Design of balanced proportional–integral–derivative controllers based on bilevel optimisation

Access Full Text

Design of balanced proportional–integral–derivative controllers based on bilevel optimisation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A bilevel optimisation framework is proposed to find the proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller with balanced performance in terms of transient response, actuator preservation and robustness. In the lower level problem, the transient performance is optimised so that the balanced controller can be designed with minimal controller output variation in the upper level problem, where the requirement on transient performance is relaxed to a pre-specified extent. The robustness of the system is guaranteed by constraints on the maximum sensitivity in both problems. The trade-off between transient performance and actuator preservation is controlled uniformly for diverse process dynamics by a single parameter, which characterises the uniformness of relaxation in transient performance. By choosing different values of this parameter, tuning rules are provided for first order plus time delay (FOPTD) processes for set point following and load disturbance rejection, respectively. The efficiency of these tuning rules is demonstrated by examples covering the whole plant family set.

Inspec keywords: optimisation; three-term control; transient response; delays; control system synthesis

Other keywords: load disturbance rejection; transient response; FOPTD; set point following; diverse process dynamics; first order plus time delay processes; bilevel optimisation framework; minimal controller output variation; balanced proportional-integral-derivative controller design; actuator preservation

Subjects: Optimisation techniques; Control system analysis and synthesis methods; Distributed parameter control systems

References

    1. 1)
      • K.J. Astrom , T. Hagglund . (2005) Advanced PID control.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • A.V. Oppenheim , A.S. Willsky , S.H. Nawab . (1983) Signals & systems.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Shi, D.W., Wang, J.Z., Ma, L.L., Zhao, J.B.: `Design of plant-friendly PID controllers based on constrained optimization', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation and Logistics, 2009, Shenyang, China, p. 337–342.
    7. 7)
      • Klan, P., Gorez, R.: `PI controller design for actuator preservation', Proc. 17th IFAC World Congress, 2008, Seoul, Korea.
    8. 8)
      • Balestrino, A., Landi, A., Medaglia, M., Satler, M.: `Performance indices and tuning in process control', Proc. 14th Mediterranean Conf. on Control and Automation, 2006, Ancona, Italy, p. 1–6.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Klan, P., Gorez, R.: `On aggressiveness of PI control', Proc. 16th IFAC World Congress, 2005, Praha, Czech.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • G. Buckbee . Poor controller tuning drives up valve costs. Control Mag. , 47 - 51
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0561
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0561
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading