Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Improper Gaussian signaling scheme for the two-users X-interference channel

Different from conventional proper Gaussian signalling (PGS), whose achievable rate depends on the input signals' covariances only, the capacity of channels with improper Gaussian signalling (IGS) is a function with the signals' covariances and pseudo-covariances. Thus, the additional degree of freedom provided by pseudo-covariance is available to improve the achievable rate. In this study, the authors investigate the achievable rate region of two-users X-interference channel (IC) in the condition of applying IGS. By treating the interference as additive Gaussian noise, the authors analyze the mathematical expression of capacity based on Shannon's theorem. Specifically, for the two-users simple input, simple output (SISO)-IC, they propose two optimal signalling schemes to achieve the Pareto boundary in situations of employing PGS and IGS, respectively. In these optimal signalling schemes, the transparent geometric model which takes less computational complexity is applied to calculate the optimal transmission parameters for the Pareto boundary. Numerical simulation results show that the proposed IGS strategies can achieve larger achievable rate region and a greater sum rate. Finally, the authors give an in-depth discussion about the structure of the Pareto boundary, which is characterised by the degree of impropriety measured by the covariance and the pseudo-covariance of signals.

References

    1. 1)
      • 12. Lagen, S., Agustin, A., Vidal, J.: ‘On the superiority of improper Gaussian signaling in wireless interference MIMO scenarios’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2016, 64, (8), pp. 33503368.
    2. 2)
      • 6. Charafeddine, M., Sezgin, A., Paulraj, A.: ‘Rate region frontiers for n-user interference channel with interference as noise’, Mathematics, 2010, 9, pp. 2628.
    3. 3)
      • 18. Zeng, Y., Yetis, C.M., Gunawan, E., et al: ‘Transmit optimization with improper Gaussian signaling for interference channels’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2013, 61, (11), pp. 28992913.
    4. 4)
      • 14. Park, S.H., Park, H., Lee, I.: ‘Coordinated SINR balancing techniques for multi-cell downlink transmission’. Proc. Vehicular Technology Conference 2010-fall, Ottowa, Canada, 2010.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Shang, X., Chen, B., Poor, H.V.: ‘Multiuser MISO interference channels with single-user detection: optimality of beamforming and the achievable rate region’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2011, 57, (7), pp. 42554273.
    6. 6)
      • 2. Etkin, R.H., Tse, D.N.C., Wang, H.: ‘Gaussian interference channel capacity to within one bit’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2008, 54, (12), pp. 55345562.
    7. 7)
      • 16. Zeng, Y., Zhang, R., Gunawan, E., et al: ‘Optimized transmission with improper Gaussian signaling in the K-user MISO interference channel’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2013, 12, (12), pp. 63036313.
    8. 8)
      • 13. Soleymani, M., Lameiro, C., Santamaria, I., et al: ‘Robust improper signaling for two-user SISO interference channels’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2019, doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2910549 (Early access).
    9. 9)
      • 17. Lameiro, C., Santamaria, I., Schreier, P.J.: ‘Rate region boundary of the (SISO) Z-interference channel with improper signaling’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2017, 65, (3), pp. 10221034.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Taubock, G.: ‘Complex-valued random vectors and channels: entropy, divergence and capacity’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2012, 58, (5), pp. 27292744.
    11. 11)
      • 7. Neeser, F.D., Massey, J.L.: ‘Proper complex random processes with applications to information theory’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1993, 39, (4), pp. 12931302.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Li, D., Wang, S., Gu, F.-L.: ‘Optimal signaling design strategy with improper Gaussian signaling in the Z-interference channel’, Front. Inf. Tech. Electron. Eng., 2017, 18, (11), pp. 19001912.
    13. 13)
      • 8. Hellings, C., Joham, M., Utschick, W.: ‘QoS feasibility in MIMO broadcast channels with widely linear transceivers’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. Lett., 2013, 20, (11), pp. 11341137.
    14. 14)
      • 3. Ye, S., Blum, R.S.: ‘Optimized signaling for MIMO interference systems with feedback’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2003, 51, (11), pp. 28392848.
    15. 15)
      • 1. Han, T.S., Kobayashi, K.: ‘A new achievable rate region for the interference channel’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1981, 27, (1), pp. 4960.
    16. 16)
      • 9. Cadambe, V.R., Jafar, S.A., Wang, C.: ‘Interference alignment and degrees of freedom of the k-user interference channel’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2008, 54, (8), pp. 34253441.
    17. 17)
      • 4. Zhang, R., Cui, S.: ‘Cooperative interference management with MISO beamforming’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2010, 58, (10), pp. 54505458.
    18. 18)
      • 15. Ho, Z.K.M., Jorswieck, E.: ‘Improper Gaussian signaling on the two-user SISO interference channel’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2012, 11, (9), pp. 31943203.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5296
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5296
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address