2D curtailed harmonic memory polynomial for reduced complexity in concurrent dual-band modelling and digital predistortion with the second band at harmonic frequency

2D curtailed harmonic memory polynomial for reduced complexity in concurrent dual-band modelling and digital predistortion with the second band at harmonic frequency

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Multi-band transmitter systems are evolving to support the smooth transition from 4G to 5G communication systems. Moreover, recent developments of multi-band and ultra-wideband power amplifiers have led to a possible scenario where the second carrier signal is transmitted at the harmonic frequency of the first carrier signal. This results in harmonic interference from the first carrier signal as well as additional cross-modulation and intermodulation distortion (IMD) components, which cannot be filtered out. The computational and memory requirements for digital predistortion (DPD) in such scenario increase drastically to include all interference terms. This study presents a novel two-dimensional curtailed harmonic memory polynomial (2D-CHMP) model to capture harmonic interferences, cross-modulation and IMDs. The model complexity and memory requirement of 2D-CHMP are very less as compared to the state-of-the-art two-dimensional harmonic memory polynomial (2D-HMP) model. For proof-of-concept, it is shown with two different measurement setups that the proposed 2D-CHMP DPD provides similar linearisation performances as compared to the 2D-HMP DPD with less number of coefficients and computational complexity. As a study, it is shown that the proposed model can be further adapted to a low-precision (low-bit) environment by utilising principal component analysis.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Alexiou, A.: ‘The road to 5G – visions and challenges’, in Alexiou, A. (Ed.): ‘5G Wireless Technologies' (The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2017), pp. 115, ch. 1.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Nordrum, A.: ‘5 myths about 5G’. IEEE Spectrum, May 2016.
    3. 3)
      • 3. 3GPP RP-091440: ‘Work Item Description: Carrier Aggregation for LTE’. Nokia Corporation, Sanya, P.R. China, December 2009.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Yousefi, A., Medi, A.: ‘Wide-band high-efficiency ku-band power amplifier’, IET Circuits Device Syst., 2014, 8, (6), pp. 583592.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Rawat, K., Ghannouchi, F.: ‘Dual-band matching technique based on dual characteristic impedance transformers for dual-band power amplifiers design’, IET Microw. Antennas Propag., 2011, 5, (14), pp. 17201729.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Ding, L., Zhou, G.T., Morgan, D.R., et al: ‘A robust digital baseband predistorter constructed using memory polynomials’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2004, 52, (1), pp. 159165.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Ai, B., Zhong, Z.D., Zhu, G., et al: ‘Two-dimensional indexing polynomial-based pre-distorter for power amplifiers with memory effects’, IET Commun., 2008, 2, (10), pp. 12631271.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Ghannouchi, F.M., Taringou, F., Kwan, A., et al: ‘Identification of true-static predistorter using a sine wave and accurate quantification of memory effects in broadband wireless transmitters’, IET Commun., 2011, 5, (9), pp. 12681274.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Zeleny, J., Dehos, C., Rosson, P., et al: ‘Receiver-aided predistortion of power amplifier non-linearities in cellular networks’, IET Sci. Measure. Technol., 2012, 6, (3), pp. 168175.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Varahram, P., Ali, B.M., Mohammady, S., et al: ‘Power amplifier linearization scheme to mitigate superfluous radiations and suppress adjacent channel interference’, IET Commun., 2014, 8, (2), pp. 258265.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Zhang, C., Xiao, Z., Gao, B., et al: ‘Power amplifier non-linearity treatment with distorted constellation estimation and demodulation for 60 GHz single-carrier frequency-domain equalisation transmission’, IET Commun., 2014, 8, (3), pp. 278286.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Younes, M., Ghannouchi, F.M.: ‘Generalized twin-box model for compensation of transmitters RF impairments’, IET Commun., 2014, 8, (4), pp. 413418.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Zenteno, E., Piazza, R., Shankar, M.R.B., et al: ‘Multiple-input multiple-output symbol rate signal digital predistorter for non-linear multi-carrier satellite channels’, IET Commun., 2015, 9, (16), pp. 20532059.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Bassam, S.A., Helaoui, M., Ghannouchi, F.M.: ‘2-D digital predistortion (2-D-DPD) architecture for concurrent dual-band transmitters’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2011, 59, (10), pp. 25472553.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Liu, Y.J., Chen, W., Zhou, J., et al: ‘Digital predistortion for concurrent dual-band transmitters using 2-D modified memory polynomials’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2013, 61, (1), pp. 281290.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Rawat, M., Narharishetti, N., Quindroit, C., et al: ‘Concurrent Dual-band transmitter behavioral modeling with physically motivated 2-D rational functions’. 82nd ARFTG Microw. Meas. Symp., Columbus, OH, USA, November 2013, pp. 14.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Ding, L., Yang, Z., Gandhi, H.: ‘Concurrent dual-band digital predistortion’. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, Montreal, QC, Canada, June 2012, pp. 13.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Naraharisetti, N., Roblin, P., Quindroit, C., et al: ‘Efficient least-squares 2-D-cubic spline for concurrent dual-band systems’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2015, 63, (7), pp. 21992210.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Omer, M., Rimini, R., Draxler, P., et al: ‘Interference cancellation for odd harmonics of envelope tracking RF power amplifier systems’. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, Seattle, WA, USA, June 2013, pp. 13.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Rawat, M., Roblin, P., Quindroit, C., et al: ‘Concurrent Dual-band modeling and digital predistortion in the presence of unfilterable harmonic signal interference’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2015, 63, (2), pp. 625637.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Gilabert, P.L., Montoro, G., López, D., et al: ‘Order reduction of wideband digital predistorters using principal component analysis’. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, Seattle, WA, USA, June 2013, pp. 17.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Gilabert, P.L., Montoro, G.: ‘3-D Distributed memory polynomial behavioral model for concurrent dual-band envelope tracking power amplifier linearization’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2015, 63, (2), pp. 638648.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Quindroit, C., Naraharisetti, N., Roblin, P., et al: ‘FPGA implementation of orthogonal 2D digital predistortion system for concurrent dual-band power amplifiers based on time-division multiplexing’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2013, 61, (12), pp. 45914599.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Jaraut, P., Rawat, M.: ‘Application of principal component analysis based effective digital predistortion technique for low-cost FPGA implementation’, Int. J. RF Microw. Comput., Aided Eng., 2017, 27, (6), pp. 115.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Jaraut, P., Rawat, M.: ‘Complexity and numerical stability investigation in concurrent dual-band modeling of ultra-wideband power amplifiers for harmonically related signals’. Proc. IEEE MTT-S Asia-Pacific Microwave Conf., New Delhi, India, December 2016, pp. 14.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Landin, P.N., Isaksson, M., Handel, P.: ‘Comparison of evaluation criteria for power amplifier behavioral modeling’. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, Atlanta, GA, June 2008, pp. 14411444.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Rawat, M., Ghannouchi, F.M., Rawat, K.: ‘Three-layered biased memory polynomial for dynamic modeling and predistortion of transmitters with memory’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Regul. Pap., 2013, 60, (3), pp. 768777.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Dawar, N., Sharma, T., Darraji, R., et al: ‘Linearisation of radio frequency power amplifiers exhibiting memory effects using direct learning-based adaptive digital predistoriton’, IET Commun., 2016, 10, (8), pp. 950954.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Beikmirza, M.R., Mohammadi, A., Mirzavand, R.: ‘Power amplifier linearisation using digital predistortion and multi-port techniques’, IET Sci. Measure. Technol., 2016, 10, (5), pp. 467476.
    30. 30)
      • 30. 3GPP R4-120442: ‘Way forward for inter-band CA Class A2’. Nokia Corporation, Dresden, Germany, February 2012.
    31. 31)
      • 31. 3GPP R4-123845: ‘Feasibility study of harmonic spurious emission from B28 in Japan’. NTT DOCOMO, Sharp, NEC, Qingdao, P.R. China, August 2012.
    32. 32)
      • 32. Lipschutz, S.: ‘Arrays, records and pointers’ in data structures, Revised 1st edn., Schaum's outline series' (McGraw-Hill Education, India, 2013), ch. 4, sec. 4.8, pp. 4.154.18.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address