© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
In this study, we discuss a dynamic scaling approach exploiting the separator-type robust stability condition for discrete-time linear time-invariant systems. We confine ourselves to a class of what we call finite impulse response (FIR) separators, and establish a systematic and practical framework of searching for an FIR separator satisfying the separator-type condition. The first step is to give explicit structure of FIR separators suitable for dealing with a given set of structured uncertainties. The second step is to give an explicit linear matrix inequality condition for the analysis. In particular, a minimal realisation of an augmented system to be dealt with in FIR scaling is derived, which is non-trivial and is very important in reducing the computational load in the numerical computation. Effectiveness of the developed framework is demonstrated numerically, through comparison with the conventional static scaling and μ-analysis.
References
-
-
1)
-
4. Iwasaki, T., Hara, S.: ‘Well-posedness of feedback systems: insights into exact robustness analysis and approximate computations’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1998, 43, (5), pp. 619–630 (doi: 10.1109/9.668829).
-
2)
-
2. Safonov, M.G.: ‘Stability and robustness of multivariable Feedback Systems’ (MIT Press, 1980).
-
3)
-
24. Scherer, C.W., Kose, I.E.: ‘Robustness with dynamic IQCs: an exact state-space characterization of nominal stability with applications to robust estimation’, Automatica, 2008, 44, (7), pp. 1666–1675 (doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.10.023).
-
4)
-
3. Megretski, A., Rantzer, A.: ‘System analysis via integral quadratic constraints’, IEEE Trans. Autm. Control, 1997, 42, (6), pp. 819–830 (doi: 10.1109/9.587335).
-
5)
-
15. Sturm, J.F.: ‘Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones’, Optim. Methods Softw., 1999, 11, (1–4), pp. 625–653 (doi: 10.1080/10556789908805766).
-
6)
-
6. Rantzer, A.: ‘On the Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma’, Syst. Control Lett., 1996, 28, (1), pp. 7–10 (doi: 10.1016/0167-6911(95)00063-1).
-
7)
-
11. Hagiwara, T., Ohara, Y.: ‘Noncausal linear periodically time-varying scaling for robust stability analysis of discrete-time systems: Frequency-dependent scaling induced by static separators’, Automatica, 2010, 46, (1), pp. 167–173 (doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.10.019).
-
8)
-
18. Lawrence, C.T., Tits, A.L., van Dooren, P.: ‘A fast algorithm for the computation of an upper bound on the μ-norm’, Automatica, 2000, 36, (3), pp. 449–456 (doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00165-X).
-
9)
-
17. Balas, G.J., Doyle, J.C., Glover, K., Packard, A., Smith, R.: ‘μ-Analysis and synthesis toolbox user's guide’ (MUSYN Inc. and MathWorks, 1994).
-
10)
-
9. Wahlberg, B.: ‘System identification using Kautz models’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1994, 39, (6), pp. 1276–1282 (doi: 10.1109/9.293196).
-
11)
-
22. Scherer, C., Gahinet, P., Chilali, M.: ‘Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1997, 42, (7), pp. 896–911 (doi: 10.1109/9.599969).
-
12)
-
8. Hagiwara, T.: ‘Note on well-posedness and separator-type robust stability theorem of LTI systems’, SICE J. Control Meas. Syst. Integrat., 2012, 5, (3), pp. 169–174 (doi: 10.9746/jcmsi.5.169).
-
13)
-
13. Hosoe, Y., Hagiwara, T.: ‘Properties of discrete-time noncausal linear periodically time-varying scaling and their relationship with shift-invariance in lifting-timing’, Int. J. Control, 2011, 84, (6), pp. 1067–1079 (doi: 10.1080/00207179.2011.591432).
-
14)
-
16. Zhou, K., Doyle, J.C.: ‘Essentials of robust control’ (Prentice-Hall, 1998).
-
15)
-
21. Roos, C., Lescher, F., Biannic, J.M., Doll, C., Ferreres, G.: ‘A set of μ-analysis based tools to evaluate the robustness properties of high-dimensional uncertain systems’. Proc. IEEE Multi-Conf. on Systems and Control, Denver, USA, September 2011, pp. 644–649.
-
16)
-
19. Ferreres, G., Magni, J.F., Biannic, J.M.: ‘Robustness analysis of flexible structures: practical algorithms’, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2003, 13, (8), pp. 715–733 (doi: 10.1002/rnc.742).
-
17)
-
20. Roos, C., Biannic, J.M.: ‘Efficient computation of a guaranteed stability domain for a high-order parameter dependent plant’. Proc. 2010 American Control Conf., Baltimore, USA, July 2010, pp. 3895–3900.
-
18)
-
1. Desoer, C.A., Vidyasagar, M.: ‘Feedback systems: input–output properties’ (Academic Press, 1975).
-
19)
-
12. Bittanti, S., Colaneri, P.: ‘Periodic systems: filtering and control’ (Springer, 2009).
-
20)
-
14. Hosoe, Y., Hagiwara, T.: ‘Unified treatment of robust stability conditions for discrete-time systems through an infinite matrix framework’, Automatica, 2013, 49, (5), pp. 1488–1493 (doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.02.017).
-
21)
-
23. Oliveira, M.C., Geromel, J.C., Bernussou, J.: ‘Extended H2 and H∞ norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems’, Int. J. Control, 2002, 75, (9), pp. 666–679 (doi: 10.1080/00207170210140212).
-
22)
-
25. Veenman, J., Scherer, C.W.: ‘IQC-synthesis with general dynamic multipliers’. Proc. 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, August 2011, pp. 4600–4605.
-
23)
-
5. Fan, M.K.H., Tits, A.L., Doyle, J.C.: ‘Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics’, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1991, 36, (1), pp. 25–38 (doi: 10.1109/9.62265).
-
24)
-
7. Hosoe, Y., Hagiwara, T.: ‘Robust stability analysis based on discrete-time FIR scaling’. Proc. 2012 American Control Conf., Montreal, Canada, June 2012, pp. 5972–5979.
-
25)
-
10. Wahlberg, B., Makila, P.M.: ‘On approximation of stable linear dynamical systems using Laguerre and Kautz functions’, Automatica, 1996, 32, (5), pp. 693–708 (doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(95)00198-0).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2013.0053
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2013.0053
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6