Ternary input signal design for system identification

Ternary input signal design for system identification

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Methods for designing two types of periodic ternary input signal used to identify a system in the presence of both noise and nonlinear distortions have been described here. Signals of the first type have even harmonics suppressed, to eliminate errors in odd-order estimates from even-order distortions, and vice-versa. Signals of the second type have harmonic multiples of both two and three suppressed, to further reduce errors from nonlinear distortions. For both types of signal, three design criteria are defined. The first criterion allows the signal energy-amplitude ratio to be maximised, the second allows the signal spectrum uniformity to be maximised and the third allows a compromise to be made between the first two criteria. With the methods described, ternary signals of both types with a very wide range of periods can be obtained for use in this application. Software for computer-aided design of the signals is available on the internet. The signals and their periods are given in tables, and an example is used to show how they are applied.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • Barker, H.A., Tan, A.H., Godfrey, K.R.: `The design of ternary perturbation signals for linear system identification', Tu-M13-TO/6, Proc. 16th. IFAC World Congress, 2005, Prague, Czech Republic.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • I. Kollár . (1994) Frequency domain system identification for use with .
    8. 8)
      • R. Pintelon , J. Schoukens . (2001) System identification: a frequency domain approach.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • D. Everett . Periodic digital sequences with pseudonoise properties. GEC J. Sci. Technol. , 115 - 126
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Foo, M.F.L., Tan, A.H., Basu, K.P.: `Maximum length ternary signal design based on Nyquist point mapping', Proc. 14th. IFAC Symp. on System Identification, March 2006, Newcastle, NSW, Australia, p. 1127–1132.
    13. 13)
      • Barker, H.A.: `G', Proc. 5th IFAC Symp. on Advances in Control Education, December 2000, Gold Coast, QL, Australia, Software available at:
    14. 14)
      • Barker, H.A.: `G', Proc. 12th. IFAC Symp. on System Identification, June 2000, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Software available at:
    15. 15)
      • Tan, A.H., Godfrey, K.R.: `An improved routine for designing multi-level multi-harmonic signals', ID–027, Proc. UKACC Int. Conf. Control 2004, September 2004, Bath, UK, Software available at:
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • Lee, H., Rivera, D.E., Mittelmann, H.D.: `Constrained minimum crest factor multisine signals for ‘plant friendly’ identification of highly interactive systems', Proc. 13th IFAC Symp. on System Identification, August 2003, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    18. 18)
      • H.A. Barker . Primitive maximum-length sequences and pseudo-random signals. Trans. Inst MC , 339 - 348

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address