Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Contour-based iterative pose estimation of 3D rigid object

Contour-based iterative pose estimation of 3D rigid object

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Estimating pose parameters of a 3D rigid object based on a 2D monocular image is a fundamental problem in computer vision. State-of-the-art methods usually assume that certain feature correspondences are available a priori between the input image and object's 3D model. This presumption makes the problem more algebraically tractable. However, when there is no feature correspondence available a priori, how to estimate the pose of a truly 3D object using just one 2D monocular image is still not well solved. In this article, a new contour-based method which solves both the pose estimation problem and the feature correspondence problem simultaneously and iteratively is proposed. The outer contour of the object is firstly extracted from the input 2D grey-level image, then a tentative point correspondence relationship is established between the extracted contour and object's 3D model, based on which object's pose parameters will be estimated; the newly estimated pose parameters are then used to revise the tentative point correspondence relationship, and the process is iterated until convergence. Experiment results are promising, showing that the authors’ method has fast convergence speed and good convergence radius.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • Moreno-Noguer, F., Lepetit, V., Fua, P.: `Accurate non-iterative ', IEEE ICCV’07, Rio de Janeiro, p. 2168–2175.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • Dunker, J., Hartmann, G., Stöhr, M.: `Single view recognition and pose estimation of 3D objects using sets of prototypical views and spatially tolerant contour representations', ICPR’96, 1996, 4, p. 14–18.
    6. 6)
      • González, J.M., Sebastián, J.M., García, D., Sánchez, F., Angel, L.: `Recognition of 3D object from one image based on projective and permutative invariants', ICIAR’04, 2004, 3211, p. 705–712.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • H. Bay , T. Tuytelaars , L.V. Gool , E. Zurich . SURF: speeded up robust features. CVIU , 3 , 346 - 359
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Viksten, F., Forssén, P.E., Johansson, B., Moe, A.: `Comparison of local image descriptors for full 6 degree-of-freedom pose estimation', IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2009, Kobe, Japan, p. 1139–1146.
    12. 12)
      • Donoser, M., Bischof, H.: `Efficient maximally stable extremal region (MSER) tracking', CVPR’06, 2006, 1, p. 553–560.
    13. 13)
      • Tahri, O., Chaumette, F.: `Complex objects pose estimation based on image moment invariants', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, April 2005, Barcelona, Spain, p. 436–441.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • T. Hanning , R. Schoene , S. Graf . A closed form solution for monocular re-projective 3D pose estimation of regular planar patterns. ICIP , 2197 - 2200
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • P.F. Felzenszwalb , D.P. Huttenlocher . Distance transforms of sampled functions.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • Cui, Y., Hildenbrand, D.: `Pose estimation based on geometric algebra', GraVisMa, 2009, p. 17–24.
    23. 23)
      • D.P. Bertsekas . (1982) Constrained optimization and Lagrange multiplier methods.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • Lee, T.K., Drew, M.S.: `3D object recognition by eigen-scale-space of contours', SSVM ’07, 2007, 4485, p. 883–894.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • Leng, D.W., Sun, W.D.: `Finding all the solutions of PnP problem', IEEE IST’09, Shenzhen, p. 348–352.
    28. 28)
      • Shan, G.L., Ji, B., Zhou, Y.F.: `A review of 3D pose estimation from a monocular image sequence', CISP’09, 2009, Tianjin, p. 1–5.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • David, P., DeMenthon, D., Duraiswami, R., Samet, H.: `Simultaneous pose and correspondence determination using line features', CVPR’03, 2003, 2, p. 424–431.
    32. 32)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2010.0098
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2010.0098
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address