access icon free Low-overhead constant envelope precoding in multi-cell massive MIMO systems with pilot contamination

The authors consider downlink transmission in a multi-cell massive multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) system and focus on decreasing the feedback overhead caused by cell cooperation in constant envelope precoding (CEP). In the literature, the single-cell case for CEP with perfect channel state information (CSI) has been studied. Here, considering full cooperation among the cells, they develop CEP for the multi-cell case. They devise a low overhead centralised construction for CEP which employs limited cooperation among the cells, providing higher system throughput. To achieve the minimum feedback overhead, a distributed realisation of CEP is proposed where each cell locally performs CEP. Furthermore, a new optimisation problem is solved to compensate for the effects of pilot contamination. In addition, to reduce the computational complexity, a relaxed iterative form is presented for the limited cooperation and the distributed scenarios. Numerical results show that in the proposed structures, despite a tremendous decrease in the system overhead, the performance confronts merely an insignificant degradation, <10%, compared to the full-cooperation case. Moreover, in the presence of imperfect CSI, the performance of the distributed structure whose imperfect CSI is compensated for, approaches the performance of this structure in the perfect CSI scenario.

Inspec keywords: MIMO communication; cellular radio; antenna arrays; iterative methods; channel estimation; precoding

Other keywords: multicell massive MIMO systems; low-overhead constant envelope; full-cooperation case; low overhead centralised construction; single-cell case; higher system throughput; minimum feedback overhead; perfect channel state information; multiple-output; pilot contamination; CEP; system overhead; multicell case; cell cooperation; multicell massive multiple-input

Subjects: Communication channel equalisation and identification; Codes; Antenna arrays; Other topics in statistics; Radio links and equipment; Interpolation and function approximation (numerical analysis); Mobile radio systems

References

    1. 1)
      • 2. Rusek, F., Persson, D., Lau, B.K., et al: ‘Scaling up MIMO: opportunities and challenges with very large arrays’, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 2013, 30, (1), pp. 4060.
    2. 2)
      • 17. 3GPP TR 25.996 V10.0.0: ‘3rd generation partnership project; technical specification group radio access network; spatial channel model for MIMO simulations (release 10)’, April 2010.
    3. 3)
      • 5. Shirazinia, A., et al: ‘Massive MIMO for decentralized estimation of a correlated source’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2016, 64, (10), pp. 24992512.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Ciuonzo, D., Rossi, P.S., Dey, S., et al: ‘Massive MIMO channel-aware decision fusion’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2015, 63, (3), pp. 604619.
    5. 5)
      • 8. Mohammed, S.K., Larsson, E.G.: ‘Per-antenna constant envelope precoding for large multi-user MIMO systems’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2013, 61, (3), pp. 10591071.
    6. 6)
      • 10. Chen, J.-C., Wen, C.-K., Wong, K.-K.: ‘Improved constant envelope multiuser precoding for massive MIMO systems’, IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., 2014, 18, (8), pp. 13111314.
    7. 7)
      • 3. Marzetta, T.L.: ‘Massive MIMO: an introduction’, Bell Labs Tech. J., 2015, 20, pp. 1122.
    8. 8)
      • 13. Amadori, P.V., Masouros, C.: ‘Constant envelope precoding by interference exploitation in phase shift keying-modulated multiuser transmission’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2017, 16, (1), pp. 538550.
    9. 9)
      • 11. Mukherjee, S., Mohammed, S.K.: ‘Constant-envelope precoding with time-variation constraint on the transmitted phase angles’, IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., 2015, 4, (2), pp. 221224.
    10. 10)
      • 15. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Raszczynski, A.: ‘Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory’ (SIAM, USA, 2009).
    11. 11)
      • 16. Kay, S.M.: ‘Fundamentals of statistical signal processing. I: estimation theory’ (Prentice-Hall PTR, USA, 1993).
    12. 12)
      • 18. Hoydis, J., ten Brink, S., Debbah, M.: ‘Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of cellular networks: how many antennas do we need?’, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2013, 31, (2), pp. 160171.
    13. 13)
      • 19. Ngo, H., Larsson, E., Marzetta, T.: ‘The multicell multiuser MIMO uplink with very large antenna arrays and a finite-dimensional channel’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2013, 61, (6), pp. 23502361.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Liu, F., Masouros, C., Amadori, P.V., et al: ‘An efficient manifold algorithm for constructive interference based constant envelope precoding’, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 2017, 24, (10), pp. 15421546.
    15. 15)
      • 7. Ciuonzo, D., Rossi, P.S., Dey, S., et al: ‘Massive MIMO meets decision fusion: decode-and-fuse vs. Decode-then-fuse’. 2014 IEEE 8th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), A Coruna, Spain, 2014.
    16. 16)
      • 6. Jiang, F., Chen, J., Swindlehurst, A.L., et al: ‘Massive MIMO for wireless sensing with a coherent multiple access channel’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2015, 63, (12), pp. 30053017.
    17. 17)
      • 1. Marzetta, T.L.: ‘Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2010, 9, (11), pp. 35903600.
    18. 18)
      • 9. Mohammed, S.K., Larsson, E.G.: ‘Single-user beamforming in large-scale MISO systems with per-antenna constant-envelope constraints: the doughnut channel’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2012, 11, (11), pp. 39924005.
    19. 19)
      • 12. Kazemi, M., Aghaeinia, H., Duman, T.M.: ‘Discrete-phase constant envelope precoding for massive MIMO systems’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2017, 65, (5), pp. 20112021.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5196
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5196
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading