Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Set membership approximations of predictive control laws: the tradeoff between accuracy and complexity

Set membership approximations of predictive control laws: the tradeoff between accuracy and complexity

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes two new techniques, in the framework of set membership (SM) theory, to derive off-line an approximation of a given non-linear model predictive control (NMPC) law. The obtained approximated control laws satisfy input constraints and guarantee a bounded worst-case approximation error. Such a bound can be tuned to obtain a tradeoff between closed-loop performance, on-line evaluation complexity, off-line computational burden and memory usage. The presented techniques are suboptimal, since their worst-case approximation error is not minimal; however, they are able to obtain good accuracy with efficient on-line computation. Both approaches are based on the prior information given by a finite number ν of nominal control moves, computed off-line and stored. The first technique relies on the piecewise linear interpolation of the off-line computed data, while the second approach is based on the computation of the (suboptimal) upper and lower bounds of the nominal NMPC law, on the basis of the partial information given by a subset of the whole off-line computed data. A numerical example and an automotive case study are presented in order to show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches and to compare their performance.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • M. Alamir . (2006) Stabilization of nonlinear systems by receding-horizon control schemes: parametrized approach for fast systems.
    3. 3)
      • R. Rajamani . (2005) Vehicle dynamics and control.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • J. Traub , H. Woźniakowski . (1980) A general theory of optimal algorithms.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Fagiano, L., Canale, M., Milanese, M.: `Set membership approximation of discontinuous nmpc laws', 48thIEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, December 2009, Shanghai, China, p. 8636–8641.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • C.S. Blagovest . (1990) Hausdorff approximations.
    18. 18)
      • E. Bakker , L. Lidner , H. Pacejka . A new tyre model with an application in vehicle dynamics studies. SAE Paper 890087
    19. 19)
      • J. Nocedal , S.J. Wright . (1999) Numerical optimization.
    20. 20)
      • Ulbig, A., Olaru, S., Dumur, D., Boucher, P.: `Explicit solutions for nonlinear model predictive control: a linear mapping approach', Ninth European Control Conf., 2007, p. 3295–3302.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address