Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

The performance and efficiency of envelope elimination and restoration transmitters for future multiple-input multiple-output wireless local area networks

The performance and efficiency of envelope elimination and restoration transmitters for future multiple-input multiple-output wireless local area networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The inefficiency of contemporary power amplifiers (PAs), when operating in their linear region, is a major obstacle to mobile operation of wireless local area networks (WLANs) based on IEEE 802.11n. Therefore the use of more efficient envelope elimination and restoration (EER) transmitter architectures is considered. In addition to high efficiency it is also necessary to satisfy the spectral mask and achieve satisfactory link-level performance. Link-level simulations of a contemporary WLAN PA show that, at the power back-offs necessary to achieve sufficient linearity, the power added efficiency (PAE) is only ∼1% for a system with four transmit antennas. In contrast, simulations of a phase feedback EER PA architecture show that it is possible to achieve an average PAE of 70%, while satisfying the spectral mask, with only a small degradation in link-level performance.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • Sokal, N.O.: `Class-E switching-mode high-efficiency tuned RF/microwave power amplifier: improved design equations', International Microwave Symp., 11–16 June 2000, Digest, 2, p. 779–782.
    3. 3)
      • ‘Power consumption and Energy efficiency comparisons of WLAN products’, White paper by Atheros 2003, available at: http://www.atheros.com/pt/whitepapers/atheros_power_white paper.pdf., accessed on 4 October 2007.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Sevic, J.F.: `Statistical characterization of RF power amplifier efficiency for CDMA wireless communication systems', Proc. Wireless Communications Conf., August 1997, p. 110–113.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • Nesimoglu, T., Morris, K.A., Parker, S.C.J., Mcgeehan, J.P.: `Improved EER transmitters for WLAN', IEEE Radio and Wireless Symp., 17–19 January 2006, San Diego, California, USA, p. 239–242.
    10. 10)
      • Rapp, C.: `Effects of the HPA-nonlinearity on a 4-DPSK/OFDM signal for a digital sound broadcasting system', 2ndEuropean Conf. Satellite Communications, October 1991, Belgium, p. 179–184.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Bougard, B., Pollin, S., Lenoir, G.: `Energy-scalability enhancement of wireless local area network transceivers', IEEE 5th Workshop on Signal Proc. Advances in Wireless Communications, 11–14 July 2004, p. 449–453.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • S.C. Cripps . (1999) RF power amplifiers for wireless communications.
    18. 18)
      • Nesimoglu, T., Canagarajah, C.N., Mcgeehan, J.P.: `A broadband polynomial predistorter for reconfigurable radio', IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf., May 2001, Rhodes, p. 1968–1972.
    19. 19)
      • Ghorbani, A., Sheikhan, M.: `The effect of solid state power amplifiers (SSPAs) nonlinearities on MPSK and M-QAM signal transmission', 6thInt. Conf. Digital Processing of Signals in Communications, 2–6 September 1991, p. 193–197.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • Sokal, N.O.: `RF power amplifiers, classes A through S-how they operate, and when to use each', Professional Program Proc. Electronics Industries Forum of New England, 6–8 May 1997, p. 179–252.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • K. Mori , T. Nagaosa , H. Kobayashi . Uplink packet transmission control for asymmetric traffic in CDMA/shared-TDD cellular packet communications. IEICE Trans. Commun. , 9 , 2620 - 2627
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
      • IEEE 802.11 TGn Comparison Criteria. Document No. 11-03-0814-24-000n-comparison-criteria.doc. Issued by TGn on 6 April 2004.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • A.J. Cann . Nonlinearity model with variable knee sharpness. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , 874 - 877
    32. 32)
      • V. Erceg , L. Schumacher , P. Kyritsi , A. Molisch , D.S. Baum . TGn channel models’, IEEE 802.11-03/r2, January 2004.
    33. 33)
      • http://eesof.tm.agilent.com/products/ads_main.html, accessed on 4 October 2007.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com_20070171
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com_20070171
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address