Your browser does not support JavaScript!

access icon free Multicast scheduling for delay-energy trade-off under bursty request arrivals in cellular networks

In this study, the authors consider the utilisation of multicast technology in cellular networks given different arrival patterns for the content requests of mobile users. Traditionally, the performance evaluation of multicast in the literature usually depends on the adoption of temporal Poisson processes for content requests, which is not accurate any more according to many real data measurements. Therefore, to make use of the bursty nature of content requests, they propose a hybrid unicast/multicast strategy where the base station (BS) can perform the unicast or multicast procedure according to its serving status. By modelling the complete process into a circular Markov chain, they derive the average latency of content requests and the average power consumption of BSs under different arrival patterns and serving configurations in theoretical and/or simulative ways. Moreover, the multicast threshold introduced in their strategy can be dynamically adjusted to achieve a joint optimisation between average latency and power consumption when confronted with varied demands. Numerous results show that the proposed strategy can not only reduce the average latency of content requests but also decrease the average power consumption of BSs, especially under the bursty request arrival patterns.


    1. 1)
      • 8. Cui, Y., Jiang, D.: ‘Analysis and optimization of caching and multicasting in large-scale cache-enabled heterogeneous wireless networks’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2017, 16, (1), pp. 250264.
    2. 2)
      • 13. Taleb, T., Ksentini, A., Chen, M., et al: ‘Coping with emerging mobile social media applications through dynamic service function chaining’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2016, 15, (4), pp. 28592871.
    3. 3)
      • 5. Militano, L., Condoluci, M., Araniti, G., et al: ‘Single frequency-based device-to-device enhanced video delivery for evolved multimedia broadcast and multicast services’, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., 2015, 62, (2), pp. 263278.
    4. 4)
      • 9. Su, C.-J., Tassiulas, L.: ‘Joint broadcast scheduling and user's cache management for efficient information delivery’, Wirel. Netw., 2000, 6, (4), pp. 279288.
    5. 5)
      • 4. Huang, C., Zhang, J., Poor, H.V., et al: ‘Delay-energy tradeoff in multicast scheduling for green cellular systems’, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2016, 34, (5), pp. 12351249.
    6. 6)
      • 1. Cisco visual network index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2015–2020 white paper', 2016. Available at
    7. 7)
      • 12. Ross, S.M.: ‘Introduction to probability models’ (Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 2014).
    8. 8)
      • 10. Poularakis, K., Iosifidis, G., Sourlas, V., et al: ‘Exploiting caching and multicast for 5G wireless networks’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2016, 15, (4), pp. 29953007.
    9. 9)
      • 7. Zhou, B., Cui, Y., Tao, M., et al: ‘Optimal dynamic multicast scheduling for cache-enabled content-centric wireless networks’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2017, 65, (7), pp. 29562970.
    10. 10)
      • 2. Araniti, G., Condoluci, M., Scopelliti, P., et al: ‘Multicasting over emerging 5G networks: challenges and perspectives’, IEEE Netw., 2017, 31, (2), pp. 8089.
    11. 11)
      • 3. Hartung, F., Horn, U., Huschke, J., et al: ‘MBMS IP multicast/broadcast in 3G networks’, Int. J. Digit. Multimedia Broadcast., 2009, 1, pp. 125.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Li, R., Zhao, Z., Qi, C., et al: ‘Understanding the traffic nature of mobile instantaneous messaging in cellular networks: a revisiting to α-stable models’, IEEE Access, 2015, 3, pp. 14161422.
    13. 13)
      • 6. Tassi, A., Chatzigeorgiou, I., Vukobratovic, D.: ‘Resource allocation frameworks for network-coded layered multimedia multicast services’, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2015, 33, (2), pp. 141155.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address