Unveiling popularity of BitTorrent Darknets

Unveiling popularity of BitTorrent Darknets

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

BitTorrent is todays most influential peer-to-peer content distribution system. Currently BitTorrent has two very different operating models: (i) public trackers, and (ii) private trackers (a.k.a. PTs, Darknets). A PT can only be accessed by its registered users, and can provide ultrahigh downloading speed because of its effective share-ratio enforcement (SRE) incentive mechanism which stimulates the users to upload contents as much as possible. Although PTs are becoming more and more popular, they receive little attention from the research literature, possibly because they are operated underground. To understand the popularity of Darknets, the authors have traced 17 PT sites, 2 public tracker sites and 1 BitTorrent search engine for over a year. The authors investigate these PT sites from several aspects and try to understand why they are so successful in terms of attracting loyal users and providing high downloading speed. The authors then analyse the SRE mechanism and ratio free system which are commonly used by PTs. Our results unveil the reason of popularity and effectiveness of PTs. These understandings are essential to the sustainable development of future BitTorrent content distribution systems.


    1. 1)
      • `Internet Study 2008–2009', IPOQUE Report, , Available at:, accessed February 2011.
    2. 2)
      • Zhang, C., Dhungel, P., Wu, D., Liu, Z., Ross, K.W.: `BitTorrent Darknets', Proc. IEEE Infocom, March 2010, San Diego, CA.
    3. 3)
      • Chen, X., Jiang, Y., Chu, X.-W.: `Measurements, analysis and modeling of private trackers', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P’10), August 2010, Delft, Netherlands.
    4. 4)
      • ‘FatalTracker – Oldest private BitTorrent tracker?’, accessed February 2011.
    5. 5)
      • ‘Trackers List’,, accessed February 2011.
    6. 6)
      • ‘Alexa’,, accessed February 2011.
    7. 7)
      • Cuevas, R., Kryczka, M., Cuevas, A.: `Is content publishing in bittorrent altruistic or profit-driven?', Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT’10), December 2010, Philadelphia, USA.
    8. 8)
      • A. Maslow . (1954) Motivation and personality.
    9. 9)
      • Chen, X., Chu, X.-W.: `Understanding private trackers in Bittorrent systems', Technical Report, July 2010,
    10. 10)
      • Pouwelse, J.A., Garbacki, P., Epema, D.H.J., Sips, H.J.: `The Bittorrent P2P fle-sharing system: measurements and analysis', Proc. Int. Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS’05), February 2005, New York.
    11. 11)
      • Menasche, D.S., Rocha, A.A.A., Li, B., Towsley, D., Venkataramani, A.: `Content availability and bundling in swarming systems', Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT’09), December 2009, Rome, Italy.
    12. 12)
      • Siganos, G., Pujol, J., Rodriguez, P.: `Monitoring the Bittorrent monitors: a bird's eye view', Proc. 10th Passive and Active Measurement Conf. (PAM’09), April 2009, Seoul, South Korea.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • Piatek, M., Isdal, T., Krishnamurthy, A., Anderson, T.: `One hop reputations for peer to peer file sharing workloads', Proc. Fifth USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI’08), April 2008, San Francisco, California.
    15. 15)
      • Izal, M., Uroy-Keller, G., Biersack, E., Felber, P.A., Hamra, A.A., Garces-Erice, L.: `Dissecting Bittorrent: five months in torrent's lifetime', Proc. Fifth Passive and Active Measurement Conf. (PAM’04), 2004.
    16. 16)
      • Guo, L., Chen, S., Xiao, Z., Tan, E., Ding, X., Zhang, X.: `Measurements, analysis, and modeling of Bittorrent-like systems', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conf. (IMC’05), October 2005, Berkeley.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • Bellissimo, A., Levine, B.N., Shenoy, P.: `Exploring the use of Bittorrent as the basis for a large trace repository', Report 04-41, Technical, 2004, UMASS Amherst.
    19. 19)
      • Kaune, S., Rumín, R.C., Tyson, G.: `Unraveling BitTorrent's file unavailability: measurements and analysis', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P’10), August 2010, Delft, Netherlands.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • Hales, D., Rahman, R., Zhang, B.: `BitTorrent or BitCrunch: evidence of a credit squeeze in BitTorrent?', Proc. Fifth Collaborative Peer-to-Peer Systems Workshop (COPS’09), July 2009, Tarragona, Spain.
    22. 22)
      • Liu, Z., Dhungel, P., Wu, D., Zhang, C., Ross, K.W.: `Understanding and improving Incentives in private P2P communities', Proc. IEEE 30th Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’10), June 2010, Italy.
    23. 23)
      • Meulpolder, M., D'Acunto, L., Capotă, M.: `Public and private Bittorrent communities: a measurement study', Proc. Int. Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS’10), April 2010, San Jose, CA.
    24. 24)
      • Chen, X., Chu, X.-W., Liu, J.: `Unveiling popularity of BitTorrent Darknets', Proc. IEEE Globecom 2010, December 2010, Maimi, Florida.
    25. 25)
      • ‘World Broadband Statistics Q3 2009’, Company Reports, Point Topic Ltd,, accessed February 2011.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address