Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Improving energy efficiency in massive MIMO: joint digital beam-steering and tone-reservation PAPR reduction

Improving energy efficiency in massive MIMO: joint digital beam-steering and tone-reservation PAPR reduction

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy eFirst article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, the authors propose a novel architecture based on the combination of peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) reduction with digital beamforming (BF) for mm-wave massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. In order to keep the power amplifiers (PAs) working at the same input back-off thus maximising the system power efficiency, they propose to perform time-domain transmit beam-steering by adding progressive time delays to the signals at each antenna element, while keeping the amplitude weights unitary. They show that these time delays can be obtained with a finite impulse response filter implementation of time-domain fractional delay filter structures such as Lagrange interpolation polynomials. They also introduce an analysis on the PAPR of the interpolated signals, where they derive an upper bound to it and show that its value is similar to that of the signal at the input of the interpolation filters, showing the feasibility of the proposed method. In addition, they present a detailed analysis where they show that a significant reduction in computational complexity is obtained when compared to frequency-domain BF. Simulation results validate that the novel proposed scheme combining PAPR reduction and digital BF offers high-precision beam-steering maintaining reduced PAPR in the delayed signals fed to the antennas.


    1. 1)
      • 24. Kootsookos, P.J., Williamson, R.C.: ‘FIR approximation of fractional sample delay systems’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Analog Digit. Signal Process., 1996, 43, pp. 269271.
    2. 2)
      • 21. Salim, T., Devlin, J., Whittington, J.: ‘FPGA implementation of a phased array DBF using a latch method’. 2004 Int. Networking and Communication Conf., Lahore, Pakistan, June 2004, pp. 6468.
    3. 3)
      • 1. ETSI: ‘5GNR Physical channels and modulation’. Standard, ETSI TS 38 211 V15.2.0 Technical Specification, 2018.
    4. 4)
      • 19. Jeon, J.: ‘NR wide bandwidth operations’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2018, 56, pp. 4246.
    5. 5)
      • 26. Al-Jawhar, Y.A., Ramli, K.N., Mustapha, A., et al: ‘Reducing PAPR with low complexity for 4G and 5G waveform designs’, IEEE Access, 2019, 7, pp. 9767397688.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Molu, M.M., Xiao, P., Khalily, M., et al: ‘Low-complexity and robust hybrid beamforming design for multi-antenna communication systems’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2018, 17, pp. 14451459.
    7. 7)
      • 22. Lai, C., Tan, K., Chen, Y., et al: ‘A UWB impulse-radio timed-array radar with time-shifted direct-sampling architecture in 0.18-μm CMOS’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Regul. Pap., 2014, 61, pp. 20742087.
    8. 8)
      • 20. Hung, Y., Tsai, S.L.: ‘PAPR analysis and mitigation algorithms for beamforming MIMO OFDM systems’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2014, 13, pp. 25882600.
    9. 9)
      • 23. Laakso, T.I., Valimaki, V., Karjalainen, M., et al: ‘Splitting the unit delay [FIR/all pass filters design]’, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 1996, 13, pp. 3060.
    10. 10)
      • 16. Lahbabi, N., Bulusu, S.S.K.C., Hélard, J., et al: ‘Very efficient tone reservation PAPR reduction fully compatible with ATSC 3.0 standard: performance and practical implementation analysis’, IEEE Access, 2018, 6, pp. 5835558372.
    11. 11)
      • 8. Kutty, S., Sen, D.: ‘Beamforming for millimeter wave communications: an inclusive survey’, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 2016, 18, pp. 949973.
    12. 12)
      • 9. Gregorio, F., González, G., Schmidt, C., et al: ‘Signal processing techniques for power efficient wireless communication systems: practical approaches for RF impairments reduction. signals and communication technology’ (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2019).
    13. 13)
      • 15. Bulusu, S.S.K.C., Crussière, M., Hélard, J., et al: ‘Quasi-optimal tone reservation PAPR reduction algorithm for next generation broadcasting systems: a performance/complexity/latency tradeoff with testbed implementation’, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., 2018, 64, pp. 883899.
    14. 14)
      • 17. ETSI: ‘5GNR Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception’. Standard, ETSI TS 138 104 V15.5.0 Technical Specification, 2019.
    15. 15)
      • 5. Larsson, E.G., Edfors, O., Tufvesson, F., et al: ‘Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2014, 52, pp. 186195.
    16. 16)
      • 14. ASTC3: ‘Physical Layer Protocol (A/322)’. Standard, Advanced Television Systems Committee, December 2018.
    17. 17)
      • 10. Venkateswaran, V., Pivit, F., Guan, L.: ‘Hybrid RF and digital beamformer for cellular networks: algorithms, microwave architectures, and measurements’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2016, 64, pp. 22262243.
    18. 18)
      • 25. Sandoval, F., Poitau, G., Gagnon, F.: ‘Hybrid peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques: review and performance comparison’, IEEE Access, 2017, 5, pp. 2714527161.
    19. 19)
      • 11. Han, S., Xu, C.I.Z., Rowell, C.: ‘Large-scale antenna systems with hybrid analog and digital beamforming for millimeter wave 5G’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2015, 53, pp. 186194.
    20. 20)
      • 2. Parkvall, S., Dahlman, E., Furuskar, A., et al: ‘NR: the new 5G radio access technology’, IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag., 2017, 1, pp. 2430.
    21. 21)
      • 7. Heath, R.W., González-Prelcic, N., Rangan, S., et al: ‘An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave mimo systems’, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., 2016, 10, pp. 436453.
    22. 22)
      • 12. Kuai, L., Chen, J., Jiang, Z.H., et al: ‘A N260 band 64 channel millimeter wave full-digital multi-beam array for 5G massive MIMO applications’, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, pp. 4764047653.
    23. 23)
      • 13. ETSI: ‘Frame structure channel coding and modulation for a second generation digital terrestrial television broadcasting system (DVB-T2)’. Standard, ETSI EN 302 755 V1.1.1, September 2009.
    24. 24)
      • 3. Li, Y.R., Gao, B., Zhang, X., et al: ‘Beam management in millimeter-wave communications for 5G and beyond’, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, pp. 1328213293.
    25. 25)
      • 18. Elshafiy, A., Sampath, A.: ‘Beam broadening for 5G millimeter wave systems’. 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), Marrakech, Morocco, April 2019, pp. 16.
    26. 26)
      • 6. Buzzi, S., D'Andrea, C.: ‘Energy efficiency and asymptotic performance evaluation of beamforming structures in doubly massive MIMO mmwave systems’, IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., 2018, 2, pp. 385396.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address