Automatic modulation classification of composite FM/PM speech signals in sensor arrays over flat fading channel

Automatic modulation classification of composite FM/PM speech signals in sensor arrays over flat fading channel

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A method for automatic classification of composite FM/PM speech signals is proposed here. The method classifies a number of intercepted signals into FM or PM, provided that each signal is either speech FM or PM. The signals are transmitted through flat fading channels and contaminated with white Gaussian noise. A linear array consisting of several sensors is constructed to intercept these signal. The minimum description length criterion is used to estimate the number of intercepted signals. The maximum likelihood approach is used to estimate the direction of arrival of each signal, the fading channel, coefficients and the noise variance. The classification procedure is based on estimation of the phase waveform which contains the speech signal. An iterative algorithm is derived to perform this estimate for each signal and then the resulting estimate is used to develop a method to determine, for each signal, if it is FM or PM. The method is based on evaluating the power spectral density of the instantaneous frequency of the intercepted signal which is distinctive in speech FM and PM signals. Computer simulations are performed to validate the theoretical developments.


    1. 1)
      • Richterova, M.: `Signal modulation recognition based on method of artificial networks', Progress in Electromag. Research Symposium, August 2005, Hangzhou, China.
    2. 2)
      • Wu, Z., Wang, X., Liu, C., Ren, G.: `Automatic digital modulation recognition based on ART2A-DWNN', Proc. 2nd Int. Symp., on Neural Networks, May 2005, Chongqing, China.
    3. 3)
      • A. Ôengür , H. Güldemır . An educational interface for automatic recognition of analog modulated signals. J. Appl. Sci. , 3 , 513 - 516
    4. 4)
      • Chen, J., Kuo, Y., Fu, F., Li, C., Li, J.: `Digital modulation identification based on software radio platform', 6thInt. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Computing Applications and Technologies (PDCAT'05), 2005, p. 945–949.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • E. Fisher , M. Grosmann , H. Messer . Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria: general asymptotic performance analysis. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , 5 , 1027 - 1036
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • J. Narvorro , J. Ruiz-Molina , M. Valderrama . A solution to linear estimation problems using approximate Karhunen–Loeve expansions. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 4 , 1677 - 1682
    11. 11)
      • J. Narvorro , J. Ruiz-Molina , M. Valderrama . Differentiation of the modified approximate Karhunen–Loeve expansion of a stochastic process. Statist. Prob. Lett. , 91 - 98
    12. 12)
      • W. Charles . (1992) Discreate random signals and statistical signal processing.
    13. 13)
      • S. Mallat , G. Papanicolaou , Z. Zhang . Adaptive covariance estimation of locally stationary processes. Ann. Stat. , 1 , 1 - 47
    14. 14)
      • H.L. Van Trees . (1971) Detection, estimation, and modulation theory.
    15. 15)
      • L.W. Couch . (1997) Digital and analog communication systems.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address