Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Fault data injection attack on car-following model and mitigation based on interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller

This is an open access article published by the IET under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Received 25/04/2018, Accepted 17/10/2018, Revised 20/09/2018, Published 19/10/2018

Cyber defence mechanism is started with modelling the accurate car-following behaviour including cyber attack. The creation of finest models made the path of control action easier. The connection between the vehicles is mathematically formulated with the help of car-following behaviour, incorporating the derived acceleration function from the cruise control physical system. The modified car-following model is simulated as closed-loop control system to analyse its behaviour in terms of acceleration and distance. Fault data injection cyber attack is mathematically injected into the modified car-following model and simulated to analyse the impact of attack. Initially, the impact of fault data injection attack is detected and mitigated with the help of parallel proportional–integral–derivative controller and genetic algorithm tuned proportional–integral–derivative controller. Interval type-2 fuzzy proportional–integral–derivative controller is introduced to mitigate the cyber attack and to overcome the uncertainty. The integral square error and integral absolute error are used to compare the performance of the controllers. Inbuilt Wi-Fi connected car like mobile robots are used in real-time model. This model is designed and developed based on the Node MCU processors, real-time operating system, sensors and actuators.

Inspec keywords: closed loop systems; fuzzy control; three-term control; genetic algorithms; fuzzy set theory; mobile robots

Other keywords: Wi-Fi connected car; integral absolute error; interval type-2 fuzzy proportional–integral–derivative controller; derived acceleration function; real-time model; interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller; modified car-following; finest models; integral square error; fault data injection attack; cyber defence mechanism; cruise control physical system; accurate car-following; fault data injection cyber attack; closed-loop control system; parallel proportional–integral–derivative controller; control action

Subjects: Fuzzy control; Data security; Optimisation techniques; Combinatorial mathematics; Optimisation techniques

References

    1. 1)
      • 21. Kharol, A., Patil, P., Raiwani, S., et al: ‘A comparison study for control and stabilisation of inverted pendulum on inclined surface (IPIS) using PID and fuzzy controllers’, Recent Trends Eng. Mater. Sci. Perspect. Sci., 2016, 8, (1), pp. 187–190.
    2. 2)
      • 29. Sobol, I.M.: ‘Sensitivity estimates for non-linear mathematical models’, Math. Model. Comput. Exp., 1993, 1, (4), pp. 407–414.
    3. 3)
      • 38. Hisdal, E.: ‘The IF THEN ELSE statement and interval-valued fuzzy sets of higher type’, Int. J. Man–Mach. Stud., 1981, 15, (4), pp. 385–455.
    4. 4)
      • 12. Lopez, C., Sargolzaei, A., Santana, H., et al: ‘Smart grid cyber security: an overview of threats and countermeasures’, J. Energy Power Eng., 2015, 9, (2015), pp. 632–647.
    5. 5)
      • 36. Prabhakar, G., Selvaperumal, S., Nedumal Pugazhenthi, P.: ‘Fuzzy PD plus I control based adaptive cruise control system in simulation and real-time environment’, IETE J. Res., 2018, pp. 1–11, doi: 10.1080/03772063.2017.1407269.
    6. 6)
      • 42. Taskin, A., Kumbasar, T.: ‘An open source MATLAB/Simulink toolbox for interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems’. Proc. IEEE Symp. Series on Computational Intelligence, Cape Town, SA, 7–10 December 2015, pp. 1561–1568.
    7. 7)
      • 25. Castillo, O., Amador-Angulo, L., Castro, J.R., et al: ‘A comparative study of type-1 fuzzy logic systems, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems and generalized type-2 fuzzy logic systems in control problems’, Inf. Sci., 2016, 354, (1), pp. 257–274.
    8. 8)
      • 3. Amin, S., Cardenas, A.A., Sastry, S.S.: ‘Safe and secure networked control systems under denial-of-service attacks’. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, San Francisco, 2009, pp. 31–45.
    9. 9)
      • 32. Zhang, L., Sun, J., Orosz, G.: ‘Hierarchical design of connected cruise control in the presence of information delays and uncertain vehicle dynamics’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2018, 26, (1), pp. 139–150.
    10. 10)
      • 41. Aminifar, S., Marzuki, A.: ‘Uncertainty in interval type-2 fuzzy systems’, Math. Probl. Eng., 2013, 2013, (1), pp. 1–16.
    11. 11)
      • 2. Schwung, A.: ‘Cyber-physical modeling of compression systems using hybrid automata’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Gothenburg, 24–28 August 2015, pp. 1125–1130.
    12. 12)
      • 1. Kwon, C., Hwang, M.: ‘Cyber attack mitigation for cyber-physical systems: hybrid system approach to controller design’, IET Control Theory Applic., 2016, 10, (7), pp. 731–741.
    13. 13)
      • 10. Abaspour, A., Sadeghi, M., Sadati, H.: ‘Using fuzzy logic in dynamic inversion flight controller with considering uncertainties’. Proc. Iranian Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (IFSC), Iran, 27–29 August 2013, pp. 1–6.
    14. 14)
      • 4. Liu, Y., Ning, P., Reiter, M.K.: ‘False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids’. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. on Computer and Communications Security, New York, 9–13 November 2009, pp. 21–32.
    15. 15)
      • 17. Di-Battista, J., Christophe Courrege, J., Rouzeyre, B., et al: ‘When failure analysis meets side-channel attacks’. Proc. 12th Int. Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 17–20 August 2010, pp. 188–202.
    16. 16)
      • 30. Homma, T., Saltelli, A.: ‘Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 1996, 52, (1), pp. 1–17.
    17. 17)
      • 27. Cukier, R.I., Fortuin, C.M., Schuler, K.E., et al: ‘Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I theory’, J. Chem. Phys., 2003, 59, (8), pp. 3873–3878.
    18. 18)
      • 40. Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Liu, F.: ‘Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple’, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2006, 14, (6), pp. 808–821.
    19. 19)
      • 22. O'Dywer, A.: ‘Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules’ (Imperial College Press, Dublin Institute of Technology, Singapore, 2009, 3rd edn.).
    20. 20)
      • 13. Sargolzaei, A., Kang, K.Y., Abdelghani, M.N.: ‘Preventing time-delay switch attack on load frequency control in distributed power systems’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2016, 7, (2), pp. 1176–1185.
    21. 21)
      • 31. Al-Jhayyish, A.M.H., Schmidt, K.W.: ‘Feed-forward strategies for cooperative adaptive cruise control in heterogeneous vehicle strings’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2018, 19, (1), pp. 113–122.
    22. 22)
      • 39. Liang, Q., Mendel, J.M.: ‘Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design’, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2000, 8, (5), pp. 535–550.
    23. 23)
      • 34. Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Helbing, D.: ‘Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity’, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 2010, 368, (1), pp. 4585–4605.
    24. 24)
      • 35. Yang, L., Zhang, X., Gong, J., et al: ‘The research of car-following model based on real-time maximum deceleration’, Math. Probl. Eng., 2015, 2015, (1), pp. 1–10.
    25. 25)
      • 20. Sargolzaei, A., Yen, K.K., Abdelghani, M., et al: ‘Generalized attack model for networked control systems, evaluation of control methods’, Intell. Control Autom., 2017, 8, (3), pp. 164–174.
    26. 26)
      • 5. Teixeira, A., Amin, S., Sandberg, H., et al: ‘Cyber security analysis of state estimators in electric power systems’. Proc. 49th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–17 December 2010, pp. 5991–5998.
    27. 27)
      • 6. Esfahani, P.M., Vrakopoulou, M., Margellos, K., et al: ‘A robust policy for automatic generation control cyber attack in two area power network’. Proc. 49th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–17 December 2010, pp. 5973–5978.
    28. 28)
      • 26. Saltelli, A., Sobol, I.M.: ‘About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 1995, 50, (3), pp. 225–239.
    29. 29)
      • 19. Yuan, Y., Li, Z., Ren, K.: ‘Modeling load redistribution attacks in power systems’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2011, 2, (2), pp. 382–390.
    30. 30)
      • 14. Abbaspour, A., Yen, K.K., Noei, S., et al: ‘Detection of fault data injection attack on UAV using adaptive neural network’, Procedia Comput. Sci., 2016, 95, (1), pp. 193–200.
    31. 31)
      • 18. Moradi, A., Mischke, O., Paar, C., et al: ‘On the power of fault sensitivity analysis and collision side-channel attacks in a combined setting’. Proc. 12th Int. Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 17–20 August 2010, pp. 292–311.
    32. 32)
      • 15. Abbaspour, A., Aboutalebi, P., Yen, K.K., et al: ‘Neural adaptive observer-based sensor and actuator fault detection in nonlinear systems: application in UAV’, ISA Trans., 2017, 67, (3), pp. 317–329.
    33. 33)
      • 37. Ciuffo, B., Punzo, V., Montanino, M.: ‘Global sensitivity analysis techniques to simplify the calibration of traffic simulation models. Methodology and application to the IDM car-following model’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 8, (5), pp. 479–489.
    34. 34)
      • 23. Tamara, J., Noemi, M.: ‘An auto-tuning PID control system based on genetic algorithms to provide delay guarantees in passive optical networks’, Expert Syst. Appl., 2015, 42, (23), pp. 9211–9220.
    35. 35)
      • 28. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., et al: ‘Global sensitivity analysis. The primer’ (John Wiley and Sons, Oxford, UK, 2008).
    36. 36)
      • 7. Mo, Y., Garone, E., Casavola, A., et al: ‘False data injection attacks against state estimation in wireless sensor networks’. Proc. 49th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–17 December 2010, pp. 5967–5972.
    37. 37)
      • 16. Sargolzaei, A., Yen, K.K., Abdelghani, M.: ‘Time-delay switch attack on load frequency control in smart grid’, J. Adv. Commun. Technol., 2014, 5, (1), pp. 55–64.
    38. 38)
      • 33. Noei, S., Sargolzaei, A., Abbaspour, A., et al: ‘A decision support system for improving resiliency of cooperative adaptive cruise control systems’, Procedia Comput. Sci., 2016, 95, (1), pp. 489–496.
    39. 39)
      • 24. Eiben, A.E., Smith, J.E.: ‘Introduction to evolutionary computation’ (Springer Verlag, London, 2015, 2nd edn.).
    40. 40)
      • 11. Liu, S., Liu, X.P., Saddik, A.E.: ‘Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks on load frequency control in smart grids’. Proc. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), IEEE PES, Washington DC, USA, 24–27 February 2013, pp. 1–6.
    41. 41)
      • 8. Kosut, O., Liyan, J., Thomas, R.J., et al: ‘Malicious data attacks on the smart grid’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2011, 2, (1), pp. 645–658.
    42. 42)
      • 9. Arney, D., Venkatasubramanian, K.K., Sokolsky, O., et al: ‘Biomedical devices and systems security’. Proc. 33rd Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC ‘11), Boston, 30 August–3 September 2011, pp. 2376–2379.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cps.2018.5012
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cps.2018.5012
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address