Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Proportional-integral-derivative λ-tuning for integrating processes with deadtime

Proportional-integral-derivative λ-tuning for integrating processes with deadtime

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Over the past 15 years, a number of model-based proportional-integral-derivative (PID) tuning methods have been developed for systems that can be described as integrating-with-deadtime. This was motivated by the observation that the initial open-loop response of lag-dominant processes, such as tray temperature in high-purity distillation columns, resembles that of a delayed ramp variable. This study compares the behaviour of several PID λ-tuning rules with the Skogestad internal model control (or SIMC) proportional-integral (PI) controller on simulated integrator-plus-deadtime and lag-dominant first-order plants. Guidelines are provided for selecting the most appropriate tuning method for a given application based on the primary function of the feedback loop (servo against regulatory) as well as the relative importance of control effort and robustness. In contrast, the PID version of the Tyreus–Luyben controller, a popular strategy for this class of models, was found to yield excellent setpoint following but sluggish rejection of unmeasured disturbances acting at the plant input.

References

    1. 1)
      • L. Wang , T.J.D. Barnes , W.R. Cluett . New frequency-domain design method for PID controllers. IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl. , 265 - 271
    2. 2)
      • M.J. Grimble , M.A. Johnson . (1988) Optimal control and stochastic estimation: theory and applications.
    3. 3)
      • W.L. Luyben . (1990) Process modeling, simulation and control for chemical engineers.
    4. 4)
      • M.L. Luyben , W.L. Luyben . (1997) Essentials of process control.
    5. 5)
      • W.L. Luyben . Effect of derivative algorithm and tuning selection on the PID control of dead-time processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 3605 - 3611
    6. 6)
      • M.W. Foley , R.H. Julien , B.R. Copeland . A comparison of PID controller tuning methods. Can. J. Chem. Eng. , 712 - 722
    7. 7)
      • M. Morari , E. Zafirou . (1989) Robust process control.
    8. 8)
      • S. Skogestad . Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J. Proc. Control , 291 - 309
    9. 9)
      • T.E. Marlin . (1995) Process control: designing processes and control systems for dynamic performance.
    10. 10)
      • A.J. Isaksson , S.F. Graebe . Derivative filter is an integral part of PID design. IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl. , 41 - 45
    11. 11)
      • D. Chen , D.E. Seborg . PI/PID controller design based on direct synthesis and disturbance rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 4807 - 4822
    12. 12)
      • G.F. Franklin , J.D. Powell , M. Workman . (1997) Digital control of dynamic systems.
    13. 13)
      • K. Aström . (1970) Introduction to stochastic control theory.
    14. 14)
      • J.E. Arbogast , D.J. Cooper . Extension of IMC tuning correlations for non-self regulating (integrating) processes. ISA Trans. , 303 - 311
    15. 15)
      • D.E. Rivera , M. Morari , S. Skogestad . Internal model control. 4. PID controller design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. , 252 - 265
    16. 16)
      • L. Wang , W.R. Cluett . Tuning PID controllers for integrating processes. IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl. , 385 - 392
    17. 17)
      • C.A. Smith , A.B. Corripio . (1997) Principles and practice of automatic process control.
    18. 18)
      • I.-L. Chien , P.S. Fruehauf . Consider IMC tuning to improve controller performance. Chem. Eng. Progress , 33 - 41
    19. 19)
      • D.E. Seborg , T.F. Edgar , D.A. Mellichamp . (1989) Process dynamics and control.
    20. 20)
      • Rice, R., Cooper, D.J.: `Design and tuning of PID controllers for integrating (non-self regulating) processes', Proc. ISA Annual Meeting, 2002, p. 424–434.
    21. 21)
      • S. Skogestad . (1996) I. Postlethwaite, multivariable feedback control: analysis and design.
    22. 22)
      • M.W. Foley , N.R. Ramharack , B.R. Copeland . Comparison of PI controller tuning methods. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 6741 - 6750
    23. 23)
      • A. Kaya , T.J. Scheib . Tuning of PID controls of different structures. Control Eng. , 62 - 65
    24. 24)
      • Olsen, T., Bialkowski, W.L.: `Lambda tuning as a promising controller tuning method for the refinery', Proc. A.I.Ch.E. Spring National Meeting, 2002.
    25. 25)
      • K.J. Aström , T. Hägglund . (1995) PID controllers: theory, design and tuning.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2008.0306
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2008.0306
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address