Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Reweighted l p constraint LMS-based adaptive sparse channel estimation for cooperative communication system

The issue of sparsity adaptive channel reconstruction in time-varying cooperative communication networks through the amplify-and-forward transmission scheme is studied. A new sparsity adaptive system identification method is proposed, namely reweighted norm () penalised least mean square (LMS) algorithm. The main idea of the algorithm is to add a norm penalty of sparsity into the cost function of the LMS algorithm. By doing so, the weight factor becomes a balance parameter of the associated norm adaptive sparse system identification. Subsequently, the steady state of the coefficient misalignment vector is derived theoretically, with a performance upper bounds provided which serve as a sufficient condition for the LMS channel estimation of the precise reweighted norm. With the upper bounds, the authors prove that the () norm sparsity inducing cost function is superior to the reweighted norm. An optimal selection of p for the norm problem is studied to recover various d sparse channel vectors. Several experiments verify that the simulation results agree well with the theoretical analysis, and thus demonstrate that the proposed algorithm has a better convergence speed and better steady-state behaviour than other LMS algorithms.

References

    1. 1)
      • 7. Tropp, J.A.: ‘Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2004, 50, (10), pp. 22312242.
    2. 2)
      • 5. Jian, J., Gu, Y., Mei, S.: ‘Adaptive algorithm for sparse system identification: zero-attracting LMS’, J. Tsinghua Univ., 2010, 50, (10), pp. 16561659.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Zhang, A., Yang, S., Li, J., et al: ‘Sparsity adaptive expectation maximization algorithm for estimating channels in MIMO cooperation systems’, KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst., 2016, 10, (8), pp. 34983511.
    4. 4)
      • 10. Jin, J., Gu, Y., Mei, S.: ‘New adaptive algorithm for sparse system identification: zero-attracting LMS’, J. Tsinghua Univ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 50, (9), pp. 13121315.
    5. 5)
      • 14. Hong, X., Gao, J., Chen, S.: ‘Zero-attracting recursive least squares algorithms’, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2017, 66, (1), pp. 213221.
    6. 6)
      • 17. Aliyu, M.L., Alkassim, M.A., Salman, M.S.: ‘A p norm variable step-size LMS algorithm for sparse system identification’, Signal Image Video Process., 2015, 9, (7), pp. 15591565.
    7. 7)
      • 8. Tropp, J.A., Gilbert, A.C.: ‘Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2007, 53, (12), pp. 46554666.
    8. 8)
      • 12. Taheri, O., Vorobyov, S.A.: ‘Reweighted l1 norm penalized LMS for sparse channel estimation and its analysis’, Signal Process., 2014, 104, (6), pp. 7079.
    9. 9)
      • 11. Chen, Y., Gu, Y., Hero, A.O.: ‘Sparse LMS for system identification’. IEEE ICASSP, Taiwan, April 2009, pp. 31253128.
    10. 10)
      • 9. Blumensath, T., Davies, M.E.: ‘Normalized iterative hard thresholding: guaranteed stability and performance’, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., 2010, 4, (2), pp. 298309.
    11. 11)
      • 18. Chen, L., Gu, Y.: ‘Local and global optimality of LP-minimization for sparse recovery’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), South Brisbane, August 2015, pp. 35963600.
    12. 12)
      • 13. Su, G., Jin, J., Gu, Y., et al: ‘Performance analysis of 0 norm constraint least mean square algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2012, 60, (5), pp. 22232235.
    13. 13)
      • 4. Widrow, B., Stearns, S.D.: ‘Adaptive signal processing’ (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1985).
    14. 14)
      • 15. Selesnick, I.: ‘Sparse regularization via convex analysis’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2017, 65, (17), pp. 44814494.
    15. 15)
      • 6. Candes, E.J., Wakin, M.B., Boyd, S.P.: ‘Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l1 minimization’, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 2008, 14, (5), pp. 877905.
    16. 16)
      • 2. Zhang, A., Yang, S., Gui, G.: ‘Sparse channel estimation for MIMO-OFDM two-way relay network with compressed sensing’, Int. J. Antennas. Propag., 2013, 2013, (8), pp. 7281.
    17. 17)
      • 16. Shen, X., Gu, Y.: ‘Nonconvex sparse logistic regression with weakly convex regularization’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2018, 66, (12), pp. 31993211.
    18. 18)
      • 1. Laneman, J.N., Tse, D.N.C., Wornell, G.W.: ‘Cooper-ative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behavior’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2004, 50, (12), pp. 30623080.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2018.6186
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2018.6186
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address