noise (SPN) is a unique attribute of the content of images that can facilitate identification of source digital imaging devices. Owing to its potential in forensic applications, it has drawn much attention in the digital forensic community. Although much work has been done on the applications of the SPN, investigations into its characteristics have been largely overlooked in the literature. In this study, the authors aim to fill this gap by providing insight into the characteristic dependency of the SPN quality on its location in images. They have observed that the SPN components at the image periphery are not reliable for the task of source camera identification, and tend to cause higher false-positive rates. Empirical evidence is presented in this work. The authors suspect that this location-dependent SPN quality degradation has strong connection with the so-called ‘vignetting effect’, as both exhibit the same type of location dependency. The authors recommend that when image blocks are to be used for forensic investigations, they should be taken from the image centre before SPN extraction is performed in order to reduce false-positive rate.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • Khanna, N., Delp, E.J.: `Source scanner identification for scanned documents', Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, December 2009, London, UK, p. 166–170.
    4. 4)
      • R. Caldelli , I. Amerini , F. Picchioni , A. De Rosa , F. Uccheddu , C.-T. Li . (2009) Multimedia forensic techniques for acquisition device identification and digital image authentication, Handbook of research on computational forensics, digital crime and investigation: methods and solutions.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Li, C.-T.: `Unsupervised classification of digital images using enhanced sensor pattern noise', Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems (ISCAS'10), May 2010, Paris, France, p. 3429–3432.
    7. 7)
      • Caldelli, R., Amerini, I., Picchioni, F., Innocenti, M.: `Fast image clustering of unknown source images', Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, December 2010, Seattle, USA.
    8. 8)
      • Liu, B.-B., Lee, H.-K., Hu, Y., Choi, C.-H.: `On classification of source cameras: a graph based approach', Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, December 2010, Seattle, USA, p. 1–5.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Ng, T.-T., Tsui, M.-P.: `Camera response function signature for digital forensics - part I: theory and data selection', Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, December 2009, London, UK, p. 156–160.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • Lanh, V.T., Emmanuel, S., Kankanhalli, M.S.: `Identifying source cell phone using chromatic aberration', Proc. IEEE Conf. Multimedia and Expo, July 2007, Beijing, China, p. 883–886.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • J.R. Janesick . (2001) Scientific charge-coupled devices.
    21. 21)
      • Li, C.-T., Satta, R.: `On the location-dependent quality of the sensor pattern noise and its implication in multimedia forensics', Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP 2011), November 2011, London, UK, p. 1–6.
    22. 22)
      • B. Rossi . (1957) Optics.
    23. 23)
      • S.F. Ray . (1988) Applied photographic optics.
    24. 24)
      • Goldman, D.B., Chen, J.-H.: `Vignette and exposure calibration and compensation', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision, October 2005, Beijing, China, 1, p. 899–906.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2012.0044
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2012.0044
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address