Fast two-stage spectrum detector for cognitive radios in uncertain noise channels

Fast two-stage spectrum detector for cognitive radios in uncertain noise channels

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

An enormous influx of wireless services and devices coupled with inefficient usage of electromagnetic spectrum has led to an apparent scarcity of usable radio bandwidth. Cognitive radio is leading the trend for increasing the spectrum efficiency by utilising the vacancy in the radio spectrum created by absence of the licensed primary user. This paradigm shift can only take place if the means to detect the primary user are well established so that an ecosystem can be created where both primary and secondary users can co-exist without interfering with each other. In this study the authors propose a two-stage detection mechanism which gives an improved performance over conventional single-stage detectors yet optimises the usage of the second stage, thereby reducing the sensing time as compared to conventional two-stage spectrum sensing algorithms. A hardware implementation of the algorithm has also been done to quantify the area and power consumption values. By utilising the second-stage optimally, the algorithm presented in this study helps in reducing the sensing time by 86% as compared with the conventional two-stage detector. By not activating the second stage at high SNRs, the proposed algorithm saves 0.915 W of dynamic power out of a total of 1.09 W, thus effectively reducing the dynamic power consumption by 84%.


    1. 1)
      • Federal Communications Commission: ‘Spectrum policy task force report’, November 2002.
    2. 2)
      • Islam, M.H., Koh, C.L., Oh, S.W.: `Spectrum survey in Singapore: occupancy measurements and analysis', Proc. Third Int. Conf. on CROWNCOM, May 2008, Singapore, p. 1–7.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Zahedi-Ghasabeh, A., Tarighat, A., Daneshrad, B.: `Spectrum sensing of OFDM waveforms using embedded pilot subcarriers', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communication, May 2010, Cape Town, p. 1–6.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • Maleki, S., Pandharipande, A., Leus, G.: `Two-stage spectrum sensing for cognitive radios', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, March 2010, Texas, p. 2946–2949.
    9. 9)
      • Li, Z., Wang, H., Kuang, J.: `A two-step spectrum sensing scheme for cognitive radio networks', Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Science and Technology, 2011, Nanjing, China, p. 694–698.
    10. 10)
      • Nair, P., Vinod, A.P., Krishna, A.K.: `A fast two-stage detector for spectrum sensing in cognitive radios', Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf., 1–5 September 2011, San Francisco, p. 1–5.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • Schunur, S.R.: `Identification and classification of OFDM based signals using preamble correlation and cyclostationary feature extraction', 2009, Master, , Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • Bhargavi, D., Murthy, C.R.: `Performance comparison of energy, matched-filter and cyclostationarity-based spectrum sensing', Proc. IEEE 11th Int. Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, 2010, Marrakech, p. 1–5.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Fazeli-Dehkordy, S., Konstantinos, N.P., Pasupathy, S.: `Two-stage spectrum detection in cognitive radio networks', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, March 2010, Texas, USA, p. 3118–3121.
    20. 20)
      • Zeng, Y., Koh, C.L., Liang, Y.C.: `Maximum eigenvalue detection: theory and application', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC), May 2008, Beijing, p. 4160–4164.
    21. 21)
      • Zhang, Q., Kokkeler, A.B.J., Smit, G.J.M.: `An efficient multi-resolution spectrum sensing method for cognitive radio', Third Int. Conf. on Communications and Networking in Hangzhou, August 2008, China, p. 1226–1229.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • Maeda, K., Benjebbour, A., Asai, T.: `Recognition among OFDM based sytems utilizing cyclostationary inducing transmission', Proc. Second IEEE Int. Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2007, Dublin, Ireland, p. 516–523.
    24. 24)
      • Sohn, S.H., Han, N.K., Jae, M.: `OFDM signal sensing method based on cyclostationary detection', Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications, 2007, Orlando, p. 63–68.
    25. 25)
      • Peh, E.C., Liang, Y.C.: `Optimization for cooperative sensing in cognitive radio networks', Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf., 2007, Kowloon, p. 27–32.
    26. 26)
      • Zhou, Y., Tian, F.: `A spectrum sensing algorithm based on random matrix theory in cognitive radio networks', Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Wireless Communication Systems, 2010, p. 971–975.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address