Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Evaluation of next-generation low-power communication technology to replace GSM in IoT-applications

This is an open access article published by the IET under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/)
Received 12/02/2019, Accepted 24/06/2019, Revised 16/06/2019, Published 28/06/2019

The large demand for smart metering and control, asset tracking, remote monitoring, and other applications has resulted in the emergence of innovative new internet of things (IoT) low-power wide-area networks (LPWANs) featuring low power consumption, low cost, high scalability and low data rate transmissions. This article compares the performance of LoRaWAN, Sigfox, and NB-IoT as emerging technologies, in terms of power consumption, throughput, scalability, and range. For practical reasons, the comparison also includes cellular GPRS. Although GPRS does not fit the description of LPWAN technologies, it is a legacy method for IoT communications and provides insight into application areas where LPWAN technology can be applied. The study gives a clear comparative overview of the advantages and shortcomings of the various communication networks and highlights the most suitable applications cases for each technology on the basis of the tested metrics.

Inspec keywords: wide area networks; Internet of Things

Other keywords: low data rate transmissions; LPWAN technology; IoT-applications; high scalability; IoT communications; internet of things low-power wide-area networks; smart metering; next-generation low-power communication technology; asset tracking; communication networks; low power consumption; remote monitoring; NB-IoT

Subjects: Computer communications; Other computer networks

References

    1. 1)
      • 11. The Things Network, ‘Network architecture’. Available at: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/docs/network/architecture.html, accessed 8 September 2018.
    2. 2)
      • 14. ‘LTE eDRX and PSM Explained for LTE-M1 - Link Labs’. Available at: https://www.link-labs.com/blog/lte-e-drx-psm-explained-for-lte-m1, accessed 12 June 2018.
    3. 3)
      • 16. Microchip: ‘RN2483 LoRa Technology Transceiver Module Data Sheet’ (DS50002346C, 2015-2017).
    4. 4)
      • 10. Sigfox, ‘Make things come alive in a secure way’. Available at: https://www.sigfox.com/sites/default/files/1701-SIGFOX-White_Paper_Security.pdf, accessed 10 February 2018.
    5. 5)
      • 22. armEMBED, 'Firmware updates over LoRaWAN'. Available at: https://www.mbed.com/en/fota-lora/, accessed 12 March 2019.
    6. 6)
      • 20. Adelantado, F., Vilajosana, X., Tuset-Peiro, P., et al: ‘Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2017, 55, (9), pp. 34–40.
    7. 7)
      • 13. Vodacom and Vodafone, ‘White paper: Narrowband-IoT: pushing the boundaries of IoT systems’. Available at: https://www.vodacombusiness.co.za/cs/groups/public/documents/document/vodafone_nbiot_white_paper_fi.pdf, accessed 16 September 2018.
    8. 8)
      • 4. Hamzei, M., Jafari Navimipour, N.: ‘Toward efficient service composition techniques in the internet of things’, IEEE Intern. Things J., 2018, 5, (5), pp. 3774–3787.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Sigfox, ‘Sigfox technical overview’. Available at: https://www.disk91.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/4967675830228422064.pdf, accessed 8 September 2018.
    10. 10)
      • 1. ‘IoT Market Outlook - Ericson’. Available at: www.ericsson.com/en/networks/trending/hot-topics/iot-connectivity/iot-market-outlook, accessed 18 September 2018.
    11. 11)
      • 17. UBlox: ‘SARA-N2 Power-optimized NB-IoT (LTE Cat NB1) modules Data Sheet’ (UBX-15025564, 16th edn. 2018).
    12. 12)
      • 18. UBlox: ‘LEON-G1 series quad-band GSM/GPRS data & voice modules Data Sheet’ (UBX-13004887, 3rd edn. 2018).
    13. 13)
      • 8. Mekki, K., Bajic, E., Chaxel, F., et al: ‘A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment’, ICT Express, 2019, 5, (1), pp. 1–7.
    14. 14)
      • 21. Bor, M.C., Roedig, U., Voigt, T., et al: ‘Do loRa low-Power wide-Area networks scale?’. Proc. 19th ACM Int. Conf. on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, Malta, 2016.
    15. 15)
      • 2. Centenaro, M., Vangelista, L., Zanella, A., et al: ‘Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios’, IEEE Wirel. Commun., 2016, 23, (5), pp. 60–67.
    16. 16)
      • 15. ‘Wisol SIGFOX SUPPORT - Product Information’. Available at: http://support.wisol.co.kr/en/, accessed 17 September 2018.
    17. 17)
      • 19. Sinha, R.S., Wei, Y., Hwang, S.: ‘A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT’, ICT Express, 2017, 3, (1), pp. 14–21.
    18. 18)
      • 7. Finnegan, J., Brown, S.: ‘A Comparative Survey of LPWA Networking’, arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04222v1, 2018.
    19. 19)
      • 6. Elkhodr, M., Shahrestani, S.A.: ‘Emerging wireless technologies in the internet of things: a comparative study’, Int. J. Wirel. & Mobile Netw., 2016, 8, (5), pp. 67–82.
    20. 20)
      • 5. Raza, U., Kulkarni, P., Sooriyabandara, M.: ‘Low power wide area networks: an overview’, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 2017, 19, (2), pp. 855–873.
    21. 21)
      • 12. UBlox, ‘IoT and the four reasons why licensed spectrum technologies have been worth the wait’. Available at: https://www.u-blox.com/en/iot-and-four-reasons-why-licensed-spectrum-technologies-have-been-worth-wait, accessed 17 August 2018.
    22. 22)
      • 3. Pourghebleh, B., Jafari Navimipour, N.: ‘Data aggregation mechanisms in the Internet of things: a systematic review of the literature and recommendations for future research’, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 2017, 97, pp. 23–34.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2019.0168
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2019.0168
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address