Distributed estimation using online semi-supervised particle filter for mobile sensor networks

Distributed estimation using online semi-supervised particle filter for mobile sensor networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes an improved particle filter by incorporating semi-supervised machine learning for location estimation in mobile sensor networks (MSNs). A time-varying prior model is learned online as the likelihood of particle filter in order to adapt to dynamic characteristics of state and observation. Thanks to semi-supervised learning, the proposed particle filter can improve efficiency and accuracy, where the amount of available labelled training data is limited. The authors compare the proposed algorithm with the particle filter based on supervised learning. The algorithms are evaluated for received signal strength indicator (RSSI)-based distributed location estimation for MSN in which communication bandwidth and accuracy of the range measurement are limited. First, experimental results show that the semi-supervised algorithm can learn suddenly-changed RSSI characteristics while the supervised learning cannot. Second, the proposed particle filter is more accurate and robust against variations of the environment such as new obstacle configurations. Furthermore, the suggested particle filter shows low statistical variability during repeated experiments, confirmed by much smaller error deviation than the compared particle filter.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 2. Howard, A., Matarić, M.J., Sukhatme, G.S.: ‘Mobile sensor network deployment using potential fields: a distributed, scalable solution to the area coverage problem’, Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, vol. 5, (Springer, 2002), pp. 299308.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 5. Durr, H.-B., Stankovic, M.S., Johansson, K.H.: ‘Distributed positioning of autonomous mobile sensors with application to coverage control’. American Control Conf., 2011, pp. 48224827.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Yoo, J., Kim, H.J.: ‘Semisupervised location awareness in wireless sensor networks using Laplacian support vector regression’, Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw., 2014, 20142014,
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 8. Eriksson, J., Girod, L., Hull, B., Newton, R., Madden, S., Balakrishnan, H.: ‘The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring’. Proc. of the Sixth Int. Conf. on Mobile Systems, Applications, Services, 2008, pp. 2939.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 10. Olfati-Saber, R.: ‘Distributed Kalman filtering for sensor networks’. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 2007, pp. 54925498.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 13. Gu, D.: ‘Distributed particle filter for target tracking’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Autom., 2007, pp. 38563861.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 16. Yoo, J.H., Kim, W., Kim, H.J.: ‘Event-driven gaussian process for object localization in wireless sensor networks’. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2011, pp. 27902795.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 19. Seshadri, V., Zaruba, G.V., Huber, M.: ‘A Bayesian sampling approach to in-door localization of wireless devices using received signal strength indication’. IEEE Int. Conf. Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2005, pp. 7584.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Klepal, M., Pesch, D., et al: ‘Influence of predicted and measured fingerprint on the accuracy of rssi-based indoor location systems’. Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication, 2007, pp. 145151.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Caballero, F., Merino, L., Maza, I., Ollero, A.: ‘A particle filtering method for wireless sensor network localization with an aerial robot beacon’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2008, pp. 596601.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • 23. Zhu, G., Liang, D., Liu, Y., Huang, Q., Gao, W.: ‘Improving particle filter with support vector regression for efficient visual tracking’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 2005, 2, pp. 422425.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Kwon, J., Lee, K.M.: ‘Visual tracking decomposition’. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010, pp. 12691276.
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
      • 32. Zhu, X., Ghahramani, Z., Lafferty, J., et al: ‘Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions’, ICML, 2003, 3, pp. 912919.
    33. 33)
      • 33. Zhou, Z.-H., Li, M.: ‘Semi-supervised regression with co-training’, IJCAI, 2005, pp. 908916.
    34. 34)
      • 34. Chapelle, O., Schölkopf, B., Zien, A., et al: ‘Semi-supervised learning’, vol 2, (MIT press Cambridge, 2006).
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
      • 36. Schölkopf, B., Herbrich, R., Smola, A.J.: ‘A generalized representer theorem’, Computational Learning Theory, (Springer, 2001), pp. 416426.
    37. 37)
      • 37. Suykens, J.A., Van Gestel, T., De Brabanter, J., et al: ‘Least squares support vector machines’, vol 4, (World Scientific, 2002).
    38. 38)
      • 38. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F.: ‘Matrix computations’, vol. 3, (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012).
    39. 39)
      • 39., April, 2014.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address