Max–min relay selection in bidirectional cooperative networks with imperfect channel estimation

Max–min relay selection in bidirectional cooperative networks with imperfect channel estimation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors study the performance of wireless bidirectional relay-assisted networks in the presence of imperfect channel state information, where two end-source terminals S1 and S2 communicate with the assistance of M relay terminals Rj's. The max–min relay selection criterion is used to select the best relay that maximises the minimum signal-to-noise ratio of the links S1RjS2 and S2RjS1 over all relay terminals. The authors investigate the impact of imperfect channel estimation on the outage probability Pout of the system by means of the correlation coefficient pSi of the estimated channel gains and their actual values. Furthermore, the authors show that in a bidirectional relay-assisted network neither of the links S1RjS2 and S2RjS1 dominates the performance of the system. Instead, the performance is determined by the average performance of the two links, based on that the authors then discuss the power allocation in such networks. The authors demonstrate that in order to minimise Pout of the entire system, increasing the transmission power of the link with better estimation cannot compensate for the effect of the worse link and therefore the optimum power allocation with the least complexity is to transmit at each source terminals S1 and S2 with equal powers. Numerical results are also presented to corroborate the analytical expressions.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Larsson, P., Johansson, N., Sunell, K.E.: `Coded bi-directional relaying', Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC06-Spring), May 2006, Australia, p. 851–855.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Hwang, K.S., Ko, Y.C., Alouini, M.-S.: `Performance bounds for two-way amplify-and-forward relaying based on relay path selection', Proc. IEEE VTC, April 2009, p. 1–5.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • H. Cui , R. Zhang , L. Song , B. Jiao . Performance analysis of bidirectional relay selection with imperfect channel state information.
    13. 13)
      • Janzamin, M., Pakravan, M.R., Sedghi, H.: `A game-theoretic approach for power allocation in bidirectional cooperative communication', Proc. IEEE WCNC, April 2010, p. 1–6.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • W.C. Jakes . (1994) Microwave mobile communications.
    18. 18)
      • Ju, M., Kim, I.-M.: `Relay selection with analog network coding in bidirectional networks', 25thBiennial Symp. on Communications (QBSC), May 2010, p. 293–296.
    19. 19)
      • M. Abramowitz , I.A. Stegun . (1964) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables.
    20. 20)
      • I.S. Gradshteyn , I.M. Ryzhik . (1994) Table of integrals, series, and products.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address