Fuel–air ratio control for a spark ignition engine using gain-scheduled delay-dependent approach

Fuel–air ratio control for a spark ignition engine using gain-scheduled delay-dependent approach

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A novel approach to fuel–air ratio (FAR) control for spark ignition (SI) engines is presented in this study. The FAR dynamics are modelled as a first-order plus time-varying delay system. Time delay in the control plant is not approximated using the Pade formula. For controller design purposes, it is described as a time-varying delay in the measurement output. A gain-scheduled delay-dependent controller, regarding the time delay as a time-varying parameter, is then designed to track FAR reference and minimise the effects of disturbances on FAR regulation. The proposed controller guarantees the stability of closed-loop system and induced L 2 norm performance using Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional. The design method is then formulated in terms of linear matrix inequalities that leads to a convex optimisation problem and can be solved by parameter gridding technique. Simulation results validate the FAR regulation of proposed controller over the large range of time delay, which covers most engine operating conditions in practice.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Sultan, M.C., Kushion, M.D., Wind, R., Folkerts, C.H., Matthews, G.P.: ‘Closed loop Canister purge control system (No. 980206)’. SAE Technical Paper, 1998.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Yoo, I.K., Upadhyay, D., Rizzoni, G.: ‘A control-oriented carbon Canister model (No. 1999-01-1103)’. SAE Technical Paper, 1999.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Grieve, M.J., Himes, E.G.: ‘Advanced Canister purge algorithm with a virtual [HC] sensor (No. 2000-01-0557)’. SAE Technical Paper, 2000.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 7. Leroy, T., Chauvin, J., Le Solliec, G., Corde, G.: ‘Air path estimation for a turbocharged SI engine with variable valve timing’. Proc. 2007 American Control Conf., New York City, USA, July 2007, pp. 50885093.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Leroy, T., Chauvin, J., Petit, N.: ‘Airpath control of a SI engine with variable valve timing actuators’. Proc. 2008 American Control Conf., Washington, USA, June 2008, pp. 20762083.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 11. Yildiz, Y., Annaswamy, A., Yanakiev, D., Kolmanovsky, I.: ‘Adaptive air fuel ratio control for internal combustion engines’. Proc. 2008 American Control Conf., Washington, USA, June 2008, pp. 20582063.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Meyer, J., Rajagopalan, S.S., Midlam-Mohler, S., Yurkovich, S., Guezennec, Y.: ‘Application of an exhaust geometry based delay prediction model to internal combustion engines’. ASME 2009 Dynamic Systems and Control Conf., California, USA, January 2009, pp. 557563.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 16. Zope, R.A., Mohammadpour, J., Grigoriadis, K.M., Franchek, M.: ‘Air-fuel ratio control of Spark ignition engines with TWC using LPV techniques’. ASME 2009 Dynamic Systems and Control Conf., California, USA, January 2009, pp. 897903.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Postma, M.J., Nagamune, R.: ‘LPV-based air-fuel ratio control of Spark ignition engines using two gain scheduling parameters’. ASME 2010 Dynamic Systems and Control Conf., Massachusetts, USA, January 2010, pp. 665672.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 19. Zope, R., Mohammadpour, J., Grigoriadis, K., Franchek, M.: ‘Robust fueling strategy for an SI engine modeled as an linear parameter varying time-delayed system’. Proc. 2010 American Control Conf., Baltimore, MD, USA, June 2010, pp. 46344639.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Roduner, C.A., Onder, C.H., Geering, H.P.: ‘Automated design of an air/fuel controller for an SI engine considering the three-way catalytic converter in the Hinf approach’. Proc. Fifth IEEE Mediterranean Conf. on Control and Systems, Paphos, Cyprus, 1997, pp. 17.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Mahmoud, M.S., Al-Muthairi, N.F.: ‘Linear parameter-varying state-delay (LPVSD) systems: stability and L2-gain controllers’, Syst. Anal. Model. Simul., 2003, 43, (7), pp. 885915.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 25. Amini, A., Mirzaei, M., Saray, R.K.: ‘Control of air fuel ratio in SI engine using optimization’. Proc. ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conf. on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Istanbul, Turkey, July 2010, pp. 331337.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 29. Zhang, F.: ‘Advanced linear parameter varying control for systems with delays, saturation and implementation constraints’. PhD thesis, University of Houston, 2005.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
      • 36. Choi, S.B.: ‘Design of a robust controller for automotive engines: theory and experiment’. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1993.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address